Kary HATED Toni Fauci, and publicly called him out as a fraud, and in the old interviews that I watched, He openly admitted that his pcr test wasn’t a diagnostic test, and should never be used for such.
He was mad that his test was being used to con people into believing that they were hiv positive, and didn’t hold back when the topic was ever brought up.
This is why I personally believe he was taken out just before they kicked off their fake pandemic. They knew that he hated Fauci and wasn’t going to sit back and let them pull off another HIV=AIDS fraud based on his pcr tests.
They gas light everyone, but that tactic wasn’t going to work against a Nobel prize winner, who invented the very PCR test that they were using.
Yes Kary had personality flaws, and wasn’t perfect, but I personally didn’t see him as an evil man, or someone that would go along with the wicked agenda that these Jesuits just got away with for the 2nd time.
And finally we can’t blame Kary for winning a Nobel prize based on a bogus test. They’ve been passing these awards out to bullshit ass clowns for decades…I mean, Obama and Henry (burn in hell) Kissinger both were awarded one too, and I’m fairly confident in saying that if Hell has levels, Kissinger is on the bottom floor, and Obama will be joining him one day in the future.
I would agree that Kary doesn't come across as intrinsically evil, not like someone as purposefully deceptive as Fauci. I would say he was a useful idiot that got his financial and celebrity award he so desired from the establishment that needed his (fake) tool to fake pandemics.
Why are you harping on a guy that got killed by the people you're actually mad at? He was dangerous to the psychopathic genocidal maniacs and this is the guy you're going after?
Your impressions of the things that Mullis said are wrong. I was THERE when Mullis said the ONLY remarks that I could EVER find where he even REMOTELY attempted to address the utility of the PCR as a "diagnostic" test. First of all Mullis NEVER said PCR can NOT be used as a "diagnostic" test. In fact, Mullis NEVER claimed that PCR was not a "diagnostic" test. He never used that word- "diagnostic" in the negative. In fact, in his book that Jamie has excerpted and in the crucial PATENT APPLICATION and elsewhere, Mullis dutifully and repeatedly CONFIRMED that PCR "would be valuable in diagnosing genetic diseases by looking into a person's genes. It would find infectious diseases by detecting the genes of pathogens that were difficult or impossible to culture."(EXACT QUOTE FROM MULLIS' BOOK)
What has you confused (and unfortunately, many other "health freedom" advocates as well) is that, *FOR A SPECIFIC APPLICATION (SO-CALLED "HIV INFECTION")*, Mullis felt the PCR was "unnecessary" because he believed that so-called "HIV" was too weak. Mullis also was indeed a VIRUS PUSHER. So, as a firm believer in virology, Mullis believed that "HIV" exists but in "very miniscule amounts".
However, among other things, Mullis nevertheless BELIEVED THAT PCR CAN *DETECT* "THIS VIRUS IN YOU" ("HIV") and that "PCR CAN DO" so "down to a single molecule". MULLIS said all of THOSE WORDS, too, along with the MISINTERPRETED quote that PCR "doesn't tell you that you're sick, and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was gonna hurt you or anything like that"! (A REALLY SCIENTIFIC PRONOUNCEMENT if there ever was ONE...!)
These negative comments Mullis made about a SPECIFIC APPLICATION ("HIV DETECTION") of the PCR are now frequently misinterpreted. Nevertheless, they were a slight of hand verbally speaking, performed by the "eccentric" magician (i.e., FRAUD) Mullis, so it takes some SHARP minds to catch the fraud. And again, ALL of these "quotes" from Mullis were made WAY BACK in the 1990s when PCR was being used to detect ONLY ONE VIRUS, so-called "HIV"....
Please see my analyses for more insights into what Mullis did and said and what he meant for our old "AIDS" dissident movement:
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes but occur in the presence of the phantom thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count and blame those deaths on the phantom not the treatment.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
Probably doesn’t help that they’re indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth through their state sponsored propaganda/educational system, social media, and TV.
Their ego always seems to get in the way as well, especially the more “education” they have. 😂 refusing to believe that it’s possible that they’ve believed lies.
Men much smarter than I often fall the hardest, and are the blindest. We got a firsthand account of this during the latest false flag pandemic. Only the doctors who were ready to retire and actually had morals stood up, while everyone else just followed what they were told to do, like a bunch of lemmings, and the populace never question anyone when they have an MD behind their name, to their own demise.
They need to learn the lesson clearly given in God’s Word:
2 Chronicles 16:12 (KJV)
And Asa in the thirty and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease [was] exceeding [great]: yet in his disease he sought not to the LORD, but to the physicians.
2 Chronicles 16:13 (KJV) And Asa slept with his fathers, and died in the one and fortieth year of his reign.
And the middle chapter and verse of the entire Bible:
Psalms 118:8 (KJV) [It is] better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.
Then you admit to not knowing the bible? Because i knew those teachings from my grade school classrooms in the church/cult basement that put me on the path to becoming a Christ loving atheist.
Perhaps you should study the Bible more. It might turn you into an atheist like me.
While they were enjoying themselves, some of the wicked men of the city surrounded the house. Pounding on the door, they shouted to the old man who owned the house, “Bring out the man who came to your house so we can have sex with him.”
23 The owner of the house went outside and said to them, “No, my friends, don’t be so vile. Since this man is my guest, don’t do this outrageous thing. 24 Look, here is my virgin daughter, and his concubine. I will bring them out to you now, and you can use them and do to them whatever you wish. But as for this man, don’t do such an outrageous thing.”
25 But the men would not listen to him. So the man took his concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go. 26 At daybreak the woman went back to the house where her master was staying, fell down at the door and lay there until daylight.
27 When her master got up in the morning and opened the door of the house and stepped out to continue on his way, there lay his concubine, fallen in the doorway of the house, with her hands on the threshold. 28 He said to her, “Get up; let’s go.” But there was no answer. Then the man put her on his donkey and set out for home.
29 When he reached home, he took a knife and cut up his concubine, limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of Israel.
It amazes me how many mindless people can’t recognize that beLIEf in an “all powerful creator” is a tool created, designed and used as a manipulative tool to control the mindless masses.
I am a goat herder. Like the ones who wrote the often drug induced ramblings you call the infallible word of god. A few years ago a very intelligent, personable goat began losing use of his back legs. Science showed us that this friendly vegetarian had apparently while grazing accidentally ingested a snail that was infected with a microscopic worm that when transferred to the goat infected and began eating his spinal column slowly paralyzing him.
Why would your all knowing, all loving, all powerful creator create that microscopic worm?
Why would your “all powerful creator” allow children-innocent children to be born with terminal cancer? Or with their heart outside of their body?
What sort of psychopath do you worship?
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Epicurus
btw… being that i am the first and only in my family name history to have not been baptized and raised Roman Catholic you very shallow reference to child sexual abuse would qualify you for Jesus to condemn you to having a millstone cast about your neck and thrown into the sea.
So Pr Luc Montagnier co discovered the "HIV virus" and got a Nobel price for it. Then Kary Mullis invented the PCR test and got a Nobel price for it! Later Mullis realized that the "HIV virus" was a hoax and got sidelined for saying it. Then Pr Montagnier use PCR to transmit DNA via the Internet and got sidelined for saying it! Then Kary Mullis died in 2019 just before the COV19 hoax that use the PCR test to fake a pandemic. Then Pr Montagnier died in 2022 after denouncing the COV19 hoax! Karma is b*tch and the Universe like a good joke, you can't make up that kind of sh*t!
At first I thought he died at right the exact time, since his invention, as it states on the package, is not meant to detect illness. In fact it is meant to reproduce particles of DNA (as far as I understood). So now even that premise seems to be inexistent. A fake test to test for a fake illness. Nothing reads better than real life. Has any writer ever come up with something this crazy? No one would read the book LOL
I would be hesitant to conclude these globalist stooges like Mullis and Montagnier actually died. Is there proof of a body open to public inspection? They were fake "discoverers" and fake antagonists that served well. They more likely went underground to get them out of public view.
PCR has been used to identify infections such as measles and whooping cough (these are the only ones I know of, there are undoubtedly more). So . . . we should be sceptical of all govt. claims of outbreaks.
The "whooping cough" epidemic "detected" by PCR was admitted to be fake, too - the actual throat samples all failed to culture the pertussis bacteria. So it's even in the public record that PCR can make 100% fake "outbreaks."
Interesting! Perhaps Kary "invented" the PCR test as a tool for the globalists to discover non-existent illnesses. Tom Cowan has poured scorn on the test as well.
I have used DNA matches as evidence in a number of criminal cases. I am only now becoming curious as to how real the science is and what they are comparing when declaring a high percentage of probability that the chemicals from a person's body match the chemicals found on a gun, for instance. I am thankful that I never based an entire case on DNA evidence, but I know of several that excluded a likely suspect because the DNA wasn't a match.
Hi Sean, Interesting. I have lots of information that I will be writing up in a few articles soon, specifically about Forensics.
My overarching feeling based on theoretical and preliminary experiential observations are that sequencing and PCR are measuring *something*. It is possible to tell the difference between small pools of samples, especially when lots of other information is available. However I don't think it is measuring, certainly not something as specific as an exact "code or sequence" that is an exact unique thing to each individual.
I agree that they are testing something, and it must be fairly accurate otherwise defense attorneys would be screaming about it, but just brushing up I learned that the STRs (short tandem repeats) used as the basis for distinguishing individuals, are chosen and amplified using PCR. I have had a number of cases where DNA testing was not able to identify a suspect because there were too many contributors. The results would often say that there were at least 3 male contributors, etc.
it is quite for sure that Nobel prizes are just some sort of giveaways, no matter what the person did or did not do to merit it. I remember reading how nurse (later doctor) Budwig was nominated multiple times, for developing her procedure to heal cancer. She never got it. And this year, two who helped develop the murderous mRNA got it and came to receive it in masks, which made them utterly stupid as everyone by now who is not retarded knows masks are useless
Remember when Barack Obama got the Noble Peace Prize just for being elected? Then he went on to start more shit and bomb more people than his predecessor. Good ol' Bombs Away Barry. Too bad he's leaving office soon.
Yep, PCR and genetics are treated as if the data is digital but it's analog and the more copies and modifications done, the more noise ends up in the signal.
Mr. Andrews, I continue to be grateful for your explanation of the PCR process. I once undertook a research into how it worked, and found contradictions. I quit, hoping someone would do the job for me. I still seek an explanation of what PCR does and how that is appropropriate for the non-technical reader. Lately I've been distracted by claims that genetic sequences and PCR tests based on them are all accomplished with software. Again, a non-technical explanation will be greatly appreciated. (I'm not expecting you to produce one, but perhaps you can forward me to somone who has.)
That Is exactly what I will be doing in all of my upcoming articles… I am totally focused on the PCR process and hope to boil it down into it’s most easily understandable principles to show that it is bogus.
well sir, I have to say, having read through this article and a lot of the comments, that my head has exploded...
just when you think you understand something, turns out you don't and for that matter, maybe what Mr. Lewicky taught me in grade 12 biology wasn't all true after all😅 I feel like I thought I was playing checkers when all along it was really 5d chess🤦🏻♀️😅
Flaws In The Coronavirus Pandemic Theory published by David Crowe March/June 2020. See Understanding Rt-PCR on page 13 but the entire paper is a must read. Note the conclusion predicted end of the “pandemic” will be credited to a hastily produced “vaccine”. http://saveelsobrante.net/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
“I knew computer programming, and from that I understood the power of a reiterative mathematical procedure. That's where you apply some process to a starting number to obtain a new number, and then you apply the same process to the new number, and so on. If the process is multiplication by two, then the result of many cycles is an exponential increase…”
Mullis is clumsily describing a basic computer programming process called recursion. It’s an algorithm/program that makes a call to itself, passing a variable from the current iteration to the next. Recursion is how to think about how AI “learns.” It takes what it knows from a previous iteration and applies that knowledge to the current process. Computers are great tools. They enable you to arrive at the wrong conclusion faster.
My question is how do they control these replicative chemical processes? The number of cycles. How do they know?
This is the part that I am at… funnily enough slaving away talking to AI trying to get to the bottom of all of the very overly complicated “chemistry” that quickly deviates away from chemistry and into an even more spurious “electrostatic” charge computational modelling realm…
all very tenuous but will be writing alot of articles on this in the near future
I agree, science deals in ‘make believe’ or magic tricks, is my take away from my research too.
I was just looking at vitamin C and the evidence it does anything. The playbook the criminal class use to play out their ruses: they don’t measure the thing eg Vit C, they use a proxy, usually an enzyme precursor or like, they make assumptions upon assumptions without establishing definitive proof.
I was thinking for sodium ascorbate, it’s the sodium that does the work.
[Hydration not oxygenation underpins our physiology. I’ve dismissed the gaseous exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide as a fraud. We are not machines using gases of combustion and exhaust. Hydration equals SALT plus water. SALT plus water being the elixir of life.]
I compared scurvy with type 2 diabetes and the symptoms were very similar. The salt restriction directives that arrived in the early 80s have massively increased the numbers of T2 diabetes sufferers.
Chronic dehydration leads to adrenal management because the adrenals manage all emergencies. Chronic adrenal management leads to increased cortisol levels. Cortisol raises blood glucose levels.
Salt brings hydration and rests the adrenals.
Salt turns off the RAAS.
Sailors were probably on strict water rations and alcohol rations cause dehydration. Dehydration via the adrenals again, causes stress intolerance, this would limit the chance of mutiny on board a ship and help ensure compliance.
Science and medicine is littered with malfeasant mis-directs. The people must weed them out. Peer review is an expert gatekeeping activity for the criminal class.
I think you see the same story with all "essential" vitamins. The scientists claim to have isolated a particular molecule but it is always whole food and lifestyle that cures quicker and more completely. For example, Szent-Gyorgi was able to reverse scurvy much faster by giving patients raw citrus mash than with synthetic vitamin C. Or just getting adequate sunlight seems to prevent the problems a doctor would prescribe "vitamin D" for.
I like your style of writing, but conversations with AI are not very meaningful. LLMs tell you what you want to hear (they predict what makes sense given your input). Unless they are censored - then they spit out what the censors wanted.
Thank you. I have no doubt that AI is just crawling the pool of already censored opinions and practices namely Google Scholar... But this is where I would get all of my information from anyway.... finding inconsistencies and and contradictions in THEIR science as a starting point for investigation.
There's something so strange about Mullis' biography - like it was written by a group of TV script writers. He comes across as a complete mediocrity and midwit yet he somehow stumbled from success to stunning success throughout his academic and professional career.
I also just remembered he was published in Nature in 1968. For some reason, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world published a 23-year-old biology grad student's ruminations on an obscure topic in cosmology. It makes zero sense.
Do you have a theory for all this? Like was Mullis groomed from an early age for this role? Was he just really lucky? Did he come from a powerful and connected family or something?
For sure.. I would have thought he would have been "part of the club" to be such an obvious numbnuts but get the highest prizes in science... useful idiots..
1) Has anyone actually tried to find out if PCR really does create millions of copies of the same molecule? You would have to start with a few micrograms of an amino acid or a peptide for example and see if the magic machine can really do the Jesus miracle. So 1 micrograms x 1 million = 1 gram of exact copies.
2) When a material is being created, copied or polymerised there must be raw material to feed the reaction. For example, to create polystyrene you have to feed in styrene! What is the "food' used in PCR?
Another analogy: a printer cannot just copy an image out of nothing - it needs materials and other inputs: ink, paper, machinery, electricity and humans pressing buttons. What is the "ink & paper" for PCR?
Hey Dave, you make some brilliant points I will try and address them briefly, but I will be doing numerous articles on all of this for the forseeable as the PCR test is my main focus.
1. I highly doubt it,largely because is impossible to verify with their own techniques a quantity. They claim that a band on a gel in electrophoresis will tell them the "size" in bps of copied dna... yet this is logically flawed... there is no way to tell that it is not just double the amount of half of the size/weight of DNA and all iterations in between if that makes sense?
2. Well they add dNTPs which are essentially free nucleotides.. they infact add ALL of the necessary ingredients to create the product without the need for a sample to produce the results... sounds alot like the cell culture isolation right?
For those of you who weren't aware of the origin of the "Nobel Peace Prize"
Here you go:-
"The Nobel Peace Prize (Swedish and Norwegian: Nobels fredspris) is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Swedish industrialist, inventor, and armaments (military weapons and equipment) manufacturer Alfred Nobel, along with the prizes in Chemistry, Physics, Physiology or Medicine, and Literature. Since March 1901,[9] it has been awarded annually (with some exceptions) to people who have "done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."[10] The Oxford Dictionary of Contemporary History describes it as "the most prestigious prize in the world." - Wikipedia
And the prize is awarded for:-
"Outstanding contributions to peace: arms reduction, international cooperation, and organisations contributing to peace, and human rights contributions to peace"
Anyone feel the same sense of irony as I do?
I'd be confident in saying, anyone awarded this pile of crap, is likely an agent of deception.
This is quickly becoming my favorite substack to read! I am writing about similar issues - check out AlphaFold Nobel Prize bullshit for example. Also, X-Ray crystallography, on which a lot of molecular shapes are claimed is a bit of a scam artistry, albeit not as blatant as the PCR. The shapes are claimed based on solid crystals, only for chemicals that can be cajoled into crystallization. Then it's claimed the same in liquid form. LOL.
Just my 2 cents…
Kary HATED Toni Fauci, and publicly called him out as a fraud, and in the old interviews that I watched, He openly admitted that his pcr test wasn’t a diagnostic test, and should never be used for such.
He was mad that his test was being used to con people into believing that they were hiv positive, and didn’t hold back when the topic was ever brought up.
This is why I personally believe he was taken out just before they kicked off their fake pandemic. They knew that he hated Fauci and wasn’t going to sit back and let them pull off another HIV=AIDS fraud based on his pcr tests.
They gas light everyone, but that tactic wasn’t going to work against a Nobel prize winner, who invented the very PCR test that they were using.
Yes Kary had personality flaws, and wasn’t perfect, but I personally didn’t see him as an evil man, or someone that would go along with the wicked agenda that these Jesuits just got away with for the 2nd time.
And finally we can’t blame Kary for winning a Nobel prize based on a bogus test. They’ve been passing these awards out to bullshit ass clowns for decades…I mean, Obama and Henry (burn in hell) Kissinger both were awarded one too, and I’m fairly confident in saying that if Hell has levels, Kissinger is on the bottom floor, and Obama will be joining him one day in the future.
I would agree that Kary doesn't come across as intrinsically evil, not like someone as purposefully deceptive as Fauci. I would say he was a useful idiot that got his financial and celebrity award he so desired from the establishment that needed his (fake) tool to fake pandemics.
That certainly does seem to be the case, and I think he realized that later in life.
Why are you harping on a guy that got killed by the people you're actually mad at? He was dangerous to the psychopathic genocidal maniacs and this is the guy you're going after?
Your impressions of the things that Mullis said are wrong. I was THERE when Mullis said the ONLY remarks that I could EVER find where he even REMOTELY attempted to address the utility of the PCR as a "diagnostic" test. First of all Mullis NEVER said PCR can NOT be used as a "diagnostic" test. In fact, Mullis NEVER claimed that PCR was not a "diagnostic" test. He never used that word- "diagnostic" in the negative. In fact, in his book that Jamie has excerpted and in the crucial PATENT APPLICATION and elsewhere, Mullis dutifully and repeatedly CONFIRMED that PCR "would be valuable in diagnosing genetic diseases by looking into a person's genes. It would find infectious diseases by detecting the genes of pathogens that were difficult or impossible to culture."(EXACT QUOTE FROM MULLIS' BOOK)
What has you confused (and unfortunately, many other "health freedom" advocates as well) is that, *FOR A SPECIFIC APPLICATION (SO-CALLED "HIV INFECTION")*, Mullis felt the PCR was "unnecessary" because he believed that so-called "HIV" was too weak. Mullis also was indeed a VIRUS PUSHER. So, as a firm believer in virology, Mullis believed that "HIV" exists but in "very miniscule amounts".
However, among other things, Mullis nevertheless BELIEVED THAT PCR CAN *DETECT* "THIS VIRUS IN YOU" ("HIV") and that "PCR CAN DO" so "down to a single molecule". MULLIS said all of THOSE WORDS, too, along with the MISINTERPRETED quote that PCR "doesn't tell you that you're sick, and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was gonna hurt you or anything like that"! (A REALLY SCIENTIFIC PRONOUNCEMENT if there ever was ONE...!)
These negative comments Mullis made about a SPECIFIC APPLICATION ("HIV DETECTION") of the PCR are now frequently misinterpreted. Nevertheless, they were a slight of hand verbally speaking, performed by the "eccentric" magician (i.e., FRAUD) Mullis, so it takes some SHARP minds to catch the fraud. And again, ALL of these "quotes" from Mullis were made WAY BACK in the 1990s when PCR was being used to detect ONLY ONE VIRUS, so-called "HIV"....
Please see my analyses for more insights into what Mullis did and said and what he meant for our old "AIDS" dissident movement:
1. https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/the-mullis-mirage
2. https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/was-mullis-more-machiavellian-than
Agreed. And one doesn't necessarily have to be nice to have integrity.
HIV=AIDS FAUCI’S 1st Fraud
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wy3frBacd2k&t=0s
Worth its weight in gold. This documentary will bring everyone up to speed, and show them parallels between both HIV=AIdS and COVID
Read the room.
Step1-Identify cluster of deaths.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes but occur in the presence of the phantom thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count and blame those deaths on the phantom not the treatment.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
For the common good.
How are people not seeing through this bs?
Because their faith is in man, instead of God.
Probably doesn’t help that they’re indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth through their state sponsored propaganda/educational system, social media, and TV.
Their ego always seems to get in the way as well, especially the more “education” they have. 😂 refusing to believe that it’s possible that they’ve believed lies.
Men much smarter than I often fall the hardest, and are the blindest. We got a firsthand account of this during the latest false flag pandemic. Only the doctors who were ready to retire and actually had morals stood up, while everyone else just followed what they were told to do, like a bunch of lemmings, and the populace never question anyone when they have an MD behind their name, to their own demise.
They need to learn the lesson clearly given in God’s Word:
2 Chronicles 16:12 (KJV)
And Asa in the thirty and ninth year of his reign was diseased in his feet, until his disease [was] exceeding [great]: yet in his disease he sought not to the LORD, but to the physicians.
2 Chronicles 16:13 (KJV) And Asa slept with his fathers, and died in the one and fortieth year of his reign.
And the middle chapter and verse of the entire Bible:
Psalms 118:8 (KJV) [It is] better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.
Interesting.. never knew that part in the bible… would probably agree. Thanks.
Then you admit to not knowing the bible? Because i knew those teachings from my grade school classrooms in the church/cult basement that put me on the path to becoming a Christ loving atheist.
Perhaps you should study the Bible more. It might turn you into an atheist like me.
who are you?
Judges 19 beginning verse 22.
While they were enjoying themselves, some of the wicked men of the city surrounded the house. Pounding on the door, they shouted to the old man who owned the house, “Bring out the man who came to your house so we can have sex with him.”
23 The owner of the house went outside and said to them, “No, my friends, don’t be so vile. Since this man is my guest, don’t do this outrageous thing. 24 Look, here is my virgin daughter, and his concubine. I will bring them out to you now, and you can use them and do to them whatever you wish. But as for this man, don’t do such an outrageous thing.”
25 But the men would not listen to him. So the man took his concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go. 26 At daybreak the woman went back to the house where her master was staying, fell down at the door and lay there until daylight.
27 When her master got up in the morning and opened the door of the house and stepped out to continue on his way, there lay his concubine, fallen in the doorway of the house, with her hands on the threshold. 28 He said to her, “Get up; let’s go.” But there was no answer. Then the man put her on his donkey and set out for home.
29 When he reached home, he took a knife and cut up his concubine, limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of Israel.
What’s your point? God doesn’t exist, because a man gave up his concubine, rather than his guests?
Did you see what happened to that city shortly thereafter? I suppose that wasn’t divine justice but a mere coincidence.
So you consider genocide to be “divine justice”. Says a LOT about you.
Now do Judges 19!!
Because if everyone just believes in and trusts the same Omni-impotent sky fairy as you do then all sickness and suffering will cease?
It amazes me how many intelligent people can’t differentiate between a religion and the reality of an all powerful creator.
Just because some priest fondled you when you were a little boy doesn’t mean God doesn’t exist.
How very Anti-Christ like of you.
It amazes me how many mindless people can’t recognize that beLIEf in an “all powerful creator” is a tool created, designed and used as a manipulative tool to control the mindless masses.
I am a goat herder. Like the ones who wrote the often drug induced ramblings you call the infallible word of god. A few years ago a very intelligent, personable goat began losing use of his back legs. Science showed us that this friendly vegetarian had apparently while grazing accidentally ingested a snail that was infected with a microscopic worm that when transferred to the goat infected and began eating his spinal column slowly paralyzing him.
Why would your all knowing, all loving, all powerful creator create that microscopic worm?
Why would your “all powerful creator” allow children-innocent children to be born with terminal cancer? Or with their heart outside of their body?
What sort of psychopath do you worship?
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Epicurus
btw… being that i am the first and only in my family name history to have not been baptized and raised Roman Catholic you very shallow reference to child sexual abuse would qualify you for Jesus to condemn you to having a millstone cast about your neck and thrown into the sea.
Like every medical proffesiinal knows
Preventative medicine kills return business
So Pr Luc Montagnier co discovered the "HIV virus" and got a Nobel price for it. Then Kary Mullis invented the PCR test and got a Nobel price for it! Later Mullis realized that the "HIV virus" was a hoax and got sidelined for saying it. Then Pr Montagnier use PCR to transmit DNA via the Internet and got sidelined for saying it! Then Kary Mullis died in 2019 just before the COV19 hoax that use the PCR test to fake a pandemic. Then Pr Montagnier died in 2022 after denouncing the COV19 hoax! Karma is b*tch and the Universe like a good joke, you can't make up that kind of sh*t!
At first I thought he died at right the exact time, since his invention, as it states on the package, is not meant to detect illness. In fact it is meant to reproduce particles of DNA (as far as I understood). So now even that premise seems to be inexistent. A fake test to test for a fake illness. Nothing reads better than real life. Has any writer ever come up with something this crazy? No one would read the book LOL
Right? It makes sense if you try to think like a cheating liar - when everything is fake, there are no lose ends that would expose the lie.
A full deck of joker cards all the way through - it's whatever you want it to be...
🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏
I would be hesitant to conclude these globalist stooges like Mullis and Montagnier actually died. Is there proof of a body open to public inspection? They were fake "discoverers" and fake antagonists that served well. They more likely went underground to get them out of public view.
I forgot to mention that the PCR test was widely use to fake the Plandemic!
PCR has been used to identify infections such as measles and whooping cough (these are the only ones I know of, there are undoubtedly more). So . . . we should be sceptical of all govt. claims of outbreaks.
The "whooping cough" epidemic "detected" by PCR was admitted to be fake, too - the actual throat samples all failed to culture the pertussis bacteria. So it's even in the public record that PCR can make 100% fake "outbreaks."
Interesting! Perhaps Kary "invented" the PCR test as a tool for the globalists to discover non-existent illnesses. Tom Cowan has poured scorn on the test as well.
I have used DNA matches as evidence in a number of criminal cases. I am only now becoming curious as to how real the science is and what they are comparing when declaring a high percentage of probability that the chemicals from a person's body match the chemicals found on a gun, for instance. I am thankful that I never based an entire case on DNA evidence, but I know of several that excluded a likely suspect because the DNA wasn't a match.
Hi Sean, Interesting. I have lots of information that I will be writing up in a few articles soon, specifically about Forensics.
My overarching feeling based on theoretical and preliminary experiential observations are that sequencing and PCR are measuring *something*. It is possible to tell the difference between small pools of samples, especially when lots of other information is available. However I don't think it is measuring, certainly not something as specific as an exact "code or sequence" that is an exact unique thing to each individual.
I agree that they are testing something, and it must be fairly accurate otherwise defense attorneys would be screaming about it, but just brushing up I learned that the STRs (short tandem repeats) used as the basis for distinguishing individuals, are chosen and amplified using PCR. I have had a number of cases where DNA testing was not able to identify a suspect because there were too many contributors. The results would often say that there were at least 3 male contributors, etc.
it is quite for sure that Nobel prizes are just some sort of giveaways, no matter what the person did or did not do to merit it. I remember reading how nurse (later doctor) Budwig was nominated multiple times, for developing her procedure to heal cancer. She never got it. And this year, two who helped develop the murderous mRNA got it and came to receive it in masks, which made them utterly stupid as everyone by now who is not retarded knows masks are useless
Remember when Barack Obama got the Noble Peace Prize just for being elected? Then he went on to start more shit and bomb more people than his predecessor. Good ol' Bombs Away Barry. Too bad he's leaving office soon.
Yep, PCR and genetics are treated as if the data is digital but it's analog and the more copies and modifications done, the more noise ends up in the signal.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/pcr-fails-logic-from-the-start-sorry
Copies of something you can't detect so you amplify it and then say that the result is what you couldn't detect in the first place. What a con.
ABRACADABRA 🪄
magic 😂
Yep. Similar to saying an ant, under a microscope, can destroy Manhattan
Mr. Andrews, I continue to be grateful for your explanation of the PCR process. I once undertook a research into how it worked, and found contradictions. I quit, hoping someone would do the job for me. I still seek an explanation of what PCR does and how that is appropropriate for the non-technical reader. Lately I've been distracted by claims that genetic sequences and PCR tests based on them are all accomplished with software. Again, a non-technical explanation will be greatly appreciated. (I'm not expecting you to produce one, but perhaps you can forward me to somone who has.)
That Is exactly what I will be doing in all of my upcoming articles… I am totally focused on the PCR process and hope to boil it down into it’s most easily understandable principles to show that it is bogus.
I look forward to it!!
well sir, I have to say, having read through this article and a lot of the comments, that my head has exploded...
just when you think you understand something, turns out you don't and for that matter, maybe what Mr. Lewicky taught me in grade 12 biology wasn't all true after all😅 I feel like I thought I was playing checkers when all along it was really 5d chess🤦🏻♀️😅
Flaws In The Coronavirus Pandemic Theory published by David Crowe March/June 2020. See Understanding Rt-PCR on page 13 but the entire paper is a must read. Note the conclusion predicted end of the “pandemic” will be credited to a hastily produced “vaccine”. http://saveelsobrante.net/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
“I knew computer programming, and from that I understood the power of a reiterative mathematical procedure. That's where you apply some process to a starting number to obtain a new number, and then you apply the same process to the new number, and so on. If the process is multiplication by two, then the result of many cycles is an exponential increase…”
Mullis is clumsily describing a basic computer programming process called recursion. It’s an algorithm/program that makes a call to itself, passing a variable from the current iteration to the next. Recursion is how to think about how AI “learns.” It takes what it knows from a previous iteration and applies that knowledge to the current process. Computers are great tools. They enable you to arrive at the wrong conclusion faster.
My question is how do they control these replicative chemical processes? The number of cycles. How do they know?
This is the part that I am at… funnily enough slaving away talking to AI trying to get to the bottom of all of the very overly complicated “chemistry” that quickly deviates away from chemistry and into an even more spurious “electrostatic” charge computational modelling realm…
all very tenuous but will be writing alot of articles on this in the near future
Hi Jamie
Great article.
I agree, science deals in ‘make believe’ or magic tricks, is my take away from my research too.
I was just looking at vitamin C and the evidence it does anything. The playbook the criminal class use to play out their ruses: they don’t measure the thing eg Vit C, they use a proxy, usually an enzyme precursor or like, they make assumptions upon assumptions without establishing definitive proof.
I was thinking for sodium ascorbate, it’s the sodium that does the work.
[Hydration not oxygenation underpins our physiology. I’ve dismissed the gaseous exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide as a fraud. We are not machines using gases of combustion and exhaust. Hydration equals SALT plus water. SALT plus water being the elixir of life.]
I compared scurvy with type 2 diabetes and the symptoms were very similar. The salt restriction directives that arrived in the early 80s have massively increased the numbers of T2 diabetes sufferers.
Chronic dehydration leads to adrenal management because the adrenals manage all emergencies. Chronic adrenal management leads to increased cortisol levels. Cortisol raises blood glucose levels.
Salt brings hydration and rests the adrenals.
Salt turns off the RAAS.
Sailors were probably on strict water rations and alcohol rations cause dehydration. Dehydration via the adrenals again, causes stress intolerance, this would limit the chance of mutiny on board a ship and help ensure compliance.
Science and medicine is littered with malfeasant mis-directs. The people must weed them out. Peer review is an expert gatekeeping activity for the criminal class.
Read my articles by clicking on my blue icon.
I think you see the same story with all "essential" vitamins. The scientists claim to have isolated a particular molecule but it is always whole food and lifestyle that cures quicker and more completely. For example, Szent-Gyorgi was able to reverse scurvy much faster by giving patients raw citrus mash than with synthetic vitamin C. Or just getting adequate sunlight seems to prevent the problems a doctor would prescribe "vitamin D" for.
Synthetic vs natural source
Natural always wins
Synthetic is usually backed by non-science, tenuous proxies to create links that wouldn’t satisfy scrutiny, so scrutiny must be thwarted.
It appears to be God vs man story.
They simply make natural more expensive to create a market for inferior products.
Hence the food technologists replace food with non-food.
I like your style of writing, but conversations with AI are not very meaningful. LLMs tell you what you want to hear (they predict what makes sense given your input). Unless they are censored - then they spit out what the censors wanted.
Thank you. I have no doubt that AI is just crawling the pool of already censored opinions and practices namely Google Scholar... But this is where I would get all of my information from anyway.... finding inconsistencies and and contradictions in THEIR science as a starting point for investigation.
I know JA already responded, but the purpose of it is to expose how AI works (pooled “knowledge” censorship included).
Thinking along those lines, this article is a two-fer, exposing both AI and PCR as deeply flawed tools
There's something so strange about Mullis' biography - like it was written by a group of TV script writers. He comes across as a complete mediocrity and midwit yet he somehow stumbled from success to stunning success throughout his academic and professional career.
I also just remembered he was published in Nature in 1968. For some reason, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world published a 23-year-old biology grad student's ruminations on an obscure topic in cosmology. It makes zero sense.
Do you have a theory for all this? Like was Mullis groomed from an early age for this role? Was he just really lucky? Did he come from a powerful and connected family or something?
For sure.. I would have thought he would have been "part of the club" to be such an obvious numbnuts but get the highest prizes in science... useful idiots..
There is alot more information about him here in this article written by Omar Jordan if interested https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fbpYott1Mdw_BuuiE6_rjO_7Xr5Z_PdoxtK3fNZI9Gc/edit?pli=1&tab=t.0
"I am not going to go through his entire book and pull it apart, largely because it is wank and tedious."
🤣🤣🤣🤣
1) Has anyone actually tried to find out if PCR really does create millions of copies of the same molecule? You would have to start with a few micrograms of an amino acid or a peptide for example and see if the magic machine can really do the Jesus miracle. So 1 micrograms x 1 million = 1 gram of exact copies.
2) When a material is being created, copied or polymerised there must be raw material to feed the reaction. For example, to create polystyrene you have to feed in styrene! What is the "food' used in PCR?
Another analogy: a printer cannot just copy an image out of nothing - it needs materials and other inputs: ink, paper, machinery, electricity and humans pressing buttons. What is the "ink & paper" for PCR?
I look forward to more! TX
Hey Dave, you make some brilliant points I will try and address them briefly, but I will be doing numerous articles on all of this for the forseeable as the PCR test is my main focus.
1. I highly doubt it,largely because is impossible to verify with their own techniques a quantity. They claim that a band on a gel in electrophoresis will tell them the "size" in bps of copied dna... yet this is logically flawed... there is no way to tell that it is not just double the amount of half of the size/weight of DNA and all iterations in between if that makes sense?
2. Well they add dNTPs which are essentially free nucleotides.. they infact add ALL of the necessary ingredients to create the product without the need for a sample to produce the results... sounds alot like the cell culture isolation right?
Cheers J
Arthur C Clarke was a pedo so not a great choice for writing the forward for your book. Sheesh
For those of you who weren't aware of the origin of the "Nobel Peace Prize"
Here you go:-
"The Nobel Peace Prize (Swedish and Norwegian: Nobels fredspris) is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by the will of Swedish industrialist, inventor, and armaments (military weapons and equipment) manufacturer Alfred Nobel, along with the prizes in Chemistry, Physics, Physiology or Medicine, and Literature. Since March 1901,[9] it has been awarded annually (with some exceptions) to people who have "done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."[10] The Oxford Dictionary of Contemporary History describes it as "the most prestigious prize in the world." - Wikipedia
And the prize is awarded for:-
"Outstanding contributions to peace: arms reduction, international cooperation, and organisations contributing to peace, and human rights contributions to peace"
Anyone feel the same sense of irony as I do?
I'd be confident in saying, anyone awarded this pile of crap, is likely an agent of deception.
No two ways about it
Let me add to this.
Who won the nobel prize in physiology or medicine 2023?
None other than Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman for their contributions to the development of effective mRNA vaccines against covid-19
Says all you need to know, really
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/press-release/
This is quickly becoming my favorite substack to read! I am writing about similar issues - check out AlphaFold Nobel Prize bullshit for example. Also, X-Ray crystallography, on which a lot of molecular shapes are claimed is a bit of a scam artistry, albeit not as blatant as the PCR. The shapes are claimed based on solid crystals, only for chemicals that can be cajoled into crystallization. Then it's claimed the same in liquid form. LOL.
Prions...another figment of someone's imagination?
Correct