😂😂😂😂 honestly it does feel so amateur… If it werent for the fact you plug it in to a computer to get a graphical readout it would certainly feel like a toy…
the stupid thing is.. the compents are exactly the same as the “real deal”…. thats just how shit the “real deal” is.
Let's hope you and your team have a lot of success and luck in the controls. With God's help, the impossible becomes possible. Fingers crossed for you. 😇
Wonderful work Jamie and Team, Thank you all! The results surely forthcoming which are the seeds for this Realm to be planted for everybody's family's next 7 generations.... have a great Christmas everybody and looking forward to more stage props being removed! :) They don't have any kind of formula to produce a vaccine for a virus! N+V!
And I realized (and I know I am not breaking new ground here at all!) that all this bs stems from peoples’ belief in viruses and contagion.
Most people who don’t believe in vaccines still believe in viruses. And that belief is ingrained in humans from the earliest ages. Frustrating to try to combat that even in my small circle.
And on a larger scale many substackers seem to suggest that saying viruses are not real is like the third rail and they won’t go there.
Got something say, and I'm sure masses will wonder is this that, there is group of people who says the whole dna science is hoax, Virology is hoax? The concept of virus is a hoax? Who are these people? What are your credentials? What makes you credible to enough point flaws in anything in the first place? Yeah this a logical fallacy appeal to authority. But then one can see this alternatively. If you are not in the field how one can be certain that you understand the workings of the field. Let alone credible enough to show flaws in it. Pointing flaws at something can be seen as misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the workings of the field. This is hoax, that is hoax, masses will always choose to go with considering worst case scenario. For better survival chances. And masses will choose to go with viral paradigm considering the worst case scenario. UNLESS the group of people knock the doors of court. Present the findings in court, show that this is hoax. yes we not being in the field might be interpreting the data differently, misinterpretation is not the right word. We are interpreting the data differently being outside the field. Being outside of the field IS what makes us more credible than the people within the field as we are not bound to think within Indoctrinated box. We are thinking outside the box which makes us as credible as people within the field if not more. Let the logics of both the sides be face to face in courtroom. Or else findings will only be echoing within the movement and eventually fade away. People will start leaving. And get back to viral paradigm. Its a human tendency to always prefer worst case scenario.
Trust me I'm no critique here. Of the no virus position. I'll suggest start with putting the matter in court. All together. Let the email campaigns be initiated, share the template here and in all the channels of no virus, and let all the followers copy and paste the email and send to officials in floods. Suppression cannot win. But I see no virus position may possibly lack in terms of confidence with the position hence the further solid, more meaningful proceedings are not being taken into consideration.
Did you get the Fisher Price PCR kit? 😂
Or the Easy Bake PCR oven?
Thanks for doing science to show that "the science" is bullshit.
😂😂😂😂 honestly it does feel so amateur… If it werent for the fact you plug it in to a computer to get a graphical readout it would certainly feel like a toy…
the stupid thing is.. the compents are exactly the same as the “real deal”…. thats just how shit the “real deal” is.
Thanks for the update, Jamie.
Thank you for everything you and the team are doing. This is the most important study of our lifetimes. Grateful to help in anyway I can. 🙏❤️
Groundbreaking and vital work. Thank you.
Thank you for your kind words and support, it means alot!
Let's hope you and your team have a lot of success and luck in the controls. With God's help, the impossible becomes possible. Fingers crossed for you. 😇
I look forward to your progress.
Wonderful work Jamie and Team, Thank you all! The results surely forthcoming which are the seeds for this Realm to be planted for everybody's family's next 7 generations.... have a great Christmas everybody and looking forward to more stage props being removed! :) They don't have any kind of formula to produce a vaccine for a virus! N+V!
Jamie, thank you for everything you do.
So I follow conspiracy Sarah and she posted this:
https://conspiracysarah.substack.com/p/prep-act-emergency-declaration-for?
How the PreP act is being continued until 2029.
And I realized (and I know I am not breaking new ground here at all!) that all this bs stems from peoples’ belief in viruses and contagion.
Most people who don’t believe in vaccines still believe in viruses. And that belief is ingrained in humans from the earliest ages. Frustrating to try to combat that even in my small circle.
And on a larger scale many substackers seem to suggest that saying viruses are not real is like the third rail and they won’t go there.
Yes alot of substacks are limited hangouts..
To stop Vaccines it is essential to tackle the problem at the roots which is that of virology…
thank you for you kind words and support
You are a busy bunny! Thank you for all your hard work - it is appreciated. Have a good break for Christmas and enjoy some family time.
Thank you Susan for all of your support., couldn't do it without you.
Plans for us… my friend in medical field says Illinois will require a mask in hospitals and medical settings starting 12/26. RSV you know.
Doctors just coerced a young mom we know to give the rsv vaccine to her teensy four pound preemie girl. So sick.
Got something say, and I'm sure masses will wonder is this that, there is group of people who says the whole dna science is hoax, Virology is hoax? The concept of virus is a hoax? Who are these people? What are your credentials? What makes you credible to enough point flaws in anything in the first place? Yeah this a logical fallacy appeal to authority. But then one can see this alternatively. If you are not in the field how one can be certain that you understand the workings of the field. Let alone credible enough to show flaws in it. Pointing flaws at something can be seen as misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the workings of the field. This is hoax, that is hoax, masses will always choose to go with considering worst case scenario. For better survival chances. And masses will choose to go with viral paradigm considering the worst case scenario. UNLESS the group of people knock the doors of court. Present the findings in court, show that this is hoax. yes we not being in the field might be interpreting the data differently, misinterpretation is not the right word. We are interpreting the data differently being outside the field. Being outside of the field IS what makes us more credible than the people within the field as we are not bound to think within Indoctrinated box. We are thinking outside the box which makes us as credible as people within the field if not more. Let the logics of both the sides be face to face in courtroom. Or else findings will only be echoing within the movement and eventually fade away. People will start leaving. And get back to viral paradigm. Its a human tendency to always prefer worst case scenario.
Trust me I'm no critique here. Of the no virus position. I'll suggest start with putting the matter in court. All together. Let the email campaigns be initiated, share the template here and in all the channels of no virus, and let all the followers copy and paste the email and send to officials in floods. Suppression cannot win. But I see no virus position may possibly lack in terms of confidence with the position hence the further solid, more meaningful proceedings are not being taken into consideration.