I just keep on asking myself why are you able to keep on pushing the bounds so easily... Where's all the other people with even bigger channels that's been talking about this same topic for years now!
Hey Jamie, you educated and entertained at the same time!
But, (you know I always have buts just for you😍) the answer was in the name: "Lucira" and the app called "Luci" like LUCY IN THE SKY WITH DIAMONDS, yes our friendly neighborhood Luc*fer shining bright the light of a positive test on the sacrifice. And not to forget Metrix="Matrix" meaning all the normies in the simulation believing in the system.
👉And importantly, the test swab gave the test taker some fibers and other gifts from heaven into his schnoze and noggin so he will get sick and dumbed-down further, turn positive next time, and beg for a vax or some immediate "medical care".
and in that post I noted a number (not all) of the problems they have and give us. Not only they, but "Make a Messy Massey", "Mike Stonewalling", and some others are "complexity diversions keeping us inside an anthill so we can't see outside".
More than omit actual infectious disease, they leave doubts about the no-virus while at the same time state there is no virus, they emphasize the confusion that no proper cell culture controls have been done with purified virus (which doesn't exist), push assembled genomes which can mean there is a virus a computer just figured out the virus genome instead of just writing out a genome, and others.
It seems Jordan wants us to stay in the germ theory, which is closer to the official narrative-that does not seem helpful to me either. The Bs & Co give a very soft message, to slightly confuse and keep us in the anthill. For me, well on viruses, all I needed to read was the first Fan Wu paper and that ended my love with viruses to a screeching halt. On bacteria etc, long time ago myself and colleagues spent considerable time around Tb pts-no masks, no one ever got ill. A good friend/mentor malaria expert ghosted me when I asked him for a paper showing that plasmodium was proven to cause malaria. So while I see what the Bail's actual game is now, I don't think it is to falsify actual infections (I see "infections" as overgrowth in damaged/ill bodies and tissue or in body spaces (acne, toenail fungus, gums, etc), the Bail's aim is to bury the no-germ people in an avalanche of no-germ info so they don't see the other parts of the death machine: hospital protocols, 5G, etc, and get them in a confusion about the fiction of computer assembled genomes and needing purified virus for a proper cell culture, etc. and focus on fake pandemics, not democide from these other things. Hope I'm making sense.
You make sense PM. I am delighted to have your response out in circulation. Helps the reader to objectively deduce conclusions. Thank you. Will be in touch.
How can they claim it does the same thing if they are only heating the sample once?
I thought the theory behind the PCR was that there were various heating and cooling steps in the cycle that allowed different stages of the reactions to take place - initialization, denaturation, annealing , elongation etc.
Makes no sense, it's a scam of a scam.
Ps - I think a thermomix is a better analogy than microwave
Yeah i saw you explain that in the article but i dont understand how they think we are supposed to believe it amplifies nucleic acids if it doesn't carry out all those stages (DNA splitting at 98 degrees, primers binding at 50 degrees, synthesising at 80 degrees) that the actual PCR supposedly does and that is the only difference between the two "tests". When are those different stages supposed to take place at a constant temperature in the LAMP technology?
It's just madness, they must think we are complete retards. They can't keep their story straight. You either need those separate stages or not, you can't have it both ways.
Perfect logic Mia! The answer to the "think we are retards" topic is because we've read lots of stuff and talk about this every day so we've recalibrated ourselves to think it should be common sense. Also, somehow something has clicked for us to see out of our indoctrination box-yes this is key.
The real scam is in the reagents which a lab will end up paying many times more than the cost of the machine over its lifetime. Reading your article now and looking back on my time in a research lab, it is such an absurd scam. The federal government doles out billions upon billions to university labs in grants for "medical research". The university admin takes half up front, then the labs spend most of it on expensive chemicals and equipment for things like PCR and chromatin immunoprecipitation (I remember the cost of supplies for this assay were astronomical and the supposed mechanism is even more ridiculous than PCR).
So basically it functions as a direct pipeline of US gov money into the pockets of a few biotech companies. What is produced is a mountain of journal articles that are read by absolutely no one and have zero practical effect on the way medicine is practiced.
If the reagent turns yellow in the presence of acid, then wouldn't the mark's--I mean, the virus victim's--DNA alone turn it yellow? Deoxyribonucleic *acid.* Ribonucleic *acid*. On any swab there's going to be far more DNA/RNA from the person than from a virus, too. And on any swab, viral RNA will accumulate just from the act of moving the swab through the air between the packet and the person's nose, and between the nose and the vial. There are trillions of viruses around us everywhere, all the time.
All the Lucira "community testing study" did was compare bullshit to bullshit and lo: It found bullshit. The "study" didn't use another method for confirmation of the results or they'd have said so. It just showed consistent worthlessness between two varieties of garbage. And anyway, there's no such thing as "diagnostic" PCR when PCR's inventor said repeatedly that it's not diagnostic for disease.
Notice that they keep cashing in on the public's confusion between the meaning of "authorized" by the FDA and "approved" under the EUA--and that any dupe "medical professional" who prescribes the test "will" report the results to the "relevant public health authorities," meaning the DoD. That's an order, soldier.
I love the "heads I win, tails you lose" disclaimer at the end: Even if you "test" negative, "Negative results do not preclude infection." Of course not. So what's the point? Besides padding Pfizer's bottom line, it's obviously to get people to view this intrusive garbage as completely normal. No more threatening than a glucose monitor, comrade.
So they don't sell the Lucira on Canadian Amazon? That is a shame. Will US amazon deliver to Canada? I am trying to get some of these to a friend there.
The acidity part of the test makes a lot of sense for further research. I remember the reports of using Coca-Cola to intentionally get a positive test result. Usually this was either school kids or employees not wanting to go to work. Yes, it involved snorting Coke (not that kind), but I just filed it away as interesting ideas that I will never have a use for. The use of ClO2 for a negative result seemed far more likely to be useful to me. I'm not sure about the acidity of ClO2, but now I may want to test it.
Thank you for continuing your research. Where are all of the other scientists in the world???
its all about the BIG LIE, the lies will keep getting more & more ridiculous, until we can collectively say NO, we are not falling for the B.S. this time.
Incredible, like they always have to go one step further from fiction for people to believe it. On the other hand, always with honor, hence the very apt name of Luci ( min 1:42 second video ). It might have been too much to add the "fer." Thanks for your work, Jamie!
You have to admire the audacity! How many billions of dollars have they raked in? How many billions of people have they fooled/scammed? An empire built on literally nothing.
I had to chuckle at the name ‘Lucira’. They can’t resist giving a little nod to Lucifer, their lord and master can they.
Thank you again Jamie for all that you’re doing. Chapeau!
Since there's no such virus, the so-called "SARS" sequences probably represent a set of acute phase RNA sequences of transient expression patterns arising from specific and non-specific states of physiological or psychic stress. This would explain the illusion that leads doctors into believing that their patients are "infected with a special virus", rather than interpreting the lab results as non-specific markers of inflammation due to fever, trauma, infarction, environmental toxins, etc.
Look at all the unidentified transcriptome activity that happens just from breathing in too many overcooked French fries:
Front Toxicol. 2023; 5: 1280230.
Published online 2023 Nov 27. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1280230
Differential transcriptomic alterations in nasal versus lung tissue of acrolein-exposed rats
"Acrolein inhalation changed expression of 452 genes in the nasal epithelium (310 upregulated and 142 downregulated) (Figure 3A)."
Not sure how these pocket "PCR" devices are related other than that they seem to rely upon the indirect measurement of the release of protons in the so-called amplification reactions. So to test out the utility of these devices, probably not such a good idea to use Coca Cola (pH 2.2) or anything of that sort as a test sample.
Cats & dogs should test negative for "covid RNA" but should also test negative for the "human RNA" used as the internal control in these devices. However, it should be possible to overcome this hurdle by using a mixed sample of cat + human or dog + human. Or human + French fries and such variations like that. In other words, to test the device, take the nasal sample after breathing in something pungent or otherwise inflammatory.
This is great work Jamie
I just keep on asking myself why are you able to keep on pushing the bounds so easily... Where's all the other people with even bigger channels that's been talking about this same topic for years now!
Keep it up.
It's ok. The neurotic people who still worry about the coof-vid are the only market for this crap.
Everyone else already moved on.
Hey Jamie, you educated and entertained at the same time!
But, (you know I always have buts just for you😍) the answer was in the name: "Lucira" and the app called "Luci" like LUCY IN THE SKY WITH DIAMONDS, yes our friendly neighborhood Luc*fer shining bright the light of a positive test on the sacrifice. And not to forget Metrix="Matrix" meaning all the normies in the simulation believing in the system.
👉And importantly, the test swab gave the test taker some fibers and other gifts from heaven into his schnoze and noggin so he will get sick and dumbed-down further, turn positive next time, and beg for a vax or some immediate "medical care".
👉$29 for your own demise, ingenious.
Hey PM. A bit off topic........... :-)
https://generalportal55.substack.com/p/clap-onclap-off
Thanks Dr. D., I like his word usage. On his logic, well you know I turned-in my Bailey fan-club ID the other day
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/secrets-of-the-bailey-castle
and in that post I noted a number (not all) of the problems they have and give us. Not only they, but "Make a Messy Massey", "Mike Stonewalling", and some others are "complexity diversions keeping us inside an anthill so we can't see outside".
More than omit actual infectious disease, they leave doubts about the no-virus while at the same time state there is no virus, they emphasize the confusion that no proper cell culture controls have been done with purified virus (which doesn't exist), push assembled genomes which can mean there is a virus a computer just figured out the virus genome instead of just writing out a genome, and others.
It seems Jordan wants us to stay in the germ theory, which is closer to the official narrative-that does not seem helpful to me either. The Bs & Co give a very soft message, to slightly confuse and keep us in the anthill. For me, well on viruses, all I needed to read was the first Fan Wu paper and that ended my love with viruses to a screeching halt. On bacteria etc, long time ago myself and colleagues spent considerable time around Tb pts-no masks, no one ever got ill. A good friend/mentor malaria expert ghosted me when I asked him for a paper showing that plasmodium was proven to cause malaria. So while I see what the Bail's actual game is now, I don't think it is to falsify actual infections (I see "infections" as overgrowth in damaged/ill bodies and tissue or in body spaces (acne, toenail fungus, gums, etc), the Bail's aim is to bury the no-germ people in an avalanche of no-germ info so they don't see the other parts of the death machine: hospital protocols, 5G, etc, and get them in a confusion about the fiction of computer assembled genomes and needing purified virus for a proper cell culture, etc. and focus on fake pandemics, not democide from these other things. Hope I'm making sense.
You make sense PM. I am delighted to have your response out in circulation. Helps the reader to objectively deduce conclusions. Thank you. Will be in touch.
You're so kind to me!
How can they claim it does the same thing if they are only heating the sample once?
I thought the theory behind the PCR was that there were various heating and cooling steps in the cycle that allowed different stages of the reactions to take place - initialization, denaturation, annealing , elongation etc.
Makes no sense, it's a scam of a scam.
Ps - I think a thermomix is a better analogy than microwave
That is the part they don't have in LAMP which is all the "cycle" stuff.. but that is the ONLY difference.
Yeah i saw you explain that in the article but i dont understand how they think we are supposed to believe it amplifies nucleic acids if it doesn't carry out all those stages (DNA splitting at 98 degrees, primers binding at 50 degrees, synthesising at 80 degrees) that the actual PCR supposedly does and that is the only difference between the two "tests". When are those different stages supposed to take place at a constant temperature in the LAMP technology?
It's just madness, they must think we are complete retards. They can't keep their story straight. You either need those separate stages or not, you can't have it both ways.
Perfect logic Mia! The answer to the "think we are retards" topic is because we've read lots of stuff and talk about this every day so we've recalibrated ourselves to think it should be common sense. Also, somehow something has clicked for us to see out of our indoctrination box-yes this is key.
Majority of CONvid believers ARE retards!!
not forever.
Why are people testing for something that can’t be proven to exist?
Mental programming.
The real scam is in the reagents which a lab will end up paying many times more than the cost of the machine over its lifetime. Reading your article now and looking back on my time in a research lab, it is such an absurd scam. The federal government doles out billions upon billions to university labs in grants for "medical research". The university admin takes half up front, then the labs spend most of it on expensive chemicals and equipment for things like PCR and chromatin immunoprecipitation (I remember the cost of supplies for this assay were astronomical and the supposed mechanism is even more ridiculous than PCR).
So basically it functions as a direct pipeline of US gov money into the pockets of a few biotech companies. What is produced is a mountain of journal articles that are read by absolutely no one and have zero practical effect on the way medicine is practiced.
That is what I started to assume, even the cell lines we used for the cultures were nearly $1000 for a tiny pellet of cells.
Yes the entire thing is a giant Ponzi and Embezzlement scheme to write blank checks for useless shit.
Thank you for corroborating that, given your first hand experience.
J
The cult is a hard habit to break...the covidians will see this as science......
I had at least one magic box as a child. This thing here serves roughly the same purpose, only for adults. 🥳🪄
Humanity wants to be deceived.
Most people would rather swallow lies than truth, especially if the liar has authority and the dis-information is soothing like a fine liqueur.
If the reagent turns yellow in the presence of acid, then wouldn't the mark's--I mean, the virus victim's--DNA alone turn it yellow? Deoxyribonucleic *acid.* Ribonucleic *acid*. On any swab there's going to be far more DNA/RNA from the person than from a virus, too. And on any swab, viral RNA will accumulate just from the act of moving the swab through the air between the packet and the person's nose, and between the nose and the vial. There are trillions of viruses around us everywhere, all the time.
All the Lucira "community testing study" did was compare bullshit to bullshit and lo: It found bullshit. The "study" didn't use another method for confirmation of the results or they'd have said so. It just showed consistent worthlessness between two varieties of garbage. And anyway, there's no such thing as "diagnostic" PCR when PCR's inventor said repeatedly that it's not diagnostic for disease.
Notice that they keep cashing in on the public's confusion between the meaning of "authorized" by the FDA and "approved" under the EUA--and that any dupe "medical professional" who prescribes the test "will" report the results to the "relevant public health authorities," meaning the DoD. That's an order, soldier.
I love the "heads I win, tails you lose" disclaimer at the end: Even if you "test" negative, "Negative results do not preclude infection." Of course not. So what's the point? Besides padding Pfizer's bottom line, it's obviously to get people to view this intrusive garbage as completely normal. No more threatening than a glucose monitor, comrade.
Perfectly put.
"Using an ‘enhanced saliva’ collection protocol optimised for SARS-CoV-2 detection 6, we collected saliva samples from 3 healthy patients."
Published: 18 November 2021
Comparative analysis of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based assays for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 genes
Scientific Reports volume 11, Article number: 22493 (2021)
Spit from three people they found in the men's restroom at a Wendy's. Sounds very sciency.
That's more rigor than I expected from their "community testing study."
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Oxdx2B2dgfE?feature=share
Lol. I have no doubt.
I got some good chuckles!!!
I agree Jamie, the whole thing from top to bottom is a trillion dollar+ marketing campaign, driven by the media...and "something from nothing"
Try to see if they are selling anything like this in Canada and came across this...but made in the US...
But it's approved and certified 🙄
https://shop.cuehealth.ca/
Hey Albert,
So they don't sell the Lucira on Canadian Amazon? That is a shame. Will US amazon deliver to Canada? I am trying to get some of these to a friend there.
I guess it depends on how you will send it. Try sending one through regular mail...see what happens.
Just checked, nope Amazon Canada doesn't...
Yuk… OK… thanks for looking mate.
The acidity part of the test makes a lot of sense for further research. I remember the reports of using Coca-Cola to intentionally get a positive test result. Usually this was either school kids or employees not wanting to go to work. Yes, it involved snorting Coke (not that kind), but I just filed it away as interesting ideas that I will never have a use for. The use of ClO2 for a negative result seemed far more likely to be useful to me. I'm not sure about the acidity of ClO2, but now I may want to test it.
Thank you for continuing your research. Where are all of the other scientists in the world???
its all about the BIG LIE, the lies will keep getting more & more ridiculous, until we can collectively say NO, we are not falling for the B.S. this time.
Incredible, like they always have to go one step further from fiction for people to believe it. On the other hand, always with honor, hence the very apt name of Luci ( min 1:42 second video ). It might have been too much to add the "fer." Thanks for your work, Jamie!
P.D.: Interestingly they do add "ra" to luci ...
Ra was the Egyptian deity of the Sun. Even Wiki tells you what you need to know about Ra and how he fits into the story today
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra
Yes, that's why I made that final comment. :-)
You have to admire the audacity! How many billions of dollars have they raked in? How many billions of people have they fooled/scammed? An empire built on literally nothing.
I had to chuckle at the name ‘Lucira’. They can’t resist giving a little nod to Lucifer, their lord and master can they.
Thank you again Jamie for all that you’re doing. Chapeau!
Since there's no such virus, the so-called "SARS" sequences probably represent a set of acute phase RNA sequences of transient expression patterns arising from specific and non-specific states of physiological or psychic stress. This would explain the illusion that leads doctors into believing that their patients are "infected with a special virus", rather than interpreting the lab results as non-specific markers of inflammation due to fever, trauma, infarction, environmental toxins, etc.
Look at all the unidentified transcriptome activity that happens just from breathing in too many overcooked French fries:
Front Toxicol. 2023; 5: 1280230.
Published online 2023 Nov 27. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1280230
Differential transcriptomic alterations in nasal versus lung tissue of acrolein-exposed rats
"Acrolein inhalation changed expression of 452 genes in the nasal epithelium (310 upregulated and 142 downregulated) (Figure 3A)."
Not sure how these pocket "PCR" devices are related other than that they seem to rely upon the indirect measurement of the release of protons in the so-called amplification reactions. So to test out the utility of these devices, probably not such a good idea to use Coca Cola (pH 2.2) or anything of that sort as a test sample.
Cats & dogs should test negative for "covid RNA" but should also test negative for the "human RNA" used as the internal control in these devices. However, it should be possible to overcome this hurdle by using a mixed sample of cat + human or dog + human. Or human + French fries and such variations like that. In other words, to test the device, take the nasal sample after breathing in something pungent or otherwise inflammatory.