Excellent research. Chemotherapy is like firing a shotgun at someone to fix their bullet wound.
In the end it's all about wealth transfer. Give the useless people just enough injected poisons from birth to make them chronically ill (but not quite enough to kill them yet) to insure a continual trickle of wealth transfer - the health care dividend for the controllers. Then the people work hard paying taxes and accumulating wealth. Continue with antibiotics and other maintenance drugs. Start the final wealth extraction process as retirement approaches with long term care insurance. Then when they get seriously ill, extract all the wealth back by draining their savings with expensive drugs like mustard gas, that don't work but instead kill off the penniless patients to minimise any further liability. There are other kinds of lifetime wealth extraction schemes, like student loans and inflation, but poisoning the population from birth works best.
I would suggest that this practice of poisoning people for their "health" is indistinguishable from the ancient practice of sorcery. Two thousand years ago and more there was a Greek word for such a poison, φάρμακον, which transliterates as "pharmakon". It is found in early versions of the Hippocratic Oath (swearing to the gods not to use "deadly poisons").
The word can easily be remembered today using the memory hook "Pharma Con".
"If the poison is in the dose, how much Arsenic are you willing to take? Most sensible people would say ZERO. Well there you go, we have found that because this particular Poison hasn’t been touted as a “Cure” all of a sudden the dose isn’t important, funny that ey!"
Actually Jamie, arsenic trioxide is claimed to be a "cure" for leukemia.
Another outta-the-ballpark hit! I do ponder about "rat poison," though. Cat poison - quite lethal to cats - is chocolate... So I struggle with the idea that because something kills one animal it means it's poisonous to all others...
Still and all... Has anyOne done any experiments to see if it applies to Humans as it does to rats?
You can find a few case studies on Vit D3 poisoning in humans. Here, a breastfeeding infant was given Vit D3 drops (yes, modern medicine insists that human breast milk doesn't have enough "vitamins" to sustain baby and you need to give them vitamin drops) that were mislabeled, resulting in 50,000 IU/day for 2 months (or 1.25 milligrams per day) resulting in severe hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis (though not death). There's another paper on pubmed detailing a man in his 20's who consumed 100,000 IU/day for 2 months (2.5 mg) resulting in similar conditions. But not a lot of studies available.
Rhesus monkeys fed 50,000 IU/day - 200,000 IU/day (1.25mg - 5mg) died after 16-160 days after such supplemented diet. I suppose this means the LD50 (over an extended period, not all in one go) amounts to 0.18 mg/kg - 0.73 mg/kg. I'm sort of too lazy to really delve entirely into the paper but there you go.
The original papers claiming Vit D3 is necessary to prevent rickets were quite ridiculous (in my opinion). The chain of inference went:
* Infants who were exposed to sunlight "didn't get rickets" relative to infants who did not receive sunlight (did people isolate infants in indoor rooms with no sunlight in the early 20th century?)
* Ergo, sunlight did something to prevent rickets ergo sunlight produced some vitamin ergo it must be ultraviolet rays
* Feeding juvenile rats in the 1930s nothing but processed flour in total darkness and then sacrificing after some weeks to determine bone lesions and measuring total bone mass as weight of ashes after cremation compared to control rats (thus proving they "had rickets" via some lesions and reduced ash content as a proxy for relative bone weight when raised in total darkness and fed nothing but flour)
* Repeating said experiment adding olive oil and lard to diet and again noting development of "rickets"
* Shining ultraviolet rays onto olive oil and lard for a few hours and then feeding this to said rats and noting they supposedly had no lesions or lower bone weight and hence "didn't get rickets" and hence "vitamin D was in the irradiated fat"
Some time later a German chemist determined the chemical formula for cholecalciferol and the science claimed this developed after shining ultraviolet rays onto fats. Later an experiment in the 1960s "proved" this occurred in skin taken from a cadaver that was processed with chemicals after being exposed to ultraviolet rays by looking at various forms of spectroscopy in comparison to the synthetic cholecalciferol.
I find it quite hard to swallow, personally, as on the one hand we need ultraviolet rays hitting our skin to "make the Vit D3" but on the other hand that gives us skin cancer so we need to slather chemicals all over ourselves in the sun to prevent the dangerous ultraviolet from killing us. Wonky thinking IMO. And also, where are the ancient folk traditions of leaving your olive oil, tallow, and lard to bake in the hot sun for it to be "more nutritious"? Nobody does this. In fact this will make your oils and fats rancid hence most cultures put their oil into clay pots and such and store them in a cool dark place (like a pantry).
I simply believe they had bad experimental methodology.
The survival curves for most chemo treatments are so poor that it is clearly better to avoid the majority of them and just live well until the end, except for a few types you can cut out and get extra years, maybe skin cancer.
Testicular cancer is often cured by resection, if you are trans leaning, that could be a bonus (no offense intended).
Bladder cancer is "supposedly" treated with BCG bacteria intravesically. BCG is made from live bacteria. It is delivered to the bladder through a catheter, which causes your body to develop an immune response. This allows your immune system to fight....
Any knowledge about PrEP? It seems to be taken by a lot of gay men (and other groups) to save them from 'contracting' 'HIV'. (Yeah, I know, of course.) I've heard that it's some type of low dose of chemotherapy, taken on a daily basis. Any idea if that's right? If so, does that mean they're taking a pill of mustard gas every day?
Just had a brief look and yes with some Chemo they share exactly the same claimed mechanisms where they claim to stop DNA replication by competing with active site of enzymes so intrinsically will just be charged IONs.
Based on the dating app I sometimes glance at, I’d say that by far the majority of gay men here in Germany - maybe something like 80-90%, I’d estimate - are taking this poison every day.
Yes, unfortunately so. My business partner who writes for the HIV channel who was diagnosed pos in 2004 but has since seen the fraud and dropped ARTs. He says that those apps have drop down menus to select and advertise what drugs you are on. He says he has tried to engage people on there to raise awareness of the side effects of these drugs but people have a lot of cognitive dissonance. He says you can tell people on these drugs as they start retaining water and fat pooling in limbs and stomach and face. We are working hard behind the scenes to combat this evil machinery.
But will look into Prep specifically. I have looked into ARTs and they all chelate magnesium or essential ions.. however I don't think they are similar to chemo. Will have a look at Prep.
Excellent research. Chemotherapy is like firing a shotgun at someone to fix their bullet wound.
In the end it's all about wealth transfer. Give the useless people just enough injected poisons from birth to make them chronically ill (but not quite enough to kill them yet) to insure a continual trickle of wealth transfer - the health care dividend for the controllers. Then the people work hard paying taxes and accumulating wealth. Continue with antibiotics and other maintenance drugs. Start the final wealth extraction process as retirement approaches with long term care insurance. Then when they get seriously ill, extract all the wealth back by draining their savings with expensive drugs like mustard gas, that don't work but instead kill off the penniless patients to minimise any further liability. There are other kinds of lifetime wealth extraction schemes, like student loans and inflation, but poisoning the population from birth works best.
I would suggest that this practice of poisoning people for their "health" is indistinguishable from the ancient practice of sorcery. Two thousand years ago and more there was a Greek word for such a poison, φάρμακον, which transliterates as "pharmakon". It is found in early versions of the Hippocratic Oath (swearing to the gods not to use "deadly poisons").
The word can easily be remembered today using the memory hook "Pharma Con".
Thank you so much for this article jamie, I wrote about cancer here : https://telestai.substack.com/p/cancer-a-dissociative-identity-disorder
It's funny to be alive in a time of evil witchcraft mainstreaming it's madness into the consciousness of the day.
I feel kind of Aztecish.
Leeches seem like advanced future science by comparison.
"If the poison is in the dose, how much Arsenic are you willing to take? Most sensible people would say ZERO. Well there you go, we have found that because this particular Poison hasn’t been touted as a “Cure” all of a sudden the dose isn’t important, funny that ey!"
Actually Jamie, arsenic trioxide is claimed to be a "cure" for leukemia.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/arsenic-trioxide-intravenous-route/description/drg-20062068
And back in the day salvarsan and neosalvarsan (arsphenamine and neoarsphenamine) were used to "cure" syphilis.
Lol... didn't know that.thanks... well there you go.
Another outta-the-ballpark hit! I do ponder about "rat poison," though. Cat poison - quite lethal to cats - is chocolate... So I struggle with the idea that because something kills one animal it means it's poisonous to all others...
Still and all... Has anyOne done any experiments to see if it applies to Humans as it does to rats?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25636720/
You can find a few case studies on Vit D3 poisoning in humans. Here, a breastfeeding infant was given Vit D3 drops (yes, modern medicine insists that human breast milk doesn't have enough "vitamins" to sustain baby and you need to give them vitamin drops) that were mislabeled, resulting in 50,000 IU/day for 2 months (or 1.25 milligrams per day) resulting in severe hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis (though not death). There's another paper on pubmed detailing a man in his 20's who consumed 100,000 IU/day for 2 months (2.5 mg) resulting in similar conditions. But not a lot of studies available.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4340673/
(paper available via paywall or on sci-hub)
Rhesus monkeys fed 50,000 IU/day - 200,000 IU/day (1.25mg - 5mg) died after 16-160 days after such supplemented diet. I suppose this means the LD50 (over an extended period, not all in one go) amounts to 0.18 mg/kg - 0.73 mg/kg. I'm sort of too lazy to really delve entirely into the paper but there you go.
The original papers claiming Vit D3 is necessary to prevent rickets were quite ridiculous (in my opinion). The chain of inference went:
* Infants who were exposed to sunlight "didn't get rickets" relative to infants who did not receive sunlight (did people isolate infants in indoor rooms with no sunlight in the early 20th century?)
* Ergo, sunlight did something to prevent rickets ergo sunlight produced some vitamin ergo it must be ultraviolet rays
* Feeding juvenile rats in the 1930s nothing but processed flour in total darkness and then sacrificing after some weeks to determine bone lesions and measuring total bone mass as weight of ashes after cremation compared to control rats (thus proving they "had rickets" via some lesions and reduced ash content as a proxy for relative bone weight when raised in total darkness and fed nothing but flour)
* Repeating said experiment adding olive oil and lard to diet and again noting development of "rickets"
* Shining ultraviolet rays onto olive oil and lard for a few hours and then feeding this to said rats and noting they supposedly had no lesions or lower bone weight and hence "didn't get rickets" and hence "vitamin D was in the irradiated fat"
Some time later a German chemist determined the chemical formula for cholecalciferol and the science claimed this developed after shining ultraviolet rays onto fats. Later an experiment in the 1960s "proved" this occurred in skin taken from a cadaver that was processed with chemicals after being exposed to ultraviolet rays by looking at various forms of spectroscopy in comparison to the synthetic cholecalciferol.
I find it quite hard to swallow, personally, as on the one hand we need ultraviolet rays hitting our skin to "make the Vit D3" but on the other hand that gives us skin cancer so we need to slather chemicals all over ourselves in the sun to prevent the dangerous ultraviolet from killing us. Wonky thinking IMO. And also, where are the ancient folk traditions of leaving your olive oil, tallow, and lard to bake in the hot sun for it to be "more nutritious"? Nobody does this. In fact this will make your oils and fats rancid hence most cultures put their oil into clay pots and such and store them in a cool dark place (like a pantry).
I simply believe they had bad experimental methodology.
Thank You so much!
The survival curves for most chemo treatments are so poor that it is clearly better to avoid the majority of them and just live well until the end, except for a few types you can cut out and get extra years, maybe skin cancer.
Testicular cancer is often cured by resection, if you are trans leaning, that could be a bonus (no offense intended).
Bladder cancer is "supposedly" treated with BCG bacteria intravesically. BCG is made from live bacteria. It is delivered to the bladder through a catheter, which causes your body to develop an immune response. This allows your immune system to fight....
Did you miss this Jamie? Standard textbook for medical students and beyond:
Goodman & Gilman's: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 14th Edition
https://accesspharmacy.mhmedical.com/book.aspx?bookID=3191
Any knowledge about PrEP? It seems to be taken by a lot of gay men (and other groups) to save them from 'contracting' 'HIV'. (Yeah, I know, of course.) I've heard that it's some type of low dose of chemotherapy, taken on a daily basis. Any idea if that's right? If so, does that mean they're taking a pill of mustard gas every day?
Hi, I have a channel dedicated to learning about the HIV fraud and the dangerous drugs they are giving people.
https://open.substack.com/pub/controlstudies/p/nodrugsneeded?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=27c5yh
https://open.substack.com/pub/hivcontrolstudies?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=27c5yh
Just had a brief look and yes with some Chemo they share exactly the same claimed mechanisms where they claim to stop DNA replication by competing with active site of enzymes so intrinsically will just be charged IONs.
Based on the dating app I sometimes glance at, I’d say that by far the majority of gay men here in Germany - maybe something like 80-90%, I’d estimate - are taking this poison every day.
Yes, unfortunately so. My business partner who writes for the HIV channel who was diagnosed pos in 2004 but has since seen the fraud and dropped ARTs. He says that those apps have drop down menus to select and advertise what drugs you are on. He says he has tried to engage people on there to raise awareness of the side effects of these drugs but people have a lot of cognitive dissonance. He says you can tell people on these drugs as they start retaining water and fat pooling in limbs and stomach and face. We are working hard behind the scenes to combat this evil machinery.
But will look into Prep specifically. I have looked into ARTs and they all chelate magnesium or essential ions.. however I don't think they are similar to chemo. Will have a look at Prep.