Thank you, thank you thank you! Your work is much appreciated. I've added this (along with your Jan 31 article) to a summary of reports on this subject for researchers and truth-tellers who can use it:
Farcical, Fraudulent Use of PCR Testing for Diagnosis, Case Counts & Contagion
Great article Jamie, I had never quite appreciated a) that the supposed mechanical way these enzymes are working makes little sense when they are in solution and b) that they supposedly exhibit exemplary patience and obedience, working in a nice sequential way when they are all part of the same solution…
All factors being the same in a series of PCR reactions, I guess the question is WHAT is the characteristic of the different samples that causes the exponential phase to happen earlier than others… but I’m sure you’ll get to it ;)
This is all way above my grade level, but I do understand what Jamie is getting at. I’m a visual learner, as I suppose many people are, so those cartoons are designed to satisfy our basic needs. But those visualizations are based on things that NOBODY has seen , so how do they know that’s what is happening? It’s like the pretty creative art depicting the coronavirus. I’m willing to bet a lot of people believe that is what a “virus” looks like. They are the same people who think Leonardo da Vinci’s painting of the last supper is like a photograph of that event.
That said, you don't seem to understand how catalysts work. I say that because you're making exactly the same comments I was making before I understood, a year or two ago. And that's normal; official science does everything it can to keep us from understanding. I, too, was thinking, what are these things that allow you to accelerate a reaction 1000 times without reacting with the reaction components? What's this nonsense?
But one day, the idea came to me. In fact, in chemistry, a catalyst is a product that transforms a reaction in 3D space into a reaction in 2D space. Let's say you have two particles reacting with each other. In the horizontal plane, they are 1 nm apart and can react. But in vertical space, they are 10 cm apart. So they won't meet. But if we manage to get the second particle to join the other in horizontal space, they will meet and react with each other.
So, if we put two gases that react together in a tube, the particles that hit the walls of the tube will end up in a 2D space (the tube) instead of remaining in a 3D space, which will cancel out the vertical separation and greatly increase the chances of two particles meeting at a given time.
Obviously, in a large tube, there is a lot of free space. But, if we use lots of microtubes where there is very little space, the probability of the particles hitting the wall and meeting becomes very high. Thus, we can multiply the reaction rate by 1000.
This is why car catalytic converters are made up of many small tubes. In fact, we could also say that catalysts serve to reduce the space in which the particles are located so that the probability of them meeting increases greatly.
But of course, the particles that are supposed to react with each other must not react with the catalyst. Otherwise, we would have a reactant-catalyst reaction. And that's not what we want. That's why we use catalysts that don't react with the reactants. And that's why we can reuse a catalyst again and again.
For example, in car catalytic converters, we use the heat of the gases present and the catalytic effect of the catalytic converter to bring the oxygen and unburned gasoline molecules closer together to combust them and produce less unburned fumes at the exhaust. And since the platinum in the catalytic converter doesn't react with oxygen and gasoline, the catalytic effect of the converter can last for a very long time.
And so, catalysts can take various forms. We've seen the case of tubes. But we can use a system where, in a container, there are beads between which gases or liquids pass. If the space is saturated with beads, the reactants will have a high probability of hitting the surface of the beads and reacting with each other.
And we can also use powders that we place in the container containing gases or liquids containing reactants. And this is where we come to the principle of enzymes.
In principle, enzymes are biological catalysts in powder form.
At first glance, we might think that biological catalysts are possible. However, since they are composed of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and possibly nitrogen, it is very unlikely that they won't react with the elements we want to react together and possibly with other elements present.
So, in my opinion, your intuition is correct. Most so-called enzymes are scams, and perhaps all of them. In fact, they aren't catalysts, but molecules that play an active role in the reaction.
However, since they're never going to be reused, anyone can say anything they like about them.
We could say they have an enormous lifespan as catalysts since they won't react with the reactants. But since they're discarded afterward, it's impossible to verify this claim.
To boil it down I think you are just talking about surface area.. I agree... this is just a basic principle of physics... like 1 big ice cube will take longer to melt than the same volume all crushed up and vica versa.
Oh, and when I say "WE could say they have an enormous lifespan as catalysts" at the end, I meant "people", or more precisely "scientists could say". The French noun "on" can mean "we" or something like "people". And Google Translate has some difficulties with that.
I have higher degrees in microbiology- convid compelled me to take a look at viruses and based on the evidence virology and contagion is fraudulent- but now I am questioning genomics- and every sacred truth we were taught- photosynthesis- the Krebs cycle - stem cells- i spent 3 years in a lab making transgenic flies- in hindsight I realize how all recombinant DNA techniques could all be deceptive in some way and the results we were seeing could be explained away through something in the medium or substrate. It's possible that all cloning was a deception. Any GMO strains of life could simply be a result of cross breeding using the same techniques as dog breeding. The scale of the deception is staggering- like a movie with a radical plot twist in the last scene that inverts the whole plot
Okay, thanks Jamie. I love you, but you make my head hurt😖 I’ll read it 7 more times and see if my brain can take it in & sort it out. This is certainly not my gift or my forte, but I do appreciate, and try to understand, your work 👍🏼
Thank you so much! I've already followed your posts on virus isolation and your investigations, and despite the complexity of the topic, you managed to expose the scam even to a layperson.
I also find this post about PCR very interesting—the tool of fake diagnosis that Christian Drosten used to build the pandemic narrative (with his article on Eurosurveillance on January 23, 2020).
I'll need to read it a few more times to fully grasp it, but one thing already comes to mind: every time a Nobel Prize is awarded, a scam is probably in the making... it might be a great clue to predict the future!
Let me see if I understand what you are saying. They are using components of bacteria to test to see if bacteria is present. But they are introducing components of bacteria so even if bacteria wasn’t present, they have introduced it as part of the test so the test always comes up positive? That might sound stupid. I hope I’m not way off but I’m just trying to boil this down to something I can understand and share. I got the part about how they identify things (enzymes for example) as being present by introducing other things that produce the same effect as the thing they are looking for would produce. Then claiming that the predictably similar result is proof that the thing they were looking for is present. Sounds more like gaslighting than science. Do I have any of this right?
The lemon example make me think of those invisible writing tricks with a lamp. It's like the world is being fooled by a simple magic trick for 5 year old children. Put drop of solution and hold up to the light...
Lol... imagine if they were getting those enzymes from hot pond scuzz too..
Thank you, thank you thank you! Your work is much appreciated. I've added this (along with your Jan 31 article) to a summary of reports on this subject for researchers and truth-tellers who can use it:
Farcical, Fraudulent Use of PCR Testing for Diagnosis, Case Counts & Contagion
https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/farcical-fraudulent-use-of-pcr-testing
It's put into context of more than 750 reports here:
Covid-19 Reporting Corruption & Fraud – Censorship & Suppression of Evidence & Testimony – Measurement and Data Integrity Issues – Misinformation & Manipulation of Reporting – Propaganda & Narrative Control
https://birdseyeview.xyz/research-and-testimony-library/covid-19-virus-a-summary-of-independent-reports-on-the-virus-governments-response-to-it/covid-19-virus-testing-measurement-reporting-censorship/
They just attach imaginary stories to chemical reactions. They certainly want to complicate things so that it would not be easy to expose the fraud.
Great article Jamie, I had never quite appreciated a) that the supposed mechanical way these enzymes are working makes little sense when they are in solution and b) that they supposedly exhibit exemplary patience and obedience, working in a nice sequential way when they are all part of the same solution…
All factors being the same in a series of PCR reactions, I guess the question is WHAT is the characteristic of the different samples that causes the exponential phase to happen earlier than others… but I’m sure you’ll get to it ;)
Thanks Dan, yes hopefully we can uncover that mystery together as we step through all of the pieces of the puzzle.
This is all way above my grade level, but I do understand what Jamie is getting at. I’m a visual learner, as I suppose many people are, so those cartoons are designed to satisfy our basic needs. But those visualizations are based on things that NOBODY has seen , so how do they know that’s what is happening? It’s like the pretty creative art depicting the coronavirus. I’m willing to bet a lot of people believe that is what a “virus” looks like. They are the same people who think Leonardo da Vinci’s painting of the last supper is like a photograph of that event.
When everything the People know is wrong.... Good work breaking the fabrications apart!
As I’ve said many times before, I’m no STEM person but even I can understand this article.
Thank you Jamie for making this accessible to all of us ❤️
Thank you Susan.
Really enjoyed my first chemistry lecture and the mock
even more, drove the message home way better !
Awesome. Another great article. Bravissimo!
That said, you don't seem to understand how catalysts work. I say that because you're making exactly the same comments I was making before I understood, a year or two ago. And that's normal; official science does everything it can to keep us from understanding. I, too, was thinking, what are these things that allow you to accelerate a reaction 1000 times without reacting with the reaction components? What's this nonsense?
But one day, the idea came to me. In fact, in chemistry, a catalyst is a product that transforms a reaction in 3D space into a reaction in 2D space. Let's say you have two particles reacting with each other. In the horizontal plane, they are 1 nm apart and can react. But in vertical space, they are 10 cm apart. So they won't meet. But if we manage to get the second particle to join the other in horizontal space, they will meet and react with each other.
So, if we put two gases that react together in a tube, the particles that hit the walls of the tube will end up in a 2D space (the tube) instead of remaining in a 3D space, which will cancel out the vertical separation and greatly increase the chances of two particles meeting at a given time.
Obviously, in a large tube, there is a lot of free space. But, if we use lots of microtubes where there is very little space, the probability of the particles hitting the wall and meeting becomes very high. Thus, we can multiply the reaction rate by 1000.
This is why car catalytic converters are made up of many small tubes. In fact, we could also say that catalysts serve to reduce the space in which the particles are located so that the probability of them meeting increases greatly.
But of course, the particles that are supposed to react with each other must not react with the catalyst. Otherwise, we would have a reactant-catalyst reaction. And that's not what we want. That's why we use catalysts that don't react with the reactants. And that's why we can reuse a catalyst again and again.
For example, in car catalytic converters, we use the heat of the gases present and the catalytic effect of the catalytic converter to bring the oxygen and unburned gasoline molecules closer together to combust them and produce less unburned fumes at the exhaust. And since the platinum in the catalytic converter doesn't react with oxygen and gasoline, the catalytic effect of the converter can last for a very long time.
And so, catalysts can take various forms. We've seen the case of tubes. But we can use a system where, in a container, there are beads between which gases or liquids pass. If the space is saturated with beads, the reactants will have a high probability of hitting the surface of the beads and reacting with each other.
And we can also use powders that we place in the container containing gases or liquids containing reactants. And this is where we come to the principle of enzymes.
In principle, enzymes are biological catalysts in powder form.
At first glance, we might think that biological catalysts are possible. However, since they are composed of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and possibly nitrogen, it is very unlikely that they won't react with the elements we want to react together and possibly with other elements present.
So, in my opinion, your intuition is correct. Most so-called enzymes are scams, and perhaps all of them. In fact, they aren't catalysts, but molecules that play an active role in the reaction.
However, since they're never going to be reused, anyone can say anything they like about them.
We could say they have an enormous lifespan as catalysts since they won't react with the reactants. But since they're discarded afterward, it's impossible to verify this claim.
To boil it down I think you are just talking about surface area.. I agree... this is just a basic principle of physics... like 1 big ice cube will take longer to melt than the same volume all crushed up and vica versa.
Yes, that's exactly it.
Oh, and when I say "WE could say they have an enormous lifespan as catalysts" at the end, I meant "people", or more precisely "scientists could say". The French noun "on" can mean "we" or something like "people". And Google Translate has some difficulties with that.
I have higher degrees in microbiology- convid compelled me to take a look at viruses and based on the evidence virology and contagion is fraudulent- but now I am questioning genomics- and every sacred truth we were taught- photosynthesis- the Krebs cycle - stem cells- i spent 3 years in a lab making transgenic flies- in hindsight I realize how all recombinant DNA techniques could all be deceptive in some way and the results we were seeing could be explained away through something in the medium or substrate. It's possible that all cloning was a deception. Any GMO strains of life could simply be a result of cross breeding using the same techniques as dog breeding. The scale of the deception is staggering- like a movie with a radical plot twist in the last scene that inverts the whole plot
Okay, thanks Jamie. I love you, but you make my head hurt😖 I’ll read it 7 more times and see if my brain can take it in & sort it out. This is certainly not my gift or my forte, but I do appreciate, and try to understand, your work 👍🏼
What about LaunDrY dEterGenT with EnZymEs? May be fake, but it's good business: Novozymes market cap is $24 bn.
Good point! So are the so called enzymes truly non-existent? Just wow!!!
"Willy". LOL
Thank you so much! I've already followed your posts on virus isolation and your investigations, and despite the complexity of the topic, you managed to expose the scam even to a layperson.
I also find this post about PCR very interesting—the tool of fake diagnosis that Christian Drosten used to build the pandemic narrative (with his article on Eurosurveillance on January 23, 2020).
I'll need to read it a few more times to fully grasp it, but one thing already comes to mind: every time a Nobel Prize is awarded, a scam is probably in the making... it might be a great clue to predict the future!
Let me see if I understand what you are saying. They are using components of bacteria to test to see if bacteria is present. But they are introducing components of bacteria so even if bacteria wasn’t present, they have introduced it as part of the test so the test always comes up positive? That might sound stupid. I hope I’m not way off but I’m just trying to boil this down to something I can understand and share. I got the part about how they identify things (enzymes for example) as being present by introducing other things that produce the same effect as the thing they are looking for would produce. Then claiming that the predictably similar result is proof that the thing they were looking for is present. Sounds more like gaslighting than science. Do I have any of this right?
Yes that's it... gaslighting instead of science
The lemon example make me think of those invisible writing tricks with a lamp. It's like the world is being fooled by a simple magic trick for 5 year old children. Put drop of solution and hold up to the light...