Thanks for the detailed explanation and documentation. In short: virologists kill healthy cells in the lab by starving the cells to death. Virologists are cell killers. We expect the PCR controls to further strengthen the evidence.
There is no other way to better demonstrate the unscientific nature of virology than this, I think.
If supposedly "infected" cell cultures show the same result as cell cultures in which no patient sample was used, that is the end of the chain of evidence of virology.
The "virological method" is fundamentally inapplicable, as this would require the existence of an uninfected patient sample and an infected patient sample. However, neither exists, and even if they did, they would not be distinguishable from each other. In virology, the chronology of events is reversed, in a crazy feedback loop. Effect Y causes X, the trigger .
You would first have to use suitable isolates to determine whether infected and non-infected material exists, and isolation without cell culture and the inevitable effect of CPE does not exist according to virology. Virology goes round in circles around a centre that cannot be presented in a logical and solvable way. A self-fulfilling prophecy.
Anyone who wants to should continue to believe it and bathe in their hysterical fear. But the chain of evidence is not enough for subjugation and violation of human rights. Full stop, the end!
If virology's core processes rely on assumptions or experimental artifacts rather than direct observation, this demands deeper scrutiny. Science should remain open to re-evaluation, particularly when its conclusions impact global health policies and personal freedoms. However, such critiques also need to be met with counterarguments from virology to address these concerns transparently, or the field of virology risks losing all credibility....
Adding to the "viruses don't exist" narrative, you could argue that if the foundational methods used to isolate and identify viruses (such as cell culture experiments) are flawed, then the very existence of viruses as infectious agents might be questioned. Specifically, the lack of proper controls in viral isolation experiments undermines the validity of claiming that observed effects, like CPE, are caused by a virus rather than the artificial conditions of the experiment (e.g., reduced FBS, high antibiotics). Without direct evidence of a virus causing these effects... such as isolating and visualizing intact, infectious particles from a host, there's no definitive proof that the entity being studied is a pathogenic virus rather than a misinterpretation of cellular stress or debris.
This calls into question the entire basis for virology, as it relies heavily on these experimental setups to define and identify viruses!
Which is just. Stunning. Entire fields with awards, jobs, funding, policy etc. not to mention the downstream effects upon culture from movies to social decorum.
Jamie, mate, your work cannot be overstated. Unbelievable.
thanks for all this excellent work; the world seems to stand on either side of a wall; divided; those on our side of the wall will reflect on your findings and discuss them with others I hope; sadly I feel those that do not want to hear what your work reveals; will attack and refuse to consider; I must sit back and await to see what happens; thanks
Thank you James... I found out the truth for myself... For those that want to see it.... it is there... I can do no more.... I appreciate your support.
The results of the experiments of Stefan Lanka, namely the elite University in Switzerland, have been confirmed. The truth about PCR remains to be revealed in 2025. That's it. The rest of the controls would be certainly useful.
At 1h40m30s, you mentioned that a Canadian, I think the name was Brett Halls, who is looking to do his own experiments. I am also in Canada, and would very much like to team up with Brett if that's something that interest him as well. I'm also looking to do my own experiments repeating Dr. Lanka's, and have contacted several CROs with a protocol I prepared. If you think Brett would be interested, please share my email with him. thank you.
Hi Albert, Thank you for reaching out and fantastic news that you are motivated to do a project of your own. Brett is running a PCR specific control study so it is dependant on what area you were thinking of trying or all? In any case I will drop you an email to speak in more detail.
Yes I do know this. Right... yes I agree the whole of medical science is barbarism. Unfortunately there is no other way to falsify their methods than to use them.
There’s no point in trying to protect our children from being poisoned by vaccines, if we’re going to live in a society where they can just be murdered in utero and their body parts sold for medical experiments.
This is why these kooks like Paul Offit are so obsessed with vaccines. It’s not just money. They want you to inject yourselves with obscenities that will taint you both physically and morally.
Thanks for the detailed explanation and documentation. In short: virologists kill healthy cells in the lab by starving the cells to death. Virologists are cell killers. We expect the PCR controls to further strengthen the evidence.
Thank you Jamie and your team.
Cells being humans in a social culture
There is no other way to better demonstrate the unscientific nature of virology than this, I think.
If supposedly "infected" cell cultures show the same result as cell cultures in which no patient sample was used, that is the end of the chain of evidence of virology.
The "virological method" is fundamentally inapplicable, as this would require the existence of an uninfected patient sample and an infected patient sample. However, neither exists, and even if they did, they would not be distinguishable from each other. In virology, the chronology of events is reversed, in a crazy feedback loop. Effect Y causes X, the trigger .
You would first have to use suitable isolates to determine whether infected and non-infected material exists, and isolation without cell culture and the inevitable effect of CPE does not exist according to virology. Virology goes round in circles around a centre that cannot be presented in a logical and solvable way. A self-fulfilling prophecy.
Anyone who wants to should continue to believe it and bathe in their hysterical fear. But the chain of evidence is not enough for subjugation and violation of human rights. Full stop, the end!
Jamie, thank you. Every cent is well spent.
Thank you
If virology's core processes rely on assumptions or experimental artifacts rather than direct observation, this demands deeper scrutiny. Science should remain open to re-evaluation, particularly when its conclusions impact global health policies and personal freedoms. However, such critiques also need to be met with counterarguments from virology to address these concerns transparently, or the field of virology risks losing all credibility....
Adding to the "viruses don't exist" narrative, you could argue that if the foundational methods used to isolate and identify viruses (such as cell culture experiments) are flawed, then the very existence of viruses as infectious agents might be questioned. Specifically, the lack of proper controls in viral isolation experiments undermines the validity of claiming that observed effects, like CPE, are caused by a virus rather than the artificial conditions of the experiment (e.g., reduced FBS, high antibiotics). Without direct evidence of a virus causing these effects... such as isolating and visualizing intact, infectious particles from a host, there's no definitive proof that the entity being studied is a pathogenic virus rather than a misinterpretation of cellular stress or debris.
This calls into question the entire basis for virology, as it relies heavily on these experimental setups to define and identify viruses!
Exactly you got it in one 👍
Which is just. Stunning. Entire fields with awards, jobs, funding, policy etc. not to mention the downstream effects upon culture from movies to social decorum.
Jamie, mate, your work cannot be overstated. Unbelievable.
Thank you
One day "science" will become science.
I think it's coming soon, but who knows with humanity.
We are a very weird species that ignore common sense in favor of fantasies, whether good or bad.
Thanks for the hard work Jamie!
thanks for all this excellent work; the world seems to stand on either side of a wall; divided; those on our side of the wall will reflect on your findings and discuss them with others I hope; sadly I feel those that do not want to hear what your work reveals; will attack and refuse to consider; I must sit back and await to see what happens; thanks
Thank you James... I found out the truth for myself... For those that want to see it.... it is there... I can do no more.... I appreciate your support.
indeed; we can but try to talk to people and discuss these things;
The results of the experiments of Stefan Lanka, namely the elite University in Switzerland, have been confirmed. The truth about PCR remains to be revealed in 2025. That's it. The rest of the controls would be certainly useful.
🔥🔥🔥
Excellent write-up!
Thanks, Jamie. Fantastic fundamental work which has waited for years to be done at such a conclusive level. very well described and presented
Thank you Howard for all of your support.
Hello Jamie,
I just watched this video:
https://rumble.com/v5fjzrx-the-virology-control-studies-project-jamie-andrews.html
well done, very impressive.
At 1h40m30s, you mentioned that a Canadian, I think the name was Brett Halls, who is looking to do his own experiments. I am also in Canada, and would very much like to team up with Brett if that's something that interest him as well. I'm also looking to do my own experiments repeating Dr. Lanka's, and have contacted several CROs with a protocol I prepared. If you think Brett would be interested, please share my email with him. thank you.
albert.c.mathews@gmail.com
Hi Albert, Thank you for reaching out and fantastic news that you are motivated to do a project of your own. Brett is running a PCR specific control study so it is dependant on what area you were thinking of trying or all? In any case I will drop you an email to speak in more detail.
Cheers Jamie
Thanks Jamie! Content bringing changes.....all good news!
Finally!! Thank you!!! It’s done!
Well done!!!
You should have included "scientific" in your title Jamie. Just to really make some people flip flops.
LOL..... the scientist was playing dress up aparently according to the former Personal Trainer cum blogger... 😉
HEK 293?! No, just no.
The most robust and widely used cell line in clinical research? What is the problem here?
It’s taken from an aborted fetus. You don’t know this?
Yes I do know this. Right... yes I agree the whole of medical science is barbarism. Unfortunately there is no other way to falsify their methods than to use them.
Nope.
There’s no point in trying to protect our children from being poisoned by vaccines, if we’re going to live in a society where they can just be murdered in utero and their body parts sold for medical experiments.
This is why these kooks like Paul Offit are so obsessed with vaccines. It’s not just money. They want you to inject yourselves with obscenities that will taint you both physically and morally.
Agreed.
Cool... just fund it and we can do whatever you want to look at.
Might I suggest that at least one generation of humanity will need to transpire before the purge of viruses in the vernacular even begins…
There's an interview Id like to see.
What's McKernan's stance on DNA and genetics in general ? If u dont mind me asking
He will be but late ;)
I'm always open to surprises. ;)