There is no other way to better demonstrate the unscientific nature of virology than this, I think.
If supposedly "infected" cell cultures show the same result as cell cultures in which no patient sample was used, that is the end of the chain of evidence of virology.
The "virological method" is fundamentally inapplicable, as this would require the existence of an uninfected patient sample and an infected patient sample. However, neither exists, and even if they did, they would not be distinguishable from each other. In virology, the chronology of events is reversed, in a crazy feedback loop. Effect Y causes X, the trigger .
You would first have to use suitable isolates to determine whether infected and non-infected material exists, and isolation without cell culture and the inevitable effect of CPE does not exist according to virology. Virology goes round in circles around a centre that cannot be presented in a logical and solvable way. A self-fulfilling prophecy.
Anyone who wants to should continue to believe it and bathe in their hysterical fear. But the chain of evidence is not enough for subjugation and violation of human rights. Full stop, the end!
If virology's core processes rely on assumptions or experimental artifacts rather than direct observation, this demands deeper scrutiny. Science should remain open to re-evaluation, particularly when its conclusions impact global health policies and personal freedoms. However, such critiques also need to be met with counterarguments from virology to address these concerns transparently, or the field of virology risks losing all credibility....
Thanks for the detailed explanation and documentation. In short: virologists kill healthy cells in the lab by starving the cells to death. Virologists are cell killers. We expect the PCR controls to further strengthen the evidence.
Adding to the "viruses don't exist" narrative, you could argue that if the foundational methods used to isolate and identify viruses (such as cell culture experiments) are flawed, then the very existence of viruses as infectious agents might be questioned. Specifically, the lack of proper controls in viral isolation experiments undermines the validity of claiming that observed effects, like CPE, are caused by a virus rather than the artificial conditions of the experiment (e.g., reduced FBS, high antibiotics). Without direct evidence of a virus causing these effects... such as isolating and visualizing intact, infectious particles from a host, there's no definitive proof that the entity being studied is a pathogenic virus rather than a misinterpretation of cellular stress or debris.
This calls into question the entire basis for virology, as it relies heavily on these experimental setups to define and identify viruses!
Which is just. Stunning. Entire fields with awards, jobs, funding, policy etc. not to mention the downstream effects upon culture from movies to social decorum.
Jamie, mate, your work cannot be overstated. Unbelievable.
thanks for all this excellent work; the world seems to stand on either side of a wall; divided; those on our side of the wall will reflect on your findings and discuss them with others I hope; sadly I feel those that do not want to hear what your work reveals; will attack and refuse to consider; I must sit back and await to see what happens; thanks
Thank you James... I found out the truth for myself... For those that want to see it.... it is there... I can do no more.... I appreciate your support.
The results of the experiments of Stefan Lanka, namely the elite University in Switzerland, have been confirmed. The truth about PCR remains to be revealed in 2025. That's it. The rest of the controls would be certainly useful.
At 1h40m30s, you mentioned that a Canadian, I think the name was Brett Halls, who is looking to do his own experiments. I am also in Canada, and would very much like to team up with Brett if that's something that interest him as well. I'm also looking to do my own experiments repeating Dr. Lanka's, and have contacted several CROs with a protocol I prepared. If you think Brett would be interested, please share my email with him. thank you.
Hi Albert, Thank you for reaching out and fantastic news that you are motivated to do a project of your own. Brett is running a PCR specific control study so it is dependant on what area you were thinking of trying or all? In any case I will drop you an email to speak in more detail.
Well Jamie, it's been nearly 6 months since the results of your experiment have been documented.
I note here in the comments section that there is exactly zero comments from the twatterati such as sense strand (AKA debunk the funk) whose hair is bigger than his ego, the guy from the Air force psy ops, the sheep farmer, and their ilk.
Funny that 🤔
I thought they would all over this like flies on shit debunking the experiment, but nope, radio silence and crickets.
As I haven't been on Twatter since 2023, are they still on there patronising people in their bully groups with their viruses are real, vaxx are safe and effective horse shit?
There is no other way to better demonstrate the unscientific nature of virology than this, I think.
If supposedly "infected" cell cultures show the same result as cell cultures in which no patient sample was used, that is the end of the chain of evidence of virology.
The "virological method" is fundamentally inapplicable, as this would require the existence of an uninfected patient sample and an infected patient sample. However, neither exists, and even if they did, they would not be distinguishable from each other. In virology, the chronology of events is reversed, in a crazy feedback loop. Effect Y causes X, the trigger .
You would first have to use suitable isolates to determine whether infected and non-infected material exists, and isolation without cell culture and the inevitable effect of CPE does not exist according to virology. Virology goes round in circles around a centre that cannot be presented in a logical and solvable way. A self-fulfilling prophecy.
Anyone who wants to should continue to believe it and bathe in their hysterical fear. But the chain of evidence is not enough for subjugation and violation of human rights. Full stop, the end!
Jamie, thank you. Every cent is well spent.
Thank you
If virology's core processes rely on assumptions or experimental artifacts rather than direct observation, this demands deeper scrutiny. Science should remain open to re-evaluation, particularly when its conclusions impact global health policies and personal freedoms. However, such critiques also need to be met with counterarguments from virology to address these concerns transparently, or the field of virology risks losing all credibility....
6 months later and still no critiques about this experiment from the virolieologists.
Strange but true 🤔
Circular reasoning is what the virolieologists and big pHarma depend on.
You are sick because of a virus, so it must be a virus making you sick.
Yet they provide zero evidence to back up this claim.
Thanks for the detailed explanation and documentation. In short: virologists kill healthy cells in the lab by starving the cells to death. Virologists are cell killers. We expect the PCR controls to further strengthen the evidence.
Thank you Jamie and your team.
Cells being humans in a social culture
Adding to the "viruses don't exist" narrative, you could argue that if the foundational methods used to isolate and identify viruses (such as cell culture experiments) are flawed, then the very existence of viruses as infectious agents might be questioned. Specifically, the lack of proper controls in viral isolation experiments undermines the validity of claiming that observed effects, like CPE, are caused by a virus rather than the artificial conditions of the experiment (e.g., reduced FBS, high antibiotics). Without direct evidence of a virus causing these effects... such as isolating and visualizing intact, infectious particles from a host, there's no definitive proof that the entity being studied is a pathogenic virus rather than a misinterpretation of cellular stress or debris.
This calls into question the entire basis for virology, as it relies heavily on these experimental setups to define and identify viruses!
Exactly you got it in one 👍
Which is just. Stunning. Entire fields with awards, jobs, funding, policy etc. not to mention the downstream effects upon culture from movies to social decorum.
Jamie, mate, your work cannot be overstated. Unbelievable.
Thank you
It has been flawed since Enders failed 1954 experiment.
That should have been the end of virolieology.
But nope Rockefeller and the parasites knew that you can scare people with invisible threats and make tons of money.
One day "science" will become science.
I think it's coming soon, but who knows with humanity.
We are a very weird species that ignore common sense in favor of fantasies, whether good or bad.
Thanks for the hard work Jamie!
thanks for all this excellent work; the world seems to stand on either side of a wall; divided; those on our side of the wall will reflect on your findings and discuss them with others I hope; sadly I feel those that do not want to hear what your work reveals; will attack and refuse to consider; I must sit back and await to see what happens; thanks
Thank you James... I found out the truth for myself... For those that want to see it.... it is there... I can do no more.... I appreciate your support.
indeed; we can but try to talk to people and discuss these things;
The results of the experiments of Stefan Lanka, namely the elite University in Switzerland, have been confirmed. The truth about PCR remains to be revealed in 2025. That's it. The rest of the controls would be certainly useful.
Well its been nearly 6 months James.
Nothing from the patronising Twatterati bullies.
So that must mean debunk has lost all his funk then, and the sheep farmer is shagging his sheep out of frustration!
🔥🔥🔥
Excellent write-up!
Thanks, Jamie. Fantastic fundamental work which has waited for years to be done at such a conclusive level. very well described and presented
Thank you Howard for all of your support.
Hello Jamie,
I just watched this video:
https://rumble.com/v5fjzrx-the-virology-control-studies-project-jamie-andrews.html
well done, very impressive.
At 1h40m30s, you mentioned that a Canadian, I think the name was Brett Halls, who is looking to do his own experiments. I am also in Canada, and would very much like to team up with Brett if that's something that interest him as well. I'm also looking to do my own experiments repeating Dr. Lanka's, and have contacted several CROs with a protocol I prepared. If you think Brett would be interested, please share my email with him. thank you.
albert.c.mathews@gmail.com
Hi Albert, Thank you for reaching out and fantastic news that you are motivated to do a project of your own. Brett is running a PCR specific control study so it is dependant on what area you were thinking of trying or all? In any case I will drop you an email to speak in more detail.
Cheers Jamie
You should have included "scientific" in your title Jamie. Just to really make some people flip flops.
LOL..... the scientist was playing dress up aparently according to the former Personal Trainer cum blogger... 😉
Thanks Jamie! Content bringing changes.....all good news!
Finally!! Thank you!!! It’s done!
Well done!!!
Well Jamie, it's been nearly 6 months since the results of your experiment have been documented.
I note here in the comments section that there is exactly zero comments from the twatterati such as sense strand (AKA debunk the funk) whose hair is bigger than his ego, the guy from the Air force psy ops, the sheep farmer, and their ilk.
Funny that 🤔
I thought they would all over this like flies on shit debunking the experiment, but nope, radio silence and crickets.
As I haven't been on Twatter since 2023, are they still on there patronising people in their bully groups with their viruses are real, vaxx are safe and effective horse shit?
https://vegetativetraining.wordpress.com/analysis-of-pandemics-by-prof-christian-schubert/