But Jamie, you did discover viruses, they're just man-made. Maybe dormant, maybe pseudoviruses, maybe foamy viruses like a beer head, but still viruses. Nobel prize material maybe?
EM is freeze-dried dead shadow, there is no EM that can tell you what a shadow is even if you did have an original, but at least having an original biologic object purified by ultra centrifuge and characterized as a virus would prove it existed. EM can only tell you your shadows are purified when that is all you can see, like sardines in a can.
Okay, so wow. I like getting these articles and scanning over them. The content seems far beyond my understanding, but I appreciate that you're doing this work and trying to set things straight. I'm still trying to catch up to the "no DNA" thing. I believe it, but don't understand it.
I'd like to understand what the forensic folks are comparing when someone is convicted based on DNA evidence found on a crime victim. It's a big scribble in my head, but I continue to try to sort through it all. God bless your work and your willingness to share and spread Truth.
They don't always know - and the results can be amazing - esp with ancestry and finding familial links to track down criminals years later. Still, people have gotten some interesting results submitting DNA as a dog - lol. If you have a link for a solid, simple, and detailed documentary that explains it all, please post.
Those circles in the micrographs originate from healthy laboratory cells. This is strong scientific evidence that refutes the ideas and use of microscopy-based claims about the existence of "viruses."
Thanks for the experiments. We are tired of empty talk without conducted/funded exp. My conclusion: virologists deceive the public by misrepresenting healthy laboratory cells (healthy human) as something dangerous after damaging them with the laboratory "tools".
Heh, heh... Virologists deceive themselves well before the public is apprised of the fraud. The "no virus" theory fails to address the presence of chemical toxins used in laboratory analyses. The majority of microscopy studies are hopelessly flawed and redundant.
Here's a study of all the 'life saving' adjuncts found in jab samples. >>> Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereo-microscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna >>> A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study >>> July 18, 2024 >>> https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/102/291
O'righty then. How do laboratory processes affect conditions within the sample, compared with how chemicals may react or affect within living tissues? Erm...
Would these "main" no-virus people be the same individuals who blocked us all? I am sorry, PM, but I cannot remember their names.... they are so far out from my radar.
I hope they squirm in the fly-infested shit that they relished a few months ago.
She has already done that. She has blocked me so how is she going to know if I call her out for the divisive witch that she is? I hope she DOES continue with her vendetta against us - she will be losing subscribers and believers at a suitable pace. Nobody likes bitchcraft.
For me personally... the cell cultures were just nonsense but actually seeing these things they call viruses like this in just Cell lines breaking down.. that to me was all I need as absolute proof... it is the very thing the physical entity... and it is quite clearly all bollocks.
thanks for this; this is all very interesting; now to try to talk to friends who believe in the V word; they believe in Santa Claus; they believe there are fairies at the bottom of their garden; how will they react to this work I wonder?
Oh that's worrying, all those structures fit the bill for programmable synthetic bio warfare using sythesized cell constructs and lipids. The omicron structures resemble the lipid nanoparticles we are seeing in blood via dark field due to plasmonics which make some nano materials visible as they fluoresce. What they don't look like is a virus as it was described to us. Nice work, yet again. You are helping my curious and devious mind.
Time only permits a scan and reading of the conclusion....all foldered (my urban) for a later date....this is sooo nice it can only be ALL TRUE.....many thanks Jamie and team.....but can you prove whether we exist or not....?
😂 Viral-like! When no one has seen a virus - or proved there's contagion. But of course, it is a useful buzzword for scare-covid-don't-kill-granny-go-get-jabbed!
And some killer pictures to"prove 'oh there's sars-2, oh there's measles, oh there's hiv. Very recognisable and convincing - not?
Sorry, I'm trying, but I can't find certain parts of the measles virus on your control pictures. Where are F (fusion) protein, HA (haemagglutinin), nucleocapsid, phosphoprotein etc.?
If you look at the CDC image all of these different things are just slightly darker grey dots in the matrix, point to any of them, that is the point that that is what the CDC do.
But Jamie, you did discover viruses, they're just man-made. Maybe dormant, maybe pseudoviruses, maybe foamy viruses like a beer head, but still viruses. Nobel prize material maybe?
LOL! Next He'll prove contagion!
I did that years ago, too. ha haaar harf!
LOL!
I fink there's a FOAMY VIRUS up my left nostril RIGHT NOW!!!!
EEEEEYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!
Oh, I did that years ago. ;)
Virologists should ride off into the sunset on their unicorns
🎯
Come on. Be fair to the Unicorns. No self respecting Unicorn would want anything to do with a virologist...
These days I see why scientists got fooled.
They knew that the electron microscope was reliable.
It is, but not for organic matter.
They somehow couldn't see that the methods of prepping for the electron microscope - freezing, staining would corrupt the result.
Garbage in, garbage out.
Virology: Fun with Shapes 101.
Even with TEM technology, they don't know what they are looking at.
EM is freeze-dried dead shadow, there is no EM that can tell you what a shadow is even if you did have an original, but at least having an original biologic object purified by ultra centrifuge and characterized as a virus would prove it existed. EM can only tell you your shadows are purified when that is all you can see, like sardines in a can.
Okay, so wow. I like getting these articles and scanning over them. The content seems far beyond my understanding, but I appreciate that you're doing this work and trying to set things straight. I'm still trying to catch up to the "no DNA" thing. I believe it, but don't understand it.
I'd like to understand what the forensic folks are comparing when someone is convicted based on DNA evidence found on a crime victim. It's a big scribble in my head, but I continue to try to sort through it all. God bless your work and your willingness to share and spread Truth.
DNA analysis works best when the lab knows the desired result beforehand.
They don't always know - and the results can be amazing - esp with ancestry and finding familial links to track down criminals years later. Still, people have gotten some interesting results submitting DNA as a dog - lol. If you have a link for a solid, simple, and detailed documentary that explains it all, please post.
I don't think I can fill that bill, I can offer you this: https://thewayfwrd.com/podcast/new-biology-clinic-with-dr-tom-cowan/
Congratulations to all the team Jamie
Those circles in the micrographs originate from healthy laboratory cells. This is strong scientific evidence that refutes the ideas and use of microscopy-based claims about the existence of "viruses."
Thanks for the experiments. We are tired of empty talk without conducted/funded exp. My conclusion: virologists deceive the public by misrepresenting healthy laboratory cells (healthy human) as something dangerous after damaging them with the laboratory "tools".
Heh, heh... Virologists deceive themselves well before the public is apprised of the fraud. The "no virus" theory fails to address the presence of chemical toxins used in laboratory analyses. The majority of microscopy studies are hopelessly flawed and redundant.
Here's a study of all the 'life saving' adjuncts found in jab samples. >>> Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereo-microscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna >>> A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study >>> July 18, 2024 >>> https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/102/291
O'righty then. How do laboratory processes affect conditions within the sample, compared with how chemicals may react or affect within living tissues? Erm...
Stefan Lanka and Next Level: https://www.wissen-neu-gedacht.de/gefaehrliche-behauptungen-falsche-kritik-an-der-corona-impfung
*use autotranslate option in your browser
Notice that the "main" no-virus people may include Jamie as a fly on shit but will not take up Jamie's work. Twilight Zone material.
Would these "main" no-virus people be the same individuals who blocked us all? I am sorry, PM, but I cannot remember their names.... they are so far out from my radar.
I hope they squirm in the fly-infested shit that they relished a few months ago.
Frances... If you keep this up Sam Bailey is going to make another cow shit meme with your head on it my dear... And no one wants that!
She has already done that. She has blocked me so how is she going to know if I call her out for the divisive witch that she is? I hope she DOES continue with her vendetta against us - she will be losing subscribers and believers at a suitable pace. Nobody likes bitchcraft.
I promise you they are keenly aware of what Jamie does and who writes what on his comments. It's called "enemy reconnaissance"
Wow, they all look so alike,
For me personally... the cell cultures were just nonsense but actually seeing these things they call viruses like this in just Cell lines breaking down.. that to me was all I need as absolute proof... it is the very thing the physical entity... and it is quite clearly all bollocks.
Judging from this experiment it’s obvious that anyone could claim it’s just about anything. Bollocks indeed
finally virology is made to be fun. hilarious even.
thanks for this; this is all very interesting; now to try to talk to friends who believe in the V word; they believe in Santa Claus; they believe there are fairies at the bottom of their garden; how will they react to this work I wonder?
Oh that's worrying, all those structures fit the bill for programmable synthetic bio warfare using sythesized cell constructs and lipids. The omicron structures resemble the lipid nanoparticles we are seeing in blood via dark field due to plasmonics which make some nano materials visible as they fluoresce. What they don't look like is a virus as it was described to us. Nice work, yet again. You are helping my curious and devious mind.
Time only permits a scan and reading of the conclusion....all foldered (my urban) for a later date....this is sooo nice it can only be ALL TRUE.....many thanks Jamie and team.....but can you prove whether we exist or not....?
😂 Viral-like! When no one has seen a virus - or proved there's contagion. But of course, it is a useful buzzword for scare-covid-don't-kill-granny-go-get-jabbed!
And some killer pictures to"prove 'oh there's sars-2, oh there's measles, oh there's hiv. Very recognisable and convincing - not?
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 amazing work! Respect and thank you!
But I still can not see the 3D shapes that the mainstream media is showing on the news if they talk about viruses and try to scare people… :)
They must be using some advance rendering technology:P
Yes otherwise known as cartoon animations
Be fair, Jamie! They are very pretty cartoon animations! Must have taken ages to create. Art is so under-rated since AI came along.
Sorry, I'm trying, but I can't find certain parts of the measles virus on your control pictures. Where are F (fusion) protein, HA (haemagglutinin), nucleocapsid, phosphoprotein etc.?
If you look at the CDC image all of these different things are just slightly darker grey dots in the matrix, point to any of them, that is the point that that is what the CDC do.