Very good and extremely comprehensive work here to show that CPE is purely a result of the cell culture protocol used. This is very clear. My only difficulty when reading this is that I cannot relate the initial flow diagram and description which says two preparations with the detailed observations of the TEM imagery which shows some slides from Preparations 3 and 4. Possibly I missed something here but nevertheless I’d like to understand this small detail to be clear what I am looking at.
What does the AI say? If we compare the results from Albert with the results from Jamie? If we adjust Albert's conditions to Jamie's. Let the AI calculate if possible :))
I have to admit that this excellent study by Jamie Andrews is difficult to understand, line by line. I could not take the hours a proper reading would require of me, having to look up every 5th word and every acronym.
I do understand the basic outline, namely that a 'cell culture' with 2% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (starvation) medium produces abundant cytopathic effect (CPE) with no 'infected innoculum". And that the "non-infected" and starved culture (2% again of fetal claf blood) produced abundant CPE compared to cell culture with 10% FBS. Moreover, particles viewed with electron microscopy (EM) and lab-documented as present are identical in morphology to 'viruses' such as Sars Cov 2, HIV and measles. These 'viruses' were produced in cell cultures originally provided and certified by virology labs as 'uninfected', but yet they are proven to appear in response to starvation as tissues decompose and break into tiny fragments.
It is the same with all the micrographs in official displays of this or that 'virus'....it's all 'point and declare'. Cell culturing is a method that by starvation, poisoning by powerful antibiotics and other chemicals and stress from having been ripped away from a living organism...all these factors kill the 'cells'. Dead cells decompose and break down into shards. Virus believers then choose a 'virus-ey' appearing shard and decide that's HIV or rabies or small pox. That is the virus causing the CTE in our ritual!
Pretty slick.
I look words up many times trying to learn this esoteric language that makes reading studies difficult for ordinary people. Here is an indicator of my wanderings through the woods. Assay...that's some sort of attempted count of viruses or some other object of interest in a lab biological soup. Antigen...that is either a protein coat of a virus to which another protein named antibody reacts (sometimes). Or it is the protein identity of an antibody...depending on the day and source. Reagent is a thing in a biological soup thought by virus believers to react somehow to viruses.
Somehow... I am not surprised. Thank You for all You do to show the farce of virology.
Great work Jamie,
Yet another study that can be added to the list showing that CPE is non specific.
https://zenodo.org/records/15872332
🙌 brilliant work
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Very good and extremely comprehensive work here to show that CPE is purely a result of the cell culture protocol used. This is very clear. My only difficulty when reading this is that I cannot relate the initial flow diagram and description which says two preparations with the detailed observations of the TEM imagery which shows some slides from Preparations 3 and 4. Possibly I missed something here but nevertheless I’d like to understand this small detail to be clear what I am looking at.
What does the AI say? If we compare the results from Albert with the results from Jamie? If we adjust Albert's conditions to Jamie's. Let the AI calculate if possible :))
I have to admit that this excellent study by Jamie Andrews is difficult to understand, line by line. I could not take the hours a proper reading would require of me, having to look up every 5th word and every acronym.
I do understand the basic outline, namely that a 'cell culture' with 2% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (starvation) medium produces abundant cytopathic effect (CPE) with no 'infected innoculum". And that the "non-infected" and starved culture (2% again of fetal claf blood) produced abundant CPE compared to cell culture with 10% FBS. Moreover, particles viewed with electron microscopy (EM) and lab-documented as present are identical in morphology to 'viruses' such as Sars Cov 2, HIV and measles. These 'viruses' were produced in cell cultures originally provided and certified by virology labs as 'uninfected', but yet they are proven to appear in response to starvation as tissues decompose and break into tiny fragments.
It is the same with all the micrographs in official displays of this or that 'virus'....it's all 'point and declare'. Cell culturing is a method that by starvation, poisoning by powerful antibiotics and other chemicals and stress from having been ripped away from a living organism...all these factors kill the 'cells'. Dead cells decompose and break down into shards. Virus believers then choose a 'virus-ey' appearing shard and decide that's HIV or rabies or small pox. That is the virus causing the CTE in our ritual!
Pretty slick.
I look words up many times trying to learn this esoteric language that makes reading studies difficult for ordinary people. Here is an indicator of my wanderings through the woods. Assay...that's some sort of attempted count of viruses or some other object of interest in a lab biological soup. Antigen...that is either a protein coat of a virus to which another protein named antibody reacts (sometimes). Or it is the protein identity of an antibody...depending on the day and source. Reagent is a thing in a biological soup thought by virus believers to react somehow to viruses.
Hard words are not my thing. Thank you Jamie.
We already did this 3 months ago. 2 of us did it. Now we have confirmation for controls, so ORI is waiting for this :) Do not be silent 🎯