44 Comments

Lol... imagine if they were getting those enzymes from hot pond scuzz too..

Expand full comment

I appreciate you going into the details because I don't have the patience reading sci fi pseudoscience.

The basic premise of PCR makes no freaking sense.

Amplifying is not a digital exact copy. After so many copies of copies, it's full of static.

https://robc137.substack.com/p/pcr-fails-logic-from-the-start-sorry

Expand full comment

Thank you, thank you thank you! Your work is much appreciated. I've added this (along with your Jan 31 article) to a summary of reports on this subject for researchers and truth-tellers who can use it:

Farcical, Fraudulent Use of PCR Testing for Diagnosis, Case Counts & Contagion

https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/farcical-fraudulent-use-of-pcr-testing

It's put into context of more than 750 reports here:

Covid-19 Reporting Corruption & Fraud – Censorship & Suppression of Evidence & Testimony – Measurement and Data Integrity Issues – Misinformation & Manipulation of Reporting – Propaganda & Narrative Control

https://birdseyeview.xyz/research-and-testimony-library/covid-19-virus-a-summary-of-independent-reports-on-the-virus-governments-response-to-it/covid-19-virus-testing-measurement-reporting-censorship/

Expand full comment

They just attach imaginary stories to chemical reactions. They certainly want to complicate things so that it would not be easy to expose the fraud.

Expand full comment

When everything the People know is wrong.... Good work breaking the fabrications apart!

Expand full comment

Great article Jamie, I had never quite appreciated a) that the supposed mechanical way these enzymes are working makes little sense when they are in solution and b) that they supposedly exhibit exemplary patience and obedience, working in a nice sequential way when they are all part of the same solution…

All factors being the same in a series of PCR reactions, I guess the question is WHAT is the characteristic of the different samples that causes the exponential phase to happen earlier than others… but I’m sure you’ll get to it ;)

Expand full comment

Thanks Dan, yes hopefully we can uncover that mystery together as we step through all of the pieces of the puzzle.

Expand full comment

Really enjoyed my first chemistry lecture and the mock

even more, drove the message home way better !

Expand full comment

As I’ve said many times before, I’m no STEM person but even I can understand this article.

Thank you Jamie for making this accessible to all of us ❤️

Expand full comment

Thank you Susan.

Expand full comment

Okay, thanks Jamie. I love you, but you make my head hurt😖 I’ll read it 7 more times and see if my brain can take it in & sort it out. This is certainly not my gift or my forte, but I do appreciate, and try to understand, your work 👍🏼

Expand full comment

This is all way above my grade level, but I do understand what Jamie is getting at. I’m a visual learner, as I suppose many people are, so those cartoons are designed to satisfy our basic needs. But those visualizations are based on things that NOBODY has seen , so how do they know that’s what is happening? It’s like the pretty creative art depicting the coronavirus. I’m willing to bet a lot of people believe that is what a “virus” looks like. They are the same people who think Leonardo da Vinci’s painting of the last supper is like a photograph of that event.

Expand full comment

It would be interesting to see a PhD try to respond to your points, one by one. Have you attempted to engage with any of the defenders of this supposed dogma?

Expand full comment

I leave this information open for any criticism.. 1000s of "phd's" have had superficial criticisms but none have ever provided a full scientific rebuttal.

Expand full comment

I notice he liked your question but didn't respond to it. I wonder why?

Expand full comment

What about LaunDrY dEterGenT with EnZymEs? May be fake, but it's good business: Novozymes market cap is $24 bn.

Expand full comment

Good point! So are the so called enzymes truly non-existent? Just wow!!!

Expand full comment

"Willy". LOL

Expand full comment

I have higher degrees in microbiology- convid compelled me to take a look at viruses and based on the evidence virology and contagion is fraudulent- but now I am questioning genomics- and every sacred truth we were taught- photosynthesis- the Krebs cycle - stem cells- i spent 3 years in a lab making transgenic flies- in hindsight I realize how all recombinant DNA techniques could all be deceptive in some way and the results we were seeing could be explained away through something in the medium or substrate. It's possible that all cloning was a deception. Any GMO strains of life could simply be a result of cross breeding using the same techniques as dog breeding. The scale of the deception is staggering- like a movie with a radical plot twist in the last scene that inverts the whole plot

Expand full comment

Thank you so much! I've already followed your posts on virus isolation and your investigations, and despite the complexity of the topic, you managed to expose the scam even to a layperson.

I also find this post about PCR very interesting—the tool of fake diagnosis that Christian Drosten used to build the pandemic narrative (with his article on Eurosurveillance on January 23, 2020).

I'll need to read it a few more times to fully grasp it, but one thing already comes to mind: every time a Nobel Prize is awarded, a scam is probably in the making... it might be a great clue to predict the future!

Expand full comment

Corman & Drosten fabricated a test from a procedure which was NEVER a test. The whole thing has been debunked by many eminent and genuine scientists. Tedros then promulgated the myth as part of the convid psy-op.

This is very old news.

Expand full comment

The lemon example make me think of those invisible writing tricks with a lamp. It's like the world is being fooled by a simple magic trick for 5 year old children. Put drop of solution and hold up to the light...

Expand full comment