I was actually in Papua New Guinea, when this study went out between 2001 and ‘04, in those particular regions of Northern Germany. And had absolutely nothing to do with the experiment; not even so much as a wet sock belonging to me was analysed.
However on my return to old Blighty, I’d received an official letter, with a Leicestershire postmark, and some oddly Germanic script stamped on the back of the envelope.
On opening this rather official looking document: I found that I was responsible for fathering fifty eight unknown (to me, at any rate) German children. And five sets of Ethiopian twins,(who weren’t in the original paternity investigations either)?
It also transpired, on further reading of the establishment missive, that: 355 males had been scheduled to take part, instead of the subsequent three hundred and forty eight; but seven of the intended participants had been murdered before the trials begun….
And owing to my DNA samples - which they admittedly didn’t have, they were charging me with the killings. And could I give myself up, and report to the nearest police station. Post haste. It’d be much appreciated.
So.. in the absence of a DNA sample (or if you ain’t got the DNA-XYZ app on your phone; or spat in bucket, recently), the Home Office will fly in Witch Doctors (public purse, obvs); and depending on the position of the Moon on any given day; they’ll employ a little bit of Voodoo…And some loose marbles - and animal bones, cast onto an old oilskin, to get the proper result.
That’s me and old Reiner in the poky now then.!!
Tried and tested. All in safe hands. Couldn’t make this up.
We can pray but I think the lies are too big for that too happen - Imagine the fallout from convicted criminals (some of whom may well have lost their lives) to families living lies - It really is quite something (yet, seemingly not so surprising in these enlightened times).
I'm simply amazed at this Jamie. It's too big to fail now, obviously. But at some day in t'future, it will come out. All those miscarriages of "justice" ... my heart goes out to those men (mostly, sadly) who had to take the consequences & live with them
The following quotes illustrate the basics of how the game is played, taking us through the (humorous) steps, from crime to conviction, in the end using the infallible magic of PCR. All of this has the same nuts and bolts as the "virus" story.
"Forensic DNA analysis starts with a biological sample, such as a hair follicle or blood stain. Scientists
break open the cells and extract the DNA for analysis (Figure 5). Luckily, forensic scientists only
need a tiny amount of DNA for analysis. For example, crimes have been solved using DNA from a
single eyelash or trace saliva on a cigarette butt. The key is a technique called polymerase chain
reaction (PCR). PCR allows scientists to make many copies of specific regions of DNA, such as
regions with a variable number of STRs."
"DNA is extracted from a biological sample. Then, PCR is used to make many copies of just the locations in the genome
with STRs that forensic scientists want to analyze. Electrophoresis techniques separate the copied STR DNA by length
and allow forensic scientists to determine the STR genotypes. If there is a DNA match, then forensic scientists perform
statistical calculations to determine the strength of the DNA evidence and the likelihood of getting a random match."
My own peculiar train of thought was sidetracked by the last paragraph in Dan Krane's article, "marginal samples likely to produce ambiguous results...older samples...exposed to environmental insult...limited samples resulting from incidental contact...".
So, in the interests of sample "purity", how is that older, marginal, environmentally insulted, and limited sample physically collected, and then transported to the comfy confines of the labrat testers? How is it protected for its journey? Is it protected like a "virus" would be? Viral transport medium (VTM) comes to mind. The BD product VTM advertises itself this way "The system features a unique blend of antimicrobics that target and suppress bacterial and fungal contamination without harming viruses....go here to see the wonders and ingredients of VTM, according to the CDC. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/Viral-Transport-Medium.pdf
"Genomes" mixing and matching all over the place, but of course those forensic scientists can ferret out the truth.
I woke up thinking about your article and this film, which of course impressed me at the time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzG3I7nMEks 'Gattaca' from 1997, back before the old world changed into the "new" one . Just how much misinfo is around us, really? Tx again Jamie
I was actually in Papua New Guinea, when this study went out between 2001 and ‘04, in those particular regions of Northern Germany. And had absolutely nothing to do with the experiment; not even so much as a wet sock belonging to me was analysed.
However on my return to old Blighty, I’d received an official letter, with a Leicestershire postmark, and some oddly Germanic script stamped on the back of the envelope.
On opening this rather official looking document: I found that I was responsible for fathering fifty eight unknown (to me, at any rate) German children. And five sets of Ethiopian twins,(who weren’t in the original paternity investigations either)?
It also transpired, on further reading of the establishment missive, that: 355 males had been scheduled to take part, instead of the subsequent three hundred and forty eight; but seven of the intended participants had been murdered before the trials begun….
And owing to my DNA samples - which they admittedly didn’t have, they were charging me with the killings. And could I give myself up, and report to the nearest police station. Post haste. It’d be much appreciated.
So.. in the absence of a DNA sample (or if you ain’t got the DNA-XYZ app on your phone; or spat in bucket, recently), the Home Office will fly in Witch Doctors (public purse, obvs); and depending on the position of the Moon on any given day; they’ll employ a little bit of Voodoo…And some loose marbles - and animal bones, cast onto an old oilskin, to get the proper result.
That’s me and old Reiner in the poky now then.!!
Tried and tested. All in safe hands. Couldn’t make this up.
FFS. Guys. Follow. The. Science.
What can we trust? Apparently nothing much in the field of science. Is the entire medical mafia a total fake out?
More amazing work Jamie.
The consequences of such pseudoscience is truly jaw dropping.
Amazing that such shoddy work is embraced as the pinnacle! May We see a return to truth, logic, reason, and honesty!
We can pray but I think the lies are too big for that too happen - Imagine the fallout from convicted criminals (some of whom may well have lost their lives) to families living lies - It really is quite something (yet, seemingly not so surprising in these enlightened times).
And I think it is driven by money, and that obsoleting that tool will make a vast difference.
Why Money is Not in Your Best Interest (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/why-money-is-not-in-your-best-interest
Obsoleting Money (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/obsoleting-money
This is huge Jamie.
It's apparent that we cannot trust any science with respect to Medical.
I was going to ask you about this topic and puff, it's there.
Great work Jamie and as DPL would say, "You're an FN champ"
I'm simply amazed at this Jamie. It's too big to fail now, obviously. But at some day in t'future, it will come out. All those miscarriages of "justice" ... my heart goes out to those men (mostly, sadly) who had to take the consequences & live with them
The following quotes illustrate the basics of how the game is played, taking us through the (humorous) steps, from crime to conviction, in the end using the infallible magic of PCR. All of this has the same nuts and bolts as the "virus" story.
https://www.minipcr.com/wp-content/uploads/miniPCR-electrophoresis-forensics-lab_student-guide-FINAL.pdf
"Forensic DNA analysis starts with a biological sample, such as a hair follicle or blood stain. Scientists
break open the cells and extract the DNA for analysis (Figure 5). Luckily, forensic scientists only
need a tiny amount of DNA for analysis. For example, crimes have been solved using DNA from a
single eyelash or trace saliva on a cigarette butt. The key is a technique called polymerase chain
reaction (PCR). PCR allows scientists to make many copies of specific regions of DNA, such as
regions with a variable number of STRs."
"DNA is extracted from a biological sample. Then, PCR is used to make many copies of just the locations in the genome
with STRs that forensic scientists want to analyze. Electrophoresis techniques separate the copied STR DNA by length
and allow forensic scientists to determine the STR genotypes. If there is a DNA match, then forensic scientists perform
statistical calculations to determine the strength of the DNA evidence and the likelihood of getting a random match."
My own peculiar train of thought was sidetracked by the last paragraph in Dan Krane's article, "marginal samples likely to produce ambiguous results...older samples...exposed to environmental insult...limited samples resulting from incidental contact...".
So, in the interests of sample "purity", how is that older, marginal, environmentally insulted, and limited sample physically collected, and then transported to the comfy confines of the labrat testers? How is it protected for its journey? Is it protected like a "virus" would be? Viral transport medium (VTM) comes to mind. The BD product VTM advertises itself this way "The system features a unique blend of antimicrobics that target and suppress bacterial and fungal contamination without harming viruses....go here to see the wonders and ingredients of VTM, according to the CDC. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/Viral-Transport-Medium.pdf
"Genomes" mixing and matching all over the place, but of course those forensic scientists can ferret out the truth.
And then I jizzed in my pants. Another day, another terrible lie uncovered to get me going.
Subscribed 👍
I woke up thinking about your article and this film, which of course impressed me at the time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzG3I7nMEks 'Gattaca' from 1997, back before the old world changed into the "new" one . Just how much misinfo is around us, really? Tx again Jamie