@drmikeyeadon .. For years I've recommended you read this chap's work on BSE .. finally someone has usefully summarised it!! Mark was a real hero and a tragic loss when he died so young.
So, instead of injecting toxic slurry into the cow’s, and waiting for swelling - to determine ‘mad cow disease’.!!
Why not put the wretched creatures on a ferry, and take them out to the middle of the loch; with some untried Witches, and drop them all into the murky depths.
Obvs, if they all drown; then they didn’t have the ‘disease’, and anything that survives, is so obviously a screaming pathogenic, toxic, spike protein spreading killer, that we’d have no option but to exterminate them asap. Simple. Follow the Science. Guys.
Dementia, oddly enough, is in the top five list of UK deaths per year; alongside the usual suspects: the big C, heart disease, and death by doctors (Iatrogenesis). Medical staff went on strike in the seventies, Israel was one of the places; they closed hospitals and practices. And the death rate for those months actually went down, dramatically.!!
And I remember my pet Cheetah testing positive for BSE proteins, albeit asymptomatically (he was feeling great, no symptoms, fit as a fiddle) and as long as we kept him away from the Ostriches and the local Vole population, he was sweet as a nut. Played havoc with the fallow deer population, though.
Such a shame about Mark Purdey, what a fabulously bright guy. And pretty much all over the pernicious shenanigans that the ‘authorities’ would have us believe to be the gospel truth. They absolutely hate us, with a vengeance.
I’ll be in the Carcassonne region, Jamie, for a week or so in early June. If I bump into you, I’ll deffo buy you a beer.
Hey Dean.. Yes it is all so ridiculous when you lay it out in front of you. Carcassone is beautiful.. I am a little north of there. drop me a line closer to the time. J
Great reading, so tragic! Also the movie Dark Waters shows a cattle owner's cows going mad from Teflon/PFOA poisoning from dupont dumping chemicals on/near his property. That turned the light on for me, I worked in my family's ranching business during the "mad cow" madness.
I get assistance from copilot AI to make sure that I properly understand your message and the comments made by other subscribers who endeavour to clarify and enhance your message. This works for me and may be helpful to others who read this section for this purpose.
I will split the post in two and apologise in advance for length of each. Jamie I will desist from these in the future if you don't like my approach.
Post 1
Please analyse Andrews article and summarize it into 10 key points he has identified from the book, what he believes the author of the book was struggling to clarify without being able to break free from his indoctrinated position (germ theory) and all the elements that Andrews has extrapolated into his ideation, namely from the terrain perspective.
Here’s a summary of the 10 key points Jamie Andrews identifies in his article—as extracted from his analysis of the book—and how he reads the author’s struggle to break free from an entrenched, germ-theory mindset by instead hinting at a terrain-based (environmental/charge-imbalance) perspective:
1. **Entrenchment in Mainstream Science:**
Andrews observes that the book’s author, Mark Purdey, was initially a complete believer in the prevailing germ theory. This unwavering commitment meant he interpreted all phenomena—like BSE and CJD—within the confines of prion or pathogenic protein models, which limited his ability to fully question or depart from established narratives.
2. **Chemical Toxicity as the Underlying Cause:**
Purdey’s extensive field observations led him to focus on chemicals rather than infectious proteins. In particular, he noted the timeline and effects of organophosphate pesticides (e.g., Phosmet) on livestock, proposing that chemical poisoning explains the onset of neurological disease better than the accepted prion hypothesis.
3. **Contradictions in Selective Chemical Action:**
Andrews highlights a key point: if the mainstream narrative is correct about misfolded proteins or toxins selectively attacking cells, then the claimed “selectivity” is chemically and logically dubious. The idea that the same chemical can consistently target only certain species or cell types doesn’t add up—an issue Purdey’s findings expose.
4. **Metal Ion Imbalances in the Environment:**
A prominent observation in the book is that areas with clusters of neurological diseases (like CJD) show abnormal levels of metal ions in the soil—such as high levels of manganese, barium, strontium and deficiencies in copper, zinc, sulphur, and selenium. This points to an environmental factor at play, rather than simply an infectious agent.
5. **A Shift Toward a Terrain Perspective:**
Instead of viewing the body as an isolated battleground for pathogens (as germ theory would dictate), Purdey’s evidence opens up the idea that the “terrain” itself—soil chemistry, industrial pollutants, and ionic charge imbalances—could be at the heart of neurodegenerative diseases. Andrews sees this as a more holistic and perhaps accurate approach.
6. **Critique of Enzymatic Explanations:**
Andrews is critical of the enzyme-based explanations (involving “bad proteins” and selective enzyme disruptions) used in mainstream science. He suggests that many of these tests, sometimes as arbitrary as measuring reaction rates, fail to capture the real, underlying “charge” imbalances that might be causing the damage.
7. **Failure to Fully Translate Field Data:**
Despite gathering a mountain of epidemiological and experimental observations, Purdey never fully escapes the confines of his ingrained scientific framework. He often reinterprets his own radical findings in language that still aligns with traditional germ theory, thereby losing some of the transformative potential of his discoveries.
8. **Inadequacy of Standard Laboratory Tests:**
The article points out that lab tests—such as those measuring enzyme activity—are not robust enough to detect what might actually be happening: disturbances in ionic or charge balance. Andrews argues that more direct measurements (like mass spectrometry of charge) would capture what the standard tests miss.
9. **The Tragic Irony of Personal Sacrifice:**
Purdey’s life and early demise are cast as a tragedy. Andrews sees it as emblematic of how holding onto orthodox paradigms can have very real, tragic personal consequences—even for someone who gathered compelling evidence for an alternative explanation. Purdey’s struggle illustrates the cost of scientific repression and the inability to fully break from indoctrinated views.
10. **A Call to Embrace a Paradigm Shift:**
Ultimately, Andrews extrapolates that Purdey’s work—and his internal conflict between traditional germ theory and the emerging terrain perspective—should serve as a catalyst for wider rethinking. The suggestion is that understanding neurological diseases (and perhaps other conditions) might be better achieved by focusing on environmental factors and ionic imbalances rather than relying solely on pathogen-based explanations.
These points neatly capture how Andrews sees the book’s author wrestling with his legacy of mainstream scientific belief while uncovering evidence that hints at a fundamentally different, terrain-based approach to understanding disease. The tension between these worldviews forms the core of Andrews’ extrapolations and critique.
For theory of Herpes. I did some checking and found 5-HT4 seems to activate actylcholine and acetylcholine seems to activate herpes. People report getting herpes outbreak after drinking orange juice. Oranges contain hesperidin which is a 5-HT4 agonist. Additionally, people report that lysine stops herpes and arginine activates it. Lysine is 5-HT4 antagonist and arginine competes with lysine for transport into cells. Calcium ion channels also play a role. So, just off the top my head I would suspect that these biochemical pathways may be the real cause of herpes, combined with a gut microbiome causing a defect in certain hosts with host genetics that involve these biochemical pathways. Oranges are also high in arginine. I am still cautious out of respect for the unknown. The microbiome, nutritional status, host genetics and these biochemical pathways could explain the pathology. There may be host to host communication or exchange of microbiome and we should be cautious out of respect for the unknown, however all of this could be tested using the scientific method. I think the real question is, is it contagious no matter what the cause.
You could have Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) creating toxins which change gene expression of α-7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Virulence factors play a crucial role in UPEC's ability to cause disease. UPEC strains possess a plethora of both structural (as fimbriae, pili, curli, flagella) and secreted (toxins, iron-acquisition systems) virulence factors that contribute to their capacity to cause disease, although the ability to adhere to host epithelial cells in the urinary tract represents the most important determinant of pathogenicity. α-7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the trigeminal ganglia (where herpes is said to be dormant) could change gene expression. You could then try increasing Lactobacillus crispatus to crowd out the Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). People report herpes outbreak when they get stressed. When we get stress we release chatacholamines which are messenger molecules to the microbiome which increase their release of toxins or virulence factors. So, this could then change the gene expression of acetylcholine and cause an outbreak.
I know lots more folk with brain cancers in that area since then , sadly. Nowadays it is wifi and phone masts and constant phone use etc .. but also radon in some places .. and ridiculous overhead power lines . More recently the, ahem, medications have been adding to the issue .. but also the heavy metals in our increasingly plant based diets .. Fumes from wood burners have been getting a few of us quite sickly also. A lot of factors.
Another major (claimed) finding round about that time was that the biggest correlate for mental illness in rural areas was found to be 'drinking water from a home well or other local water source. The suggestion was that biological biofilm of various types was sickening people . This could be parasites, algal toxins amongst others .. The issue of lead or copper pipes wasn't factored in at the time as I recall, tho I'd have to go back and re read. Our water supply there was full of arsenic sadly so there were a great many factors to consider !! Don't think the professionals weren't considering a wide range of factors tho, they absolutely were . The range and depth of discussion was huge. Piezoelectricity, sunspot activity .. everything short of alien abduction was being seriously discussed by professionals of all types wrt animal and human illnesses. (More recently theyve even been discussing the alien abduction stuff since some mutilated cows were found..) Professionals discuss far more than winds up in the mainstream narrative and Purdey *was widely respected for his efforts.
So glad you posted this . I've banged on at people for years to read up on his story. A true citizen scientist . What i recalled thinking was that soy can be very high in things like manganese and aluminium .. I think soy feed was being used with some of these animals also. Round about that time I was getting a lot of brain and nerve problems myself which I eventually traced to eating too much soy.
No mention of planet wide geoengineering within the article, even though Aluminum oxides, barium nitrates, strontium, silver iodide, and manganese are widely utilized in weather control projects. Also no mention of direct electromagnetic induction of biological cells and tissues. These electromagnetic exposures occur via phone broadcast towers and massive weather control adjuncts such as NEXRAD, HAARP, SBX radar broadcast, and the "allegedly" retired GWEN systems. The article contains numerous editing faults, yet contains valid points of reference. Thank you.
Mark Purdey was the second medical dissident I heard about after the AIDS dissidence. I must have discovered him around 2004, I think. And I immediately adopted his theories on the responsibility of phosmet and manganese in mad cow disease.
With my new theory on heavy metals, plus the one on oxidants, I understood that certain insecticides that contain both a heavy metal and an oxidant (such as oxygen, chlorine, fluorine, or even sulfur) act both via the oxidant (oxidative stress, drying) and via the heavy metal with a neurotoxic effect.
So, the element that a priori causes tremors and other neurological problems is the heavy metal.
I had nevertheless wondered if oxidants cause neurological effects. This is apparently the case, but in the relatively long term, by attacking the fatty sheath surrounding neurons. That said, perhaps for insects, the process happens much faster, given their size. But, for humans or cows, it must take time to cause neurological problems.
This article supports the idea that it's the heavy metal that's the culprit in cows. Indeed, we see that phosmet caused neurological problems. However, phosmet contains phosphorus. In contrast, ivermectin did not cause the problem. And ivermectin does not contain heavy metals. It only has an oxidizing effect (chemical formula C48H74O14), and perhaps an anticoagulant one.
Fascinating read. It’s the poison people, it’s the poisons!!
Toxicity and deficiency. Not unfindable bugs.
Good presentation, and thank You!
@drmikeyeadon .. For years I've recommended you read this chap's work on BSE .. finally someone has usefully summarised it!! Mark was a real hero and a tragic loss when he died so young.
On employer oppression. I had a dream job go sour through bullying, got IBS, the symptoms stopped on holiday, back on return. I left after.
A+ on the title
I really dig that title, "Aninal Pharm"!
So, instead of injecting toxic slurry into the cow’s, and waiting for swelling - to determine ‘mad cow disease’.!!
Why not put the wretched creatures on a ferry, and take them out to the middle of the loch; with some untried Witches, and drop them all into the murky depths.
Obvs, if they all drown; then they didn’t have the ‘disease’, and anything that survives, is so obviously a screaming pathogenic, toxic, spike protein spreading killer, that we’d have no option but to exterminate them asap. Simple. Follow the Science. Guys.
Dementia, oddly enough, is in the top five list of UK deaths per year; alongside the usual suspects: the big C, heart disease, and death by doctors (Iatrogenesis). Medical staff went on strike in the seventies, Israel was one of the places; they closed hospitals and practices. And the death rate for those months actually went down, dramatically.!!
And I remember my pet Cheetah testing positive for BSE proteins, albeit asymptomatically (he was feeling great, no symptoms, fit as a fiddle) and as long as we kept him away from the Ostriches and the local Vole population, he was sweet as a nut. Played havoc with the fallow deer population, though.
Such a shame about Mark Purdey, what a fabulously bright guy. And pretty much all over the pernicious shenanigans that the ‘authorities’ would have us believe to be the gospel truth. They absolutely hate us, with a vengeance.
I’ll be in the Carcassonne region, Jamie, for a week or so in early June. If I bump into you, I’ll deffo buy you a beer.
Good luck, fella.!!
Hey Dean.. Yes it is all so ridiculous when you lay it out in front of you. Carcassone is beautiful.. I am a little north of there. drop me a line closer to the time. J
Great reading, so tragic! Also the movie Dark Waters shows a cattle owner's cows going mad from Teflon/PFOA poisoning from dupont dumping chemicals on/near his property. That turned the light on for me, I worked in my family's ranching business during the "mad cow" madness.
Excellent Article Jamie, thanks.
I get assistance from copilot AI to make sure that I properly understand your message and the comments made by other subscribers who endeavour to clarify and enhance your message. This works for me and may be helpful to others who read this section for this purpose.
I will split the post in two and apologise in advance for length of each. Jamie I will desist from these in the future if you don't like my approach.
Post 1
Please analyse Andrews article and summarize it into 10 key points he has identified from the book, what he believes the author of the book was struggling to clarify without being able to break free from his indoctrinated position (germ theory) and all the elements that Andrews has extrapolated into his ideation, namely from the terrain perspective.
Here’s a summary of the 10 key points Jamie Andrews identifies in his article—as extracted from his analysis of the book—and how he reads the author’s struggle to break free from an entrenched, germ-theory mindset by instead hinting at a terrain-based (environmental/charge-imbalance) perspective:
1. **Entrenchment in Mainstream Science:**
Andrews observes that the book’s author, Mark Purdey, was initially a complete believer in the prevailing germ theory. This unwavering commitment meant he interpreted all phenomena—like BSE and CJD—within the confines of prion or pathogenic protein models, which limited his ability to fully question or depart from established narratives.
2. **Chemical Toxicity as the Underlying Cause:**
Purdey’s extensive field observations led him to focus on chemicals rather than infectious proteins. In particular, he noted the timeline and effects of organophosphate pesticides (e.g., Phosmet) on livestock, proposing that chemical poisoning explains the onset of neurological disease better than the accepted prion hypothesis.
3. **Contradictions in Selective Chemical Action:**
Andrews highlights a key point: if the mainstream narrative is correct about misfolded proteins or toxins selectively attacking cells, then the claimed “selectivity” is chemically and logically dubious. The idea that the same chemical can consistently target only certain species or cell types doesn’t add up—an issue Purdey’s findings expose.
4. **Metal Ion Imbalances in the Environment:**
A prominent observation in the book is that areas with clusters of neurological diseases (like CJD) show abnormal levels of metal ions in the soil—such as high levels of manganese, barium, strontium and deficiencies in copper, zinc, sulphur, and selenium. This points to an environmental factor at play, rather than simply an infectious agent.
5. **A Shift Toward a Terrain Perspective:**
Instead of viewing the body as an isolated battleground for pathogens (as germ theory would dictate), Purdey’s evidence opens up the idea that the “terrain” itself—soil chemistry, industrial pollutants, and ionic charge imbalances—could be at the heart of neurodegenerative diseases. Andrews sees this as a more holistic and perhaps accurate approach.
6. **Critique of Enzymatic Explanations:**
Andrews is critical of the enzyme-based explanations (involving “bad proteins” and selective enzyme disruptions) used in mainstream science. He suggests that many of these tests, sometimes as arbitrary as measuring reaction rates, fail to capture the real, underlying “charge” imbalances that might be causing the damage.
7. **Failure to Fully Translate Field Data:**
Despite gathering a mountain of epidemiological and experimental observations, Purdey never fully escapes the confines of his ingrained scientific framework. He often reinterprets his own radical findings in language that still aligns with traditional germ theory, thereby losing some of the transformative potential of his discoveries.
8. **Inadequacy of Standard Laboratory Tests:**
The article points out that lab tests—such as those measuring enzyme activity—are not robust enough to detect what might actually be happening: disturbances in ionic or charge balance. Andrews argues that more direct measurements (like mass spectrometry of charge) would capture what the standard tests miss.
9. **The Tragic Irony of Personal Sacrifice:**
Purdey’s life and early demise are cast as a tragedy. Andrews sees it as emblematic of how holding onto orthodox paradigms can have very real, tragic personal consequences—even for someone who gathered compelling evidence for an alternative explanation. Purdey’s struggle illustrates the cost of scientific repression and the inability to fully break from indoctrinated views.
10. **A Call to Embrace a Paradigm Shift:**
Ultimately, Andrews extrapolates that Purdey’s work—and his internal conflict between traditional germ theory and the emerging terrain perspective—should serve as a catalyst for wider rethinking. The suggestion is that understanding neurological diseases (and perhaps other conditions) might be better achieved by focusing on environmental factors and ionic imbalances rather than relying solely on pathogen-based explanations.
These points neatly capture how Andrews sees the book’s author wrestling with his legacy of mainstream scientific belief while uncovering evidence that hints at a fundamentally different, terrain-based approach to understanding disease. The tension between these worldviews forms the core of Andrews’ extrapolations and critique.
For theory of Herpes. I did some checking and found 5-HT4 seems to activate actylcholine and acetylcholine seems to activate herpes. People report getting herpes outbreak after drinking orange juice. Oranges contain hesperidin which is a 5-HT4 agonist. Additionally, people report that lysine stops herpes and arginine activates it. Lysine is 5-HT4 antagonist and arginine competes with lysine for transport into cells. Calcium ion channels also play a role. So, just off the top my head I would suspect that these biochemical pathways may be the real cause of herpes, combined with a gut microbiome causing a defect in certain hosts with host genetics that involve these biochemical pathways. Oranges are also high in arginine. I am still cautious out of respect for the unknown. The microbiome, nutritional status, host genetics and these biochemical pathways could explain the pathology. There may be host to host communication or exchange of microbiome and we should be cautious out of respect for the unknown, however all of this could be tested using the scientific method. I think the real question is, is it contagious no matter what the cause.
You could have Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) creating toxins which change gene expression of α-7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Virulence factors play a crucial role in UPEC's ability to cause disease. UPEC strains possess a plethora of both structural (as fimbriae, pili, curli, flagella) and secreted (toxins, iron-acquisition systems) virulence factors that contribute to their capacity to cause disease, although the ability to adhere to host epithelial cells in the urinary tract represents the most important determinant of pathogenicity. α-7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the trigeminal ganglia (where herpes is said to be dormant) could change gene expression. You could then try increasing Lactobacillus crispatus to crowd out the Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). People report herpes outbreak when they get stressed. When we get stress we release chatacholamines which are messenger molecules to the microbiome which increase their release of toxins or virulence factors. So, this could then change the gene expression of acetylcholine and cause an outbreak.
Interesting thanks.
I know lots more folk with brain cancers in that area since then , sadly. Nowadays it is wifi and phone masts and constant phone use etc .. but also radon in some places .. and ridiculous overhead power lines . More recently the, ahem, medications have been adding to the issue .. but also the heavy metals in our increasingly plant based diets .. Fumes from wood burners have been getting a few of us quite sickly also. A lot of factors.
Another major (claimed) finding round about that time was that the biggest correlate for mental illness in rural areas was found to be 'drinking water from a home well or other local water source. The suggestion was that biological biofilm of various types was sickening people . This could be parasites, algal toxins amongst others .. The issue of lead or copper pipes wasn't factored in at the time as I recall, tho I'd have to go back and re read. Our water supply there was full of arsenic sadly so there were a great many factors to consider !! Don't think the professionals weren't considering a wide range of factors tho, they absolutely were . The range and depth of discussion was huge. Piezoelectricity, sunspot activity .. everything short of alien abduction was being seriously discussed by professionals of all types wrt animal and human illnesses. (More recently theyve even been discussing the alien abduction stuff since some mutilated cows were found..) Professionals discuss far more than winds up in the mainstream narrative and Purdey *was widely respected for his efforts.
So glad you posted this . I've banged on at people for years to read up on his story. A true citizen scientist . What i recalled thinking was that soy can be very high in things like manganese and aluminium .. I think soy feed was being used with some of these animals also. Round about that time I was getting a lot of brain and nerve problems myself which I eventually traced to eating too much soy.
The symptoms are caused by imbalance at cellular level explained in the Redox Theory article.
No mention of planet wide geoengineering within the article, even though Aluminum oxides, barium nitrates, strontium, silver iodide, and manganese are widely utilized in weather control projects. Also no mention of direct electromagnetic induction of biological cells and tissues. These electromagnetic exposures occur via phone broadcast towers and massive weather control adjuncts such as NEXRAD, HAARP, SBX radar broadcast, and the "allegedly" retired GWEN systems. The article contains numerous editing faults, yet contains valid points of reference. Thank you.
Very interesting Jamie
Very interesting as always.
Mark Purdey was the second medical dissident I heard about after the AIDS dissidence. I must have discovered him around 2004, I think. And I immediately adopted his theories on the responsibility of phosmet and manganese in mad cow disease.
With my new theory on heavy metals, plus the one on oxidants, I understood that certain insecticides that contain both a heavy metal and an oxidant (such as oxygen, chlorine, fluorine, or even sulfur) act both via the oxidant (oxidative stress, drying) and via the heavy metal with a neurotoxic effect.
So, the element that a priori causes tremors and other neurological problems is the heavy metal.
I had nevertheless wondered if oxidants cause neurological effects. This is apparently the case, but in the relatively long term, by attacking the fatty sheath surrounding neurons. That said, perhaps for insects, the process happens much faster, given their size. But, for humans or cows, it must take time to cause neurological problems.
This article supports the idea that it's the heavy metal that's the culprit in cows. Indeed, we see that phosmet caused neurological problems. However, phosmet contains phosphorus. In contrast, ivermectin did not cause the problem. And ivermectin does not contain heavy metals. It only has an oxidizing effect (chemical formula C48H74O14), and perhaps an anticoagulant one.