As I venture deeper into the realms of chemistry, I felt the need to reacquaint myself with an overarching theory developed by the titan of the “No Virus” movement, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos.
I like your approach to simplify things because like you, I see that a lot of biology is over complicated and in many cases deluded.
When it comes to aluminum, I've heard tons of explanations that are a bit over complicated. It's easier to look at it in a purely chemical way, not needing complex biology.
Aluminum replaces other metals that work as catalysts. But aluminum is not as good of a catalyst, so it slows down metabolism leading to dysfunction.
When I get time I will do a post on elemental chemistry as I think that may be simplified and reduced further.. like are there really all of these distinct "elements" when 90% of them are not found in nature in their pure form.
It's hilarious that a lot of the heavier elements in the periodic table were found by bombarding atoms and they are short lived. If they are short lived are they real at all?
Heinz von Foerester -what is reality?
He explains how physics made up particles to fulfill formulas. Science became imaginary, especially quantum physics.
i haven't watched that video, but what you describe sounds similar to a book published last year by Steven A Young: A Fools Wisdom - Science Conspiracies and The Secret Art of Alchemy
I also came up with this idea a few months ago. But I've extended it to all heavy metals.
In my opinion, all metals denser than what I call the body's essential metals (sodium, potassium, calcium, maybe magnesium), replace these metals, thus causing the same symptoms as hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia.
As a result, the flow of electricity through the body is reduced, leading to cognitive, neurological and muscular problems, etc...
And if I'm right, it would greatly simplify the toxicological analysis of heavy metals. Because right now, when we do research on the subject, we find that very few studies have been carried out. And it's easy to see why the big metal companies and many others that use heavy metals don't want us to understand how they work. That would enable a lot of people to sue them for poisoning. As long as scientists can only establish vague correlations, these companies are protected because they can produce studies saying the opposite. From now on, things will be very different.
However, there are some heavy metals like arsenic, which seem to have different effects. So there must be a few exceptions. But overall, it seems that most heavy metals have the same effects.
Funnily enough from around 1860 to 1980 much of the world spewed Paris Green, lead arsenate, and other arsenical pesticides all over their food, their tobacco, their livestock, etc. which has resulted - to this day - in soil and well water / aquifer contamination. Arsenic (and other heavy metal) poisoning is interesting as - to my untrained eye - can cause symptoms clinically identical to so-called "contagious diseases" from "germs" that were "discovered" in the 1860s.
interesting. would that also mean then that the charge is interupted/distorted? I'm a nitwit in science, please be patient with my little rambling here, but it could possibly support your idea.
When I read that about DMSO of course I thought about all the health controversy around it and how some folks really do insist it helps them. Why might this be, I was wondering? And then I remembered the very common country cure for dogs when they get hit by a car, even in the case they seem incurable, spine broken or something, can't walk, won't/can't get up. I have heard many folks absolutely insist this works and is a miracle: to rub gasoline along its back, which cures the paralysis.
Might this be working because it somehow 'snaps' back into a natural order, or some such?
Check out leonard neatu. He wants to remove toxins. As far as I understand it, it is like dialysis, the procedure that patients with kidney disease use to filter their blood, except with a different filter.
I haven't done much research in that area. But, I think a solution would be to slightly increase the ration of sodium, potassium and calcium, while obviously stopping the poisoning. After a while, the essential metals should take their place again.
Perhaps drinking water that's low in minerals can help. After all, it works well for essential metals. If you drink too much of this kind of water during exercise, you can end up with a mineral deficiency and cramps. So why not for heavy metals? And you can speed up the cell filling/emptying cycle with sugary drinks, which will flush out the heavy metals. It would be like a purge. But in that case, you'd also need to supplement with essential metals, to avoid becoming deficient in them. All the same, I think the first solution is more prudent.
But there may be other solutions.
That said, if the body is completely soaked in heavy metals, it's probably much harder to get rid of them. But we must do trials.
I think sodium is particularly important. I had problems finding my words several years ago (I think, due to an excess of fruit and fruit juices, which drained my body of its mineral salts). And by taking a little more salt, the problem disappeared.
By the way, I think that tetanus and rabies were in fact problems caused by a lack of mineral salts, especially sodium. Nothing to do with microbes. And the use of lithium to treat epilepsy is a scam. When symptoms improve with lithium, sodium (and perhaps potassium and calcium, too, it remains to be seen) should actually be used.
The problem is that I have new ideas all the time. And I publish them on my blog in French. Publishing in English on Substack would take me time. But I'll try.
Indeed , while emergency medicine can save your life in an accident. Most other medical areas are lackluster at best and dangerous/life threatening at worst
REmarkable stuff. I spent 40 minutes reading this...understood maybe 65%...pretty good for me. I can't devote the time to properly read, study and understand everything, but thank you. What you're explaining congrues with the observations of others that life is electromagnetic and that disturbances to proper subtle electro current and pulsation (i'm making terms up) such as wifi, or heavy metals, disrupt and damage. So down with virus fantasies, up with grounding. It's good to read your stuff, because I look up about 10 words each time. Word of the Day: Obtuse. Now I can more effectively insult people who disagree with me.
Somebody should graph incidence of diseases in a population against the implementation of cell towers around the same population 👀
Hell they even theorized Spanish flu back in the day was caused by launching of the massive AM radio towers when they first proliferated around the world
I mean also, it mostly affected young men who at the time had been or were fighting in a big war that used chemical weapons.
According to US vital statistics, virtually nobody over 40-50 was affected at all (in terms of overall mortality). So it was something directed at the young, mostly young men.
Love this part: "Just like a plant bending toward the light I feel that this is exactly the same, rather than a Macrophage searching out the toxins and discerning what to gobble up it is being attracted through charge gradients and almost being pulled toward the toxins that it integrates."
He is speaking in cyphered language. He told me he hates to say that he "does not know enough about nanotech and graphene" to speak about it, while sharing a whirlpool with COINTEL head malone - BUT he is not a bad human being, ala Aldous Huxley, he is using his intelligence to warn us, while still speaking about spike proteins (which are protein coronas around nanoparticles- https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/the-necro-corona-of-molecular-spikes) - he is giving really good information out here, regarding the CHARGE as the basis for EVERYTHING in a holistic health system of the future that he portrays here, elaborating on the zeta potential for the colloidal suspension of the elements in blood (which is extremely altered towards the unhealthy "+" side in most of humanity rn ...).
Fascinating insights, very interesting indeed. Essentially, there is so little that is really understood about cell biology and a great body of misunderstanding has grown up over decades and supports a massive industry which does nothing good for people’s well being.
Great article Jamie. Have you ever considered how light and circadian rhythm interacts with electrical charge in the body? The mitochondrial theory of aging and diseases essentially attributes all dis-ease with mitochondrial dysfunction, which in turn is largely driven by artificial light, nnEMF’s, poor circadian rhythm, etc. What this does is disrupt the “redox” reactions at the mitochondrial level which drives oxidation, the internal production of free radicals and impaired antioxidant production.
Thanks Brett! I haven't looked directly much further than this (definitely will do for future articles). To my mind there MUST be something correlating say seasonal changes to how the body works or what triggers Flora and Fauna to say leaf drop or Drop/Gain fur. My gut instincts tell me this is all curated through these charge interactions... but more investigations needed...
I think that would have to be the sun. Affecting everything from the weather , electromagnetic potential of the atmosphere , temperatures and heat.
Probably the rate of vitamin d synthesis controls a whole host of differing cascading effects within the bodies.
Like all those indoor plants that require temperature control and modulation aswell as different light spectrum bulbs changed to simulate seasonal changes indoors . Regardless of actual season outdoors 😉
I too thought 20 years ago that what was going on at cellular level and at the level of blood particles must come under electromagnetic problems. But, as I was busy questioning medicine disease by disease, I didn't dig any deeper than that. So thank you very much for this work.
The idea that cells have a contractile membrane is very interesting. I've built up a theory based on the cortisol/opiates, stimulant/sedative couple. As I see it, this controls the cycles of waking/sleeping, cell filling/cell emptying, etc...
It's available here (usually in the category "problématique du cortisol):
I think cortisol allows cells to fill with water. I was going for a chemical phenomenon causing cells to swell (and fill up with water). But it didn't seem completely conclusive. So, for some time now, I've been more interested in the idea that cortisol plays a role in the muscular contraction of blood vessels and that blood overpressure draws water into tissues, then cells.
But, if cells have a contractile membrane, this brings back the idea that, individually, cells can fill up or empty out; this, under the influence of cortisol or opiates.
Thank you. 👍👍👍 So, when they do experiments, they usually break down a cell or some networked parts into fragments. Then they brand those fragments as unique or building blocks. But there are a lot of versions, transition states, background noise. You have to fabricate a story. But this is clear that they are detecting something positive or negative, larger or smaller. Everything else is problematic.
Jamie, my friend, Ionic Charges replace “Recognizing”, “Proteins” are charges and the bottom line is similar to a computer code of Zero and One’s…is pure science at its finest! Bravo! (I wish you had met Dr. Boris Levinsky of the Irkutsk Institute Mines and Minerals!!) I carried over his charges and molecular dissociations into my Natural Medicines practice and lectures.
Although Barry Sears, creator of the Zone Diet, placed too much emphasis on supplements, such as fish oil (ugh), he did focus on internal inflammation, or oxidative stress, as a driver of disease. I think he was right about that.
What is consciousness? It's just whatever the thing is that drives charge gradients.
As I didn’t have a single Chemistry lesson when at school I have always struggled.
O’ level Biology and Physics in 1964 don’t quite cut it 😂🤣.
I will reread this in more depth and look forward to any simplified Chemistry basics as I really want to learn more.As admin for Dr Mike I try to answer all members questions and that often means a steep learning curve before replying.
I am particularly interested in “Charge” I listened to Dr Tom about the heart not being a pump,this led me to, Francisco(Paco) Torrent - Guesp ,vortexing blood and pulse oximetry.I thought it measured the red blood cells ,but No, it registers charge.
I do disagree with one comment, about DMSO, I use it many times and it is now my go to product for pain and inflammation reduction,it is like a miracle to me.
Hi Jamie, thank you for the redux way of viewing what are otherwise "complicated" subjects!
In my extremely limited understanding, i'd like your opinion on something.....
It's said that appart from the psychological theories of aging, all the others are mechanistic/materialistic in nature, and not much progress has been made in the last 30 years or so about this topic. Do you think that, if viewed by the lenses of charge, not "DNA", new ways of thinking about it could become feasable?? Many thanks in advance :)
Thanks Jamie. Starting with gradients, or inside and outside or even some form of gradual decrease/increase in concentration over a distance we are discussing membranes whether they be hydrophobic and hydrophilic or merely reduced mixing such as in 4th phase water (h302 with charge separation), it is important not to neglect dissolved gases. Oil and water behave differently in a vacuum.
It is interesting to change the charge in a cell and note the outcome but life is not like this one off event, in university, we took a beating heart from a frog and strung it up and kept it beating and then experimented with chemicals and noted the outcomes, when we introduced potassium we saw an irreversible reaction, other molecules could change the intensity or frequency of the beats as did potassium but we could reverse them, not so with potassium. life is a balance where the system can be recharged and the experiment repeated, so what are the limits of this see saw or balance? Charge implies a difference or 2 poles, which we call the oxidant and the reductant. The ultimate poles that can be reused in our system are h2 and o2. H2 and o2 can mix without any reaction, even though it is enthalpically favourable, the pi orbital electron in the oxygen double bond needs to first be energized before it will drop back to a lower level. So you should not discuss all biological reactions without at least a paying attention to emfs. You mentioned szent gyorgyi who really encapsulated the concept well. A more modern scientist with a focus on redox is Dr Leonard Neatu. His work is on removing toxins from biological systems and more importantly, testing the redox status of a person. This involves 2 measures, the oxidant state and reductant state, and the reservoir of reductants (antioxidants) that will be available if oxidation requires it. We do not run on this ideal o2 and h2 instead the o2 is catalysed by minerals and chelators and hence has slightly less power and the hydrogen is usually considered to be bound to carbon and once again does not hold the full potential of h2, so the bandwidth or total difference is less than ideal but also the emf required to initiate the reaction is also different. You have mentioned sulfur which is critical in determining the redox status of a given volume and also considered the ultimate antioxidant, but I think dismissing phosphate (atp) was an error. If the oxidation state of oxygen is reduced from 0 to 2- there is a concomitant release of emf, because we no longer have lone pi orbitals but instead move to sp3 hybridisation and phosphate with it's inherent phospholuminescence is a useful carrier of this energy to where it can initiate the next reaction upon release. So when the 3rd phosphate is added to ADP emfs(light) is also encapsulated.
I suggest a similar reductionist approach but recommend incorporating other concepts in aqueous solutions such as redox, ph, isotonicity, chelation, catalysts, emfs, dissolved gases, temperature, phase changes, dielectric strength, magnetic moment and any others you can think of. While you are at it, we can follow the rabbit whole down to the next level and look at the proton and neutron themselves, in relation to Schrodinger's hydrogen wave function and eventually the perturbations of aether with it's possible standing waveforms over the cycle between induction to/from magnetism and dielectricity.
To me, the simplest reductionist approach is to focus on chronic inflammation, which is obviously associated with redox, temp, ph, emfs etc. next is to define our key states of recharging these reactions. These are to produce CO2 (oxidative phosphorylation) or lactate (Warburg effect), CO2 can be breathed off, lactate can be reused by converting it back to pyruvate. This brings another concept of dielectric strength of water and the impact of deuterium. Dueterium is said to slow complex 5 in the electron transport chain (atp synthase) which leads to a changed redox state and then lactate production and less CO2 production. Really pretty simply, lactate vs CO2. Over production of lactate leads to chronic inflammation and is associated with oxidative stress (inefficient utilisation of oxygen).
Regarding ionic concentration, my research on the use of oxygen during COVID-19 led me to study the problem of oxygen in scuba diving. This led me to also study the effect of nitrogen in scuba diving.
And I came across something very curious. Beyond a certain depth, oxygen-nitrogen mixtures pose a problem because we start to experience an opiate effect due to the nitrogen.
So, they use other mixtures, such as oxygen-helium. This allows to dive to even greater depths. However, this mixture also ends up producing opiate effects beyond a certain depth.
So, even with a different gas, we end up having the same effects as nitrogen. And we might wonder if the problem doesn't stem from the fact that pressure increases the concentration of helium and therefore ends up giving it an effect identical to nitrogen. The ionic action of helium on the body would be the same as that of nitrogen, but this would only be seen at high concentrations.
I like your approach to simplify things because like you, I see that a lot of biology is over complicated and in many cases deluded.
When it comes to aluminum, I've heard tons of explanations that are a bit over complicated. It's easier to look at it in a purely chemical way, not needing complex biology.
Aluminum replaces other metals that work as catalysts. But aluminum is not as good of a catalyst, so it slows down metabolism leading to dysfunction.
When I get time I will do a post on elemental chemistry as I think that may be simplified and reduced further.. like are there really all of these distinct "elements" when 90% of them are not found in nature in their pure form.
It's hilarious that a lot of the heavier elements in the periodic table were found by bombarding atoms and they are short lived. If they are short lived are they real at all?
Heinz von Foerester -what is reality?
He explains how physics made up particles to fulfill formulas. Science became imaginary, especially quantum physics.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ev7e9sfWIJo
i haven't watched that video, but what you describe sounds similar to a book published last year by Steven A Young: A Fools Wisdom - Science Conspiracies and The Secret Art of Alchemy
I also came up with this idea a few months ago. But I've extended it to all heavy metals.
In my opinion, all metals denser than what I call the body's essential metals (sodium, potassium, calcium, maybe magnesium), replace these metals, thus causing the same symptoms as hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia.
As a result, the flow of electricity through the body is reduced, leading to cognitive, neurological and muscular problems, etc...
That is an interesting theory and my gut reaction is to think you might be onto something there.
Thank you,
And if I'm right, it would greatly simplify the toxicological analysis of heavy metals. Because right now, when we do research on the subject, we find that very few studies have been carried out. And it's easy to see why the big metal companies and many others that use heavy metals don't want us to understand how they work. That would enable a lot of people to sue them for poisoning. As long as scientists can only establish vague correlations, these companies are protected because they can produce studies saying the opposite. From now on, things will be very different.
However, there are some heavy metals like arsenic, which seem to have different effects. So there must be a few exceptions. But overall, it seems that most heavy metals have the same effects.
Funnily enough from around 1860 to 1980 much of the world spewed Paris Green, lead arsenate, and other arsenical pesticides all over their food, their tobacco, their livestock, etc. which has resulted - to this day - in soil and well water / aquifer contamination. Arsenic (and other heavy metal) poisoning is interesting as - to my untrained eye - can cause symptoms clinically identical to so-called "contagious diseases" from "germs" that were "discovered" in the 1860s.
Correct
interesting. would that also mean then that the charge is interupted/distorted? I'm a nitwit in science, please be patient with my little rambling here, but it could possibly support your idea.
When I read that about DMSO of course I thought about all the health controversy around it and how some folks really do insist it helps them. Why might this be, I was wondering? And then I remembered the very common country cure for dogs when they get hit by a car, even in the case they seem incurable, spine broken or something, can't walk, won't/can't get up. I have heard many folks absolutely insist this works and is a miracle: to rub gasoline along its back, which cures the paralysis.
Might this be working because it somehow 'snaps' back into a natural order, or some such?
Interesting!
But do you think it’s more the mere presence of these metals that is the problem?
Or a failure of the body’s innate detox system failing to escort them out?
Check out leonard neatu. He wants to remove toxins. As far as I understand it, it is like dialysis, the procedure that patients with kidney disease use to filter their blood, except with a different filter.
I haven't done much research in that area. But, I think a solution would be to slightly increase the ration of sodium, potassium and calcium, while obviously stopping the poisoning. After a while, the essential metals should take their place again.
Perhaps drinking water that's low in minerals can help. After all, it works well for essential metals. If you drink too much of this kind of water during exercise, you can end up with a mineral deficiency and cramps. So why not for heavy metals? And you can speed up the cell filling/emptying cycle with sugary drinks, which will flush out the heavy metals. It would be like a purge. But in that case, you'd also need to supplement with essential metals, to avoid becoming deficient in them. All the same, I think the first solution is more prudent.
But there may be other solutions.
That said, if the body is completely soaked in heavy metals, it's probably much harder to get rid of them. But we must do trials.
I think sodium is particularly important. I had problems finding my words several years ago (I think, due to an excess of fruit and fruit juices, which drained my body of its mineral salts). And by taking a little more salt, the problem disappeared.
By the way, I think that tetanus and rabies were in fact problems caused by a lack of mineral salts, especially sodium. Nothing to do with microbes. And the use of lithium to treat epilepsy is a scam. When symptoms improve with lithium, sodium (and perhaps potassium and calcium, too, it remains to be seen) should actually be used.
please start writing up your ideas, on your own substack
The problem is that I have new ideas all the time. And I publish them on my blog in French. Publishing in English on Substack would take me time. But I'll try.
use AI to translate from french to english.
English has a much wider reach
https://www.activistpost.com/node-without-consent/
I can be even more reductionist and simplistic. Most science - and particularly medical science - is made up bullshit and generally wrong.
Indeed , while emergency medicine can save your life in an accident. Most other medical areas are lackluster at best and dangerous/life threatening at worst
REmarkable stuff. I spent 40 minutes reading this...understood maybe 65%...pretty good for me. I can't devote the time to properly read, study and understand everything, but thank you. What you're explaining congrues with the observations of others that life is electromagnetic and that disturbances to proper subtle electro current and pulsation (i'm making terms up) such as wifi, or heavy metals, disrupt and damage. So down with virus fantasies, up with grounding. It's good to read your stuff, because I look up about 10 words each time. Word of the Day: Obtuse. Now I can more effectively insult people who disagree with me.
Lol... obtuse is a good one definitely..
Somebody should graph incidence of diseases in a population against the implementation of cell towers around the same population 👀
Hell they even theorized Spanish flu back in the day was caused by launching of the massive AM radio towers when they first proliferated around the world
Book The Invisible Rainbow documents the phenomena you're referencing in detail and length.
Thanks!
I’ll check it out 📔
I mean also, it mostly affected young men who at the time had been or were fighting in a big war that used chemical weapons.
According to US vital statistics, virtually nobody over 40-50 was affected at all (in terms of overall mortality). So it was something directed at the young, mostly young men.
Love this part: "Just like a plant bending toward the light I feel that this is exactly the same, rather than a Macrophage searching out the toxins and discerning what to gobble up it is being attracted through charge gradients and almost being pulled toward the toxins that it integrates."
It reminds me of the Dr.Monica Gaglianos work on plants. So fascinating.
I bet you will appreciate this mans work: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-all-vaccines-so-dangerous
He is speaking in cyphered language. He told me he hates to say that he "does not know enough about nanotech and graphene" to speak about it, while sharing a whirlpool with COINTEL head malone - BUT he is not a bad human being, ala Aldous Huxley, he is using his intelligence to warn us, while still speaking about spike proteins (which are protein coronas around nanoparticles- https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/the-necro-corona-of-molecular-spikes) - he is giving really good information out here, regarding the CHARGE as the basis for EVERYTHING in a holistic health system of the future that he portrays here, elaborating on the zeta potential for the colloidal suspension of the elements in blood (which is extremely altered towards the unhealthy "+" side in most of humanity rn ...).
Fascinating insights, very interesting indeed. Essentially, there is so little that is really understood about cell biology and a great body of misunderstanding has grown up over decades and supports a massive industry which does nothing good for people’s well being.
Great article Jamie. Have you ever considered how light and circadian rhythm interacts with electrical charge in the body? The mitochondrial theory of aging and diseases essentially attributes all dis-ease with mitochondrial dysfunction, which in turn is largely driven by artificial light, nnEMF’s, poor circadian rhythm, etc. What this does is disrupt the “redox” reactions at the mitochondrial level which drives oxidation, the internal production of free radicals and impaired antioxidant production.
Thanks Brett! I haven't looked directly much further than this (definitely will do for future articles). To my mind there MUST be something correlating say seasonal changes to how the body works or what triggers Flora and Fauna to say leaf drop or Drop/Gain fur. My gut instincts tell me this is all curated through these charge interactions... but more investigations needed...
I think that would have to be the sun. Affecting everything from the weather , electromagnetic potential of the atmosphere , temperatures and heat.
Probably the rate of vitamin d synthesis controls a whole host of differing cascading effects within the bodies.
Like all those indoor plants that require temperature control and modulation aswell as different light spectrum bulbs changed to simulate seasonal changes indoors . Regardless of actual season outdoors 😉
Fantastic once again.
I too thought 20 years ago that what was going on at cellular level and at the level of blood particles must come under electromagnetic problems. But, as I was busy questioning medicine disease by disease, I didn't dig any deeper than that. So thank you very much for this work.
The idea that cells have a contractile membrane is very interesting. I've built up a theory based on the cortisol/opiates, stimulant/sedative couple. As I see it, this controls the cycles of waking/sleeping, cell filling/cell emptying, etc...
It's available here (usually in the category "problématique du cortisol):
https://www.repenser-la-medecine.com/quotidien/
I think cortisol allows cells to fill with water. I was going for a chemical phenomenon causing cells to swell (and fill up with water). But it didn't seem completely conclusive. So, for some time now, I've been more interested in the idea that cortisol plays a role in the muscular contraction of blood vessels and that blood overpressure draws water into tissues, then cells.
But, if cells have a contractile membrane, this brings back the idea that, individually, cells can fill up or empty out; this, under the influence of cortisol or opiates.
Jamie, you need to look at the work of Dr Jack Kruse.
Specifically the Rick Rubin podcast with Kruse schooling Huberman on this exact topic for 6.5 hours. The piece you are missing is light.
Thank you. 👍👍👍 So, when they do experiments, they usually break down a cell or some networked parts into fragments. Then they brand those fragments as unique or building blocks. But there are a lot of versions, transition states, background noise. You have to fabricate a story. But this is clear that they are detecting something positive or negative, larger or smaller. Everything else is problematic.
Jamie, my friend, Ionic Charges replace “Recognizing”, “Proteins” are charges and the bottom line is similar to a computer code of Zero and One’s…is pure science at its finest! Bravo! (I wish you had met Dr. Boris Levinsky of the Irkutsk Institute Mines and Minerals!!) I carried over his charges and molecular dissociations into my Natural Medicines practice and lectures.
Although Barry Sears, creator of the Zone Diet, placed too much emphasis on supplements, such as fish oil (ugh), he did focus on internal inflammation, or oxidative stress, as a driver of disease. I think he was right about that.
What is consciousness? It's just whatever the thing is that drives charge gradients.
Hi Jamie ,
Thank you for this fascinating article.🙏
As I didn’t have a single Chemistry lesson when at school I have always struggled.
O’ level Biology and Physics in 1964 don’t quite cut it 😂🤣.
I will reread this in more depth and look forward to any simplified Chemistry basics as I really want to learn more.As admin for Dr Mike I try to answer all members questions and that often means a steep learning curve before replying.
I am particularly interested in “Charge” I listened to Dr Tom about the heart not being a pump,this led me to, Francisco(Paco) Torrent - Guesp ,vortexing blood and pulse oximetry.I thought it measured the red blood cells ,but No, it registers charge.
I do disagree with one comment, about DMSO, I use it many times and it is now my go to product for pain and inflammation reduction,it is like a miracle to me.
Best Wishes Helen 😊
Hi Jamie, thank you for the redux way of viewing what are otherwise "complicated" subjects!
In my extremely limited understanding, i'd like your opinion on something.....
It's said that appart from the psychological theories of aging, all the others are mechanistic/materialistic in nature, and not much progress has been made in the last 30 years or so about this topic. Do you think that, if viewed by the lenses of charge, not "DNA", new ways of thinking about it could become feasable?? Many thanks in advance :)
I have to answer in an open ended way because I don't know: No change is possible until you know the true mechanisms of life so...
Thanks Jamie. Starting with gradients, or inside and outside or even some form of gradual decrease/increase in concentration over a distance we are discussing membranes whether they be hydrophobic and hydrophilic or merely reduced mixing such as in 4th phase water (h302 with charge separation), it is important not to neglect dissolved gases. Oil and water behave differently in a vacuum.
It is interesting to change the charge in a cell and note the outcome but life is not like this one off event, in university, we took a beating heart from a frog and strung it up and kept it beating and then experimented with chemicals and noted the outcomes, when we introduced potassium we saw an irreversible reaction, other molecules could change the intensity or frequency of the beats as did potassium but we could reverse them, not so with potassium. life is a balance where the system can be recharged and the experiment repeated, so what are the limits of this see saw or balance? Charge implies a difference or 2 poles, which we call the oxidant and the reductant. The ultimate poles that can be reused in our system are h2 and o2. H2 and o2 can mix without any reaction, even though it is enthalpically favourable, the pi orbital electron in the oxygen double bond needs to first be energized before it will drop back to a lower level. So you should not discuss all biological reactions without at least a paying attention to emfs. You mentioned szent gyorgyi who really encapsulated the concept well. A more modern scientist with a focus on redox is Dr Leonard Neatu. His work is on removing toxins from biological systems and more importantly, testing the redox status of a person. This involves 2 measures, the oxidant state and reductant state, and the reservoir of reductants (antioxidants) that will be available if oxidation requires it. We do not run on this ideal o2 and h2 instead the o2 is catalysed by minerals and chelators and hence has slightly less power and the hydrogen is usually considered to be bound to carbon and once again does not hold the full potential of h2, so the bandwidth or total difference is less than ideal but also the emf required to initiate the reaction is also different. You have mentioned sulfur which is critical in determining the redox status of a given volume and also considered the ultimate antioxidant, but I think dismissing phosphate (atp) was an error. If the oxidation state of oxygen is reduced from 0 to 2- there is a concomitant release of emf, because we no longer have lone pi orbitals but instead move to sp3 hybridisation and phosphate with it's inherent phospholuminescence is a useful carrier of this energy to where it can initiate the next reaction upon release. So when the 3rd phosphate is added to ADP emfs(light) is also encapsulated.
I suggest a similar reductionist approach but recommend incorporating other concepts in aqueous solutions such as redox, ph, isotonicity, chelation, catalysts, emfs, dissolved gases, temperature, phase changes, dielectric strength, magnetic moment and any others you can think of. While you are at it, we can follow the rabbit whole down to the next level and look at the proton and neutron themselves, in relation to Schrodinger's hydrogen wave function and eventually the perturbations of aether with it's possible standing waveforms over the cycle between induction to/from magnetism and dielectricity.
To me, the simplest reductionist approach is to focus on chronic inflammation, which is obviously associated with redox, temp, ph, emfs etc. next is to define our key states of recharging these reactions. These are to produce CO2 (oxidative phosphorylation) or lactate (Warburg effect), CO2 can be breathed off, lactate can be reused by converting it back to pyruvate. This brings another concept of dielectric strength of water and the impact of deuterium. Dueterium is said to slow complex 5 in the electron transport chain (atp synthase) which leads to a changed redox state and then lactate production and less CO2 production. Really pretty simply, lactate vs CO2. Over production of lactate leads to chronic inflammation and is associated with oxidative stress (inefficient utilisation of oxygen).
Regarding ionic concentration, my research on the use of oxygen during COVID-19 led me to study the problem of oxygen in scuba diving. This led me to also study the effect of nitrogen in scuba diving.
And I came across something very curious. Beyond a certain depth, oxygen-nitrogen mixtures pose a problem because we start to experience an opiate effect due to the nitrogen.
So, they use other mixtures, such as oxygen-helium. This allows to dive to even greater depths. However, this mixture also ends up producing opiate effects beyond a certain depth.
So, even with a different gas, we end up having the same effects as nitrogen. And we might wonder if the problem doesn't stem from the fact that pressure increases the concentration of helium and therefore ends up giving it an effect identical to nitrogen. The ionic action of helium on the body would be the same as that of nitrogen, but this would only be seen at high concentrations.