There is an entire book devoted to Contagion. “Can you catch a cold”. Published this year. There is a chapter devoted to the Common Cold Research unit. You have added valuable additional information. Thankyou.
This is one of the stories I point to. It's also like the people who isolated before traveling to Antarctica and then there was a COVID outbreak. Two big factors are temperature and various EMFs people come in contact with on their journey.
There are other possible triggers. Stress due to the future strains. In the mindset of believing in the virus, perhaps 'preventive measures' are also taken so that new arrivals do not 'bring in an infection'? Vaccinations' are certainly an option. Or 'prophylactic' medication, antibiotics etc.
The term for this behaviour is 'mirror fencing'.
What is extremely sobering and sad is that in this particular case of the Antarctic research station, it is actually so-called scientists who do not seem to understand the phenomenon of disease. These are people who are supposed to generate knowledge for a lot of money. And then they allow themselves to be led up the garden path by a fairy tale that stands on such thin ice.
If I'm not mistaken, the article says that all those who developed what was called CV19 based on PCR testing (PCR is incapable of diagnosing anything), had been vaccinated prior to going to Antartica, not that they were isolated/quarantined prior to going there. Wouldn't it be correct to say that whatever they developed upon reaching Antartica must be assumed to be the result of the injections they received prior to arriving there, (until proven otherwise). It seems to me, only if they had not been vaccinated but were isolated/quarantined prior to going there would the case be dispositive that some environmental factor was the cause, rather than an alleged contagious microbe.
One can assume that is a factor for sure because there is evidence that many people recorded a COVID diagnosis shortly after vaccination. I don’t know the exact timings of their jabs, but pairing that with a change in environment could trigger the disease I imagine.
Talks of meteorological causes (B.C.) & even links to volcanic eruptions, earthquakes & comets, it also mentions outbreaks on ships months from port, which is similar to the outbreaks at the Antarctic base.
You're welcome Jamie, I like old books & have noticed that aeon’s ago people were well aware that observation, followed by rational analysis of natural phenomenon would provide them with a pragmatic knowledge of nature & illness/disease.
Had a brainwave regarding wet hair reading this.. total u-turn segway lol but it was with the one Antartic guy 'catching a cold' when he was out in the elements.. Totally nothing to do with that particular situation but what if there is truth to this old wives tale.. where wet hair actually simply increases susceptibility to electromagnetic interference? We already know it's a massive factor in health so perhaps walking around with wet hair is like walking around with an open wound..an antenna attracting and amplifying electromagnetic interference. This would be ok if you were in a good environment but then boom! ..the wrong environment and you have an influx of cell disrupting frequencies centered on the head. This is about as crazy as I get fyi lol just to set all your minds at ease 🤣😊🖐
We are given a lense and analise the world accordingly.. most do not know how or understand the need to look from different perspectives/shift focus.. 🖐😊
Well, from My perspective, They were taught to assign "true" and "false" labels to data as They encounter them, believing or not believing. This ends up becoming emotionally attached to the assessment.
I am grateful to have had the father I had, who taught Me never to believe ANYTHING. Rather, place probability of truth based on how well the data explain what I see. Be open to adjust probabilities as new data come along that better explain what I see.
Never give 100% or 0% as there is always the possibility that there are data I don't have.
In this way, I do not attach, and adjusting to better data is easy. Needless to say, My perspective of thing deviates greatly from the average One indoctrinated into this system. Haha!
I absolutely LOVE using their own "science" against them. They can't (honestly) say that you don't know what you're talking about or you're just making things up or believing things because you want to believe them if you are starting from their own premises and then applying pure logic.
And yet, the virologists have an explanation: fomites.
Because they always have an explanation. Because that's what psuedoscientific unfalsifiability requires.
An explanation based on ass-umptions and narrow perceptions though aye 🖐😄
If they only knew that colds are a detox mechanism instead of an infection.
They keep focusing on the symptom as the cause.
Upside down bizarro world.
Zackly.
There is an entire book devoted to Contagion. “Can you catch a cold”. Published this year. There is a chapter devoted to the Common Cold Research unit. You have added valuable additional information. Thankyou.
Daniel Roytas. Can you catch a cold. 2024 👍
Re: my interest was already peaked.
Piqued
thank you.. will edit.
This is one of the stories I point to. It's also like the people who isolated before traveling to Antarctica and then there was a COVID outbreak. Two big factors are temperature and various EMFs people come in contact with on their journey.
There are other possible triggers. Stress due to the future strains. In the mindset of believing in the virus, perhaps 'preventive measures' are also taken so that new arrivals do not 'bring in an infection'? Vaccinations' are certainly an option. Or 'prophylactic' medication, antibiotics etc.
The term for this behaviour is 'mirror fencing'.
What is extremely sobering and sad is that in this particular case of the Antarctic research station, it is actually so-called scientists who do not seem to understand the phenomenon of disease. These are people who are supposed to generate knowledge for a lot of money. And then they allow themselves to be led up the garden path by a fairy tale that stands on such thin ice.
Ahhh, you got the EMF factor... ^_^
Do you have a link for the allegation that there was a COVID outbreak in Antartica among people who isolated prior to traveling there?
There are many news stories. It happened multiple times just like colds.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-59848160.amp
Look what I oversaw at first reading the article!
Quote "All residents at the base are required to be vaccinated before arriving and undergo several PCR tests."
Theses guys had simply a detox after their poisoning event. 🎉
Thank you for the link.
If I'm not mistaken, the article says that all those who developed what was called CV19 based on PCR testing (PCR is incapable of diagnosing anything), had been vaccinated prior to going to Antartica, not that they were isolated/quarantined prior to going there. Wouldn't it be correct to say that whatever they developed upon reaching Antartica must be assumed to be the result of the injections they received prior to arriving there, (until proven otherwise). It seems to me, only if they had not been vaccinated but were isolated/quarantined prior to going there would the case be dispositive that some environmental factor was the cause, rather than an alleged contagious microbe.
One can assume that is a factor for sure because there is evidence that many people recorded a COVID diagnosis shortly after vaccination. I don’t know the exact timings of their jabs, but pairing that with a change in environment could trigger the disease I imagine.
A review of the literature on influenza and the common cold / by J. G. Townsend, surgeon, United States Public Health Service (1923) https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b5368601&view=1up&seq=1
Talks of meteorological causes (B.C.) & even links to volcanic eruptions, earthquakes & comets, it also mentions outbreaks on ships months from port, which is similar to the outbreaks at the Antarctic base.
Interesting... thanks Andy
You're welcome Jamie, I like old books & have noticed that aeon’s ago people were well aware that observation, followed by rational analysis of natural phenomenon would provide them with a pragmatic knowledge of nature & illness/disease.
I appreciate your content and continued effort at this critical time. I feel that the tipping point is just another share or two away.
I've been sharing your Weston A Price interview through contagionhoax.com
Powerful and informative!
Truth, Love, Justice and Freedom!
All the world's a stage and we're all being played
BUT
we are also the players.
I love reading articles like this from the real players on this world's stage spending the honest truth.
The truth is a hard pill to swallow, but it will set you free once people can break free from the mass indoctrinated propaganda.
Thank you for this well written article.
thanks Tim... much appreciated
Excellent review, I am very impressed with this one.
Thank you Karl.
You got me at "I await for the “outbreak” on the International Space Station" 🤣
Brilliant as always !
"I await for the “outbreak” on the International Space Station"
I suspect those on the ISS get more daylight and sunlight than those on the Antarctic Station in the months of June/July.
You can be sure of that! Once they're done filming on the ISS movie set, they get to go home and get all the daylight and sunlight they need!
Joel knows what's up👍
100% on point with this post!!
I hear they get thru a lot of hairspray on set
Is there any independently verifiable evidence that the ISS physically exists in its alleged orbit?
It is visible. This NASA website will tell you when it is visible from where you are.
https://spotthestation.nasa.gov/
Excellent article. Thank you. Now lets find out how these symptoms manifest from the terrain and weather and why half the group did not have symptoms.
Had a brainwave regarding wet hair reading this.. total u-turn segway lol but it was with the one Antartic guy 'catching a cold' when he was out in the elements.. Totally nothing to do with that particular situation but what if there is truth to this old wives tale.. where wet hair actually simply increases susceptibility to electromagnetic interference? We already know it's a massive factor in health so perhaps walking around with wet hair is like walking around with an open wound..an antenna attracting and amplifying electromagnetic interference. This would be ok if you were in a good environment but then boom! ..the wrong environment and you have an influx of cell disrupting frequencies centered on the head. This is about as crazy as I get fyi lol just to set all your minds at ease 🤣😊🖐
I think there is a lot to be discovered and questioned about the truth cause of disease.. don't ever feel like your opinions aren't welcome.
You'd think People would get a clue about contagion, but... I guess the indoctrination and propaganda are seriously in the way. [sigh]
We are given a lense and analise the world accordingly.. most do not know how or understand the need to look from different perspectives/shift focus.. 🖐😊
Well, from My perspective, They were taught to assign "true" and "false" labels to data as They encounter them, believing or not believing. This ends up becoming emotionally attached to the assessment.
I am grateful to have had the father I had, who taught Me never to believe ANYTHING. Rather, place probability of truth based on how well the data explain what I see. Be open to adjust probabilities as new data come along that better explain what I see.
Never give 100% or 0% as there is always the possibility that there are data I don't have.
In this way, I do not attach, and adjusting to better data is easy. Needless to say, My perspective of thing deviates greatly from the average One indoctrinated into this system. Haha!
"According to THEIR science..."
I absolutely LOVE using their own "science" against them. They can't (honestly) say that you don't know what you're talking about or you're just making things up or believing things because you want to believe them if you are starting from their own premises and then applying pure logic.