16 Comments
User's avatar
Jeffrey Pitts's avatar

I can’t imagine what it must be like to live in their world.

Admittedly, I’ve lived with beliefs that are lies (including virology) but this has to be unhealthy for your mental state to work in these professions.

It’s like a club of the insane assuring each other they are sane with increasingly arcane beliefs buttressed by outwardly impressive, bullshit technology.

Jamie Andrews's avatar

Agreed. Nicely put.

Doug Leclair's avatar

Well said Jeffery!

The illusions are being dissolved by Jamie's work and others that are sharing it and waking up to the truth.

Thank you!

Ernie Rockwell's avatar

Time for Jamie to write a book titled "dissolving illusions II"? In any event, very enlightening. I had no familiarity with this subject before.

Proton Magic's avatar

Jamie, the correct spelling of chemistry is "clownistry". Pls adjust your spelling accordingly. But as usual great post!

Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Quite an eye-opener! Thank You for the hard work You have done to show that "DNA" is a farce. I hope this is shared around the globe!!!!!

Jamie Andrews's avatar

Thank you for your continued support.

Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Love always, Jamie!

Frances Leader's avatar

You put a big grin on these old chops, Jamie. All my life I have thought I was scientifically stupid because I just could not get some of the most basic ideas to gel in my bonce. My brain just could not 'go there'.

Thank you very much for your existence. xx

Jamie Andrews's avatar

Thank you Frances. The entirety of Modern Science is set up to discombobulate with jargon words, especially in the field of genetics, purely so those with a questioning mind struggle to even formulate Cojent questions.

Thank you for persevering. Onwards and Upwards. J X

Telestai Nexus's avatar

Wonderful work again Jamie! The part about the (non) visibility of DNA was fabulous! I had a good laugh! Thanks :) ... they say it packs extremely tightly but then it's one hell of a job for the "enzymes" or "magic processes" to "express genes" and do all the repairing work every day, namely 10000 alleged strand breaks per cell etc. ad absurdum haha

Research Integrity's avatar

Great picture with tall DNA.

Who knows what happens there when we can't see anything. A million theories can be made, it depends on what one wants to achieve. It would be great if DNA was found to be just some type of jelly: https://www.cocinista.es/download/bancorecursos/recetas/receta-aspic-pollo.jpg

Proton Magic's avatar

About the 2 meter long string of DNA;

Human cell types have diameter of about 10 to 100µm (the largest being an egg cell). Lets say we put the strand of DNA 2 meters long into a round cell with a diameter of 100µm. Since a micro meter is 1-millionth of a meter, 100µm would have to fold 20 thousand times to fit one direction in the cell, lets say the height of the 100µm cell. The width of this cell would need to accept 20 thousand folds @ 2nm width per fold or 20,000nm. This would be 20 microns, about twice the width of a red blood cell and easily seen.

References:

https://book.bionumbers.org/how-big-is-a-human-cell/

https://www.metric-conversions.org/length/meters-to-micrometers.htm

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=how+many+micro+meters+in+a+meter&ia=web

Albert Mathews's avatar

More like this pls

Susan Creed's avatar

Thank you Jamie, excellent work. I always sit open-mouthed in shock at your revelations of their Big Lies; if nothing else they are audacious!

Lance's avatar

Can anyone please explain to me how we can manufacture chips at nanometre scales https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_nm_process , but cannot see DNA with a width of 220nm?