"[I]f LLMs can be poisoned, 'this is something that’s concerning for us.'"
Well, of course they can be poisoned. Of course they can be gamed. They're *supposed* to be. That's the entire point of them. OpenAI admitted last year that even with perfect data, LLMs will always lie and hallucinate "due to fundamental statistical and computational limits" and "fundamental mathematical constraints." Allowing that shit anywhere near any human endeavor that relies on knowledge and history--notably law and medicine--is suicide and should be criminalized.
Besides AI's applications to the surveillance state, the deliberate corruption of objectivity is its only other reason for existing. It's there to destroy people's ability to tell real from fake. That contributes to learned helplessness and that's good for psychopaths who need mental passivity and indifference in the people they want to rule.
"If a blind person leads a blind person, both of them will fall into a hole." Gospel of Saint Thomas, verse 34. Just something a wise guy said couple centuries ago.
"I sell no bullshit supplements, no crappy merchandise, no whacko gadgets, I have no sponsors, no advertising and everything is possible to read for free." Why I love you... ♥
I thought this was outrageous when I saw it too. So they are just in your face admitting it now.
BTW, I put the same article in a note a few days ago. I got one response from someone calling themselves "the last scientist". They proceeded to call me a fucking moron.
i feel like this about "pots." came out of nowhere and was the trendy condition to have, in fact my 13 yr old niece got diagnosed with it 🤦🏻♀️ my sister said, "well she hs the classic case of pots..." so now at 14 she is on meds already. oh dont bother changing her diet or implementing some movement or some herbs or help her cope with her trauma that she had as an infant that i see playing arole in her life now.....oye.
The idea that A/i will be smarter than man is ridiculous. It may be able to collect data and present it an a more orderly manner. It may be able to write fake songs for U-Tube and it may be able to replace some jobs that are nothing more than paper shuffling...so what? For A/i to work, it has to be coded flawlessly.
It's initial data feed has to be totally truthful. When was the last time computer software didn't need constant updating? Never. GIGO (garbage in-garbage out) still applies to the silly A/i retards.
But I think Jamie used it to re-plumb his house, so there is that.
Jamie — this is exactly the kind of work that needs to be done, and more importantly, *done properly*.
What you’re surfacing here isn’t just “alternative thinking” — it’s identification of **compressed assumptions** that most people never stop to examine. That’s where the real value is.
If you run this through a structured lens like PIE (Precision, Internal Coherence, External Consistency, Constraint Awareness) combined with Boundary Control, something interesting happens:
* A lot of what you’re pointing at moves out of the “dismissible narrative” category
* And into **legitimate evidential gaps, unresolved mechanisms, and pattern-level signals that warrant investigation**
That’s a very different position.
Because the real issue isn’t whether every conclusion is already proven — it’s whether the **official explanations are relying on assumed bridges that haven’t actually been evidenced**.
And in multiple domains (legal, medical, institutional), we keep seeing the same pattern:
* strong surface-level certainty
* but weak or opaque underlying mechanisms
* and heavy reliance on proxy measures, inference, or administrative shorthand
That’s not proof of wrongdoing — but it *is* a signal that the system is operating on **unverified or unexamined foundations**.
Where your work becomes powerful is here:
* separating **what is directly evidenced** (documents, patents, timelines, statements)
* from **what is inferred through correlation**
* from **what still requires a clear mechanism**
That step alone makes it far harder to dismiss.
Because once framed properly, the challenge becomes very simple:
> *What is the exact mechanism? Where is the direct evidence? And how does the claim move from signal to reality?*
Until that bridge is clearly shown, certainty — on either side — is premature.
That’s not a weakness. That’s discipline.
And it’s also where this kind of work becomes genuinely useful — legally, scientifically, and publicly — because it forces clarification instead of just creating more narrative.
Keep going with it — but keep tightening it.
That’s how this moves from “interesting” to “unavoidable.”
—
And honestly… a lot of people aren’t ready yet for where some of these lines of inquiry might lead once the mechanisms are properly unpacked — especially in areas like chronic disease and cancer is just parasites and poisons and quantum science
I hadn’t known that the nocebo was worse than the placebo was better…
Though shouldn’t be surprised I suppose. What do you make of all the normies who shout nocebo from the rooftops when it comes to vax injury (“you expected the vaccine to be bad therefore you developed symptoms in accordance with your belief”), and EMF sensitivity (“it’s all in your head, you did too much research that wifi and electricity is bad so now you are manifesting it…”) and basically any other thing we might say is bad (pesticides, chemicals etc).
Is there a weird inversion going on here that normies are creating monsters in their mind that don’t exist and suffering impacts, while simultaneously asserting that this is what awake folks are doing when they experience real symptoms in response to real problems?
Are you suggesting Covid was a AI invention? And that there wasn’t a virus attacking people. As a Dr. who specializes in FM.I can assure you it was real. Perhaps these papers convincing you it was AI are also papers written to psych op you. I don’t fall ill ever and I fell prey to it. And so did ma large percentage of my patient base. I don’t reside in a city where the lemming rule applies, the people I treat are not subject to mind control and suggestion. The people I know who died from it were already challenged with anutoimmune and morbid obese. And no I’m not a pill pusher quite the opposite none of my patients that fell ill went to the ER. I suspect it was more or less the GWEN towers they threw up overnight creating radiation sickness. Electroporation And Dielectrophoresis vibrating the cellular walls enough for any retroviruses to push thru creating an internal dysbiosis. Yes the hospitals magnified the deaths by creating septicemia with forced oxygen therapy as rewarded by Trump and his CAREs act This was no fake virus they released a biological weapon on the people and the eugenics vaccine and hospitals finished the job. The spike protein is causing massive issues now with cognitive decline in 25% of the population so to say it’s fake is ridiculous. And while I agree most white papers are BS and to find the truth you have to be able to creatively read them. Not all are written by AI. As I also know many valid researchers independently funding their own research on this. There is a massive info dissemination project that has long been going on even before Covid. But you are wrong about the crown virus not being weaponized and this is all the power of suggestion. The magicians that pull then puppet strings aren’t that good. At their sorcery. As that only works on the weak minded.
I learned a long time ago to pay attention to clinical experience over any research. Considering how I’ve cured and saved the lives of many preventing from entering,The death hospitals …many after running non PCR diagnostics. I’m very much on the mark. But I suspected you wee going to say in as much.
"[I]f LLMs can be poisoned, 'this is something that’s concerning for us.'"
Well, of course they can be poisoned. Of course they can be gamed. They're *supposed* to be. That's the entire point of them. OpenAI admitted last year that even with perfect data, LLMs will always lie and hallucinate "due to fundamental statistical and computational limits" and "fundamental mathematical constraints." Allowing that shit anywhere near any human endeavor that relies on knowledge and history--notably law and medicine--is suicide and should be criminalized.
Besides AI's applications to the surveillance state, the deliberate corruption of objectivity is its only other reason for existing. It's there to destroy people's ability to tell real from fake. That contributes to learned helplessness and that's good for psychopaths who need mental passivity and indifference in the people they want to rule.
"If a blind person leads a blind person, both of them will fall into a hole." Gospel of Saint Thomas, verse 34. Just something a wise guy said couple centuries ago.
An excellent look at the severe issues with ai - which, after two forays, I have chosen never to use again if I can help it.
Somehow, this does not surprise Me, but it's nice having details!
"I sell no bullshit supplements, no crappy merchandise, no whacko gadgets, I have no sponsors, no advertising and everything is possible to read for free." Why I love you... ♥
Thank you .
I thought this was outrageous when I saw it too. So they are just in your face admitting it now.
BTW, I put the same article in a note a few days ago. I got one response from someone calling themselves "the last scientist". They proceeded to call me a fucking moron.
https://substack.com/@csofand/note/c-245406703?r=1ldnqe
Lol.. yes so many establishment attack dogs out there. Good work on finding it.
Thanks Jamie. You have really broken it down expertly.
i feel like this about "pots." came out of nowhere and was the trendy condition to have, in fact my 13 yr old niece got diagnosed with it 🤦🏻♀️ my sister said, "well she hs the classic case of pots..." so now at 14 she is on meds already. oh dont bother changing her diet or implementing some movement or some herbs or help her cope with her trauma that she had as an infant that i see playing arole in her life now.....oye.
The idea that A/i will be smarter than man is ridiculous. It may be able to collect data and present it an a more orderly manner. It may be able to write fake songs for U-Tube and it may be able to replace some jobs that are nothing more than paper shuffling...so what? For A/i to work, it has to be coded flawlessly.
It's initial data feed has to be totally truthful. When was the last time computer software didn't need constant updating? Never. GIGO (garbage in-garbage out) still applies to the silly A/i retards.
But I think Jamie used it to re-plumb his house, so there is that.
Jamie — this is exactly the kind of work that needs to be done, and more importantly, *done properly*.
What you’re surfacing here isn’t just “alternative thinking” — it’s identification of **compressed assumptions** that most people never stop to examine. That’s where the real value is.
If you run this through a structured lens like PIE (Precision, Internal Coherence, External Consistency, Constraint Awareness) combined with Boundary Control, something interesting happens:
* A lot of what you’re pointing at moves out of the “dismissible narrative” category
* And into **legitimate evidential gaps, unresolved mechanisms, and pattern-level signals that warrant investigation**
That’s a very different position.
Because the real issue isn’t whether every conclusion is already proven — it’s whether the **official explanations are relying on assumed bridges that haven’t actually been evidenced**.
And in multiple domains (legal, medical, institutional), we keep seeing the same pattern:
* strong surface-level certainty
* but weak or opaque underlying mechanisms
* and heavy reliance on proxy measures, inference, or administrative shorthand
That’s not proof of wrongdoing — but it *is* a signal that the system is operating on **unverified or unexamined foundations**.
Where your work becomes powerful is here:
* separating **what is directly evidenced** (documents, patents, timelines, statements)
* from **what is inferred through correlation**
* from **what still requires a clear mechanism**
That step alone makes it far harder to dismiss.
Because once framed properly, the challenge becomes very simple:
> *What is the exact mechanism? Where is the direct evidence? And how does the claim move from signal to reality?*
Until that bridge is clearly shown, certainty — on either side — is premature.
That’s not a weakness. That’s discipline.
And it’s also where this kind of work becomes genuinely useful — legally, scientifically, and publicly — because it forces clarification instead of just creating more narrative.
Keep going with it — but keep tightening it.
That’s how this moves from “interesting” to “unavoidable.”
—
And honestly… a lot of people aren’t ready yet for where some of these lines of inquiry might lead once the mechanisms are properly unpacked — especially in areas like chronic disease and cancer is just parasites and poisons and quantum science
Crikey!
I hadn’t known that the nocebo was worse than the placebo was better…
Though shouldn’t be surprised I suppose. What do you make of all the normies who shout nocebo from the rooftops when it comes to vax injury (“you expected the vaccine to be bad therefore you developed symptoms in accordance with your belief”), and EMF sensitivity (“it’s all in your head, you did too much research that wifi and electricity is bad so now you are manifesting it…”) and basically any other thing we might say is bad (pesticides, chemicals etc).
Is there a weird inversion going on here that normies are creating monsters in their mind that don’t exist and suffering impacts, while simultaneously asserting that this is what awake folks are doing when they experience real symptoms in response to real problems?
Thank you for your tireless work Jamie.
Blessings from Aus….our fallen (sold out ) country.
FYI: Dr. Antonioni’s Imaginary Disease
https://mikechappelle.substack.com/p/dr-antonionis-imaginary-disease-f18?r=r80qj&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Excellent video!!
Funny how the 1980’s info so closely matched the “Big C con”
Are you suggesting Covid was a AI invention? And that there wasn’t a virus attacking people. As a Dr. who specializes in FM.I can assure you it was real. Perhaps these papers convincing you it was AI are also papers written to psych op you. I don’t fall ill ever and I fell prey to it. And so did ma large percentage of my patient base. I don’t reside in a city where the lemming rule applies, the people I treat are not subject to mind control and suggestion. The people I know who died from it were already challenged with anutoimmune and morbid obese. And no I’m not a pill pusher quite the opposite none of my patients that fell ill went to the ER. I suspect it was more or less the GWEN towers they threw up overnight creating radiation sickness. Electroporation And Dielectrophoresis vibrating the cellular walls enough for any retroviruses to push thru creating an internal dysbiosis. Yes the hospitals magnified the deaths by creating septicemia with forced oxygen therapy as rewarded by Trump and his CAREs act This was no fake virus they released a biological weapon on the people and the eugenics vaccine and hospitals finished the job. The spike protein is causing massive issues now with cognitive decline in 25% of the population so to say it’s fake is ridiculous. And while I agree most white papers are BS and to find the truth you have to be able to creatively read them. Not all are written by AI. As I also know many valid researchers independently funding their own research on this. There is a massive info dissemination project that has long been going on even before Covid. But you are wrong about the crown virus not being weaponized and this is all the power of suggestion. The magicians that pull then puppet strings aren’t that good. At their sorcery. As that only works on the weak minded.
You are quite far from the mark.
I learned a long time ago to pay attention to clinical experience over any research. Considering how I’ve cured and saved the lives of many preventing from entering,The death hospitals …many after running non PCR diagnostics. I’m very much on the mark. But I suspected you wee going to say in as much.
I think you will like our new healing forum:
https://myfountianofyouth.com/forum/
We are your peeps.