Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eyes to See's avatar

I’m hiv positive and have woken up to all this a couple years ago. I’m now off the drugs and likely stop getting tested. I’m

Healthy.

I am really wanting to know how the arvs make cd4 go up and whatever the viral load pcr is measuring go down. Do the drugs just clear all nucleic acids out of the blood so the pcr doesn’t pick anything up?

I was on biktarvy and happy I’m off.

I’d love anyone’s insights on this question.

Thanks Jamie for what you’re doing. This is so important and I’m grateful.

Expand full comment
xkry's avatar

The safety data sheets for other "anti-cancer chemotherapy" agents are likewise as sad and inadvertently hilarious as AZT. When I was a kid a friend had leukemia and was given arsenic trioxide, a carcinogenic deadly chemical agent that can be fatal if swallowed, causes skin burns and eye damage, and can cause respiratory and internal organ damage. It also, coincidentally, like all arsenic poisoning, can cause severe cases of chicken pox and shingles, which ultimately killed my friend. They "explain" this by saying it "reactivates latent VZV infections" (although arsenic poisoning can also can cause a disease in dogs and cats that appears identical to severe chicken pox and shingles but in those cases it's *NOT* from a virus it's *JUST* from the arsenic exposure, because they don't get chicken pox, because the VZV virus *ONLY* infects human beings - apparently it cannot "leap" to other species).

Since the advent of PReP homosexual men are now "saved" from HIV infections, even though CDC data shows that no more than 36% of "people who could benefit" are on PReP to manage HIV. So, somehow, almost no sexually active "MSM" (men-who-have-sex-with-men) are any longer dying of AIDS despite the fact that the majority of them don't really use any anti-virals or other toxic chemical agents to "prevent" or "treat" their "infections".

They claim there are almost 20 million people in Africa "with HIV" which clearly does not seem to be damaging any of them probably unless they are unfortunate enough to be given "treatments".

Many (most?) infectious diseases really appear to be quite the scam.

Expand full comment
85 more comments...

No posts